Advertisers Jump on Coronavirus Bandwagon: Politics, News, and Business

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00923v1
• Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:07:56 GMT
• Title: Advertisers Jump on Coronavirus Bandwagon: Politics, News, and Business
• Authors: Yelena Mejova and Kyriaki Kalimeri
• Abstract summary: We examine the alternative narratives around the coronavirus outbreak through advertisements promoted on Facebook. Using the new Facebook Ads Library, we discover advertisers from public health and non-profit sectors, alongside those from news media, politics, and business. We find several instances of possible misinformation, ranging from bioweapons conspiracy theories to unverifiable claims by politicians.
• Score: 7.056222499095849
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In the age of social media, disasters and epidemics usher not only a devastation and affliction in the physical world, but also prompt a deluge of information, opinions, prognoses and advice to billions of internet users. The coronavirus epidemic of 2019-2020, or COVID-19, is no exception, with the World Health Organization warning of a possible "infodemic" of fake news. In this study, we examine the alternative narratives around the coronavirus outbreak through advertisements promoted on Facebook, the largest social media platform in the US. Using the new Facebook Ads Library, we discover advertisers from public health and non-profit sectors, alongside those from news media, politics, and business, incorporating coronavirus into their messaging and agenda. We find the virus used in political attacks, donation solicitations, business promotion, stock market advice, and animal rights campaigning. Among these, we find several instances of possible misinformation, ranging from bioweapons conspiracy theories to unverifiable claims by politicians. As we make the dataset available to the community, we hope the advertising domain will become an important part of quality control for public health communication and public discourse in general.

Related papers

• Event Detection from Social Media for Epidemic Prediction [76.90779562626541]
  We develop a framework to extract and analyze epidemic-related events from social media posts. Experimentation reveals how ED models trained on COVID-based SPEED can effectively detect epidemic events for three unseen epidemics. We show that reporting sharp increases in the extracted events by our framework can provide warnings 4-9 weeks earlier than the WHO epidemic declaration for Monkeypox.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T06:31:17Z)
• Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Campaign on Facebook using Minimal Supervision [28.14874371042193]
  In the age of social media, where billions of internet users share information and opinions, the negative impact of pandemics is not limited to the physical world. This global infodemic jeopardizes measures to control the pandemic by creating panic, vaccine hesitancy, and fragmented social response. Platforms like Facebook allow advertisers to adapt their messaging to target different demographics and help alleviate or exacerbate the infodemic problem depending on their content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T17:54:06Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Understanding Twitters behavior during the pandemic: Fake News and Fear [0.0]
  The SARS-CoV-2 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has been accompanied by a large amount of misleading and false information about the virus, especially on social media. We aim to explore the percentage of fake news being spread on Twitter as well as measure the sentiment of the public at the same time. Our study is useful in establishing the role of Twitter, and social media, during a crisis, and more specifically during crisis management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T16:39:29Z)
• Analysis of External Content in the Vaccination Discussion on Twitter [6.458496335718509]
  The spread of coronavirus and anti-vaccine conspiracies online hindered the pandemic. We examined the content of external articles shared on Twitter from February to June 2020.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T22:47:17Z)
• Facebook Ads: Politics of Migration in Italy [12.947791375188022]
  We employ a new resource for political ad monitoring -- Facebook Ads Library -- to examine advertising concerning the issue of immigration in Italy. We find evidence of targeting by the parties both in terms of geography and demographics (age and gender) We urge the research community to include online advertising in the monitoring of public discourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-09T09:32:31Z)
• Dark Web Marketplaces and COVID-19: before the vaccine [53.447910186085586]
  We analyse 851,199 listings extracted from 30 dark web marketplaces between January 1, 2020 and November 16, 2020. We identify 788 listings directly related to COVID-19 products and monitor the temporal evolution of product categories. We reveal how the online shadow economy has evolved during the COVID-19 pandemic and highlight the importance of a continuous monitoring of DWMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-04T14:27:41Z)
• Conspiracy in the Time of Corona: Automatic detection of Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories in Social Media and the News [0.0]
  Rumors and conspiracy theories thrive in environments of low confidence and low trust. We show how the various narrative frameworks fueling rumors and conspiracy theories rely on the alignment of otherwise disparate domains of knowledge. These alignments and attachments, which can be monitored in near real-time, may be useful for identifying areas in the news that are particularly vulnerable to reinterpretation by conspiracy theorists.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T19:27:48Z)
• The Ivory Tower Lost: How College Students Respond Differently than the General Public to the COVID-19 Pandemic [66.80677233314002]
  Pandemic of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented governments with ultimate challenges. In the United States, the country with the highest confirmed COVID-19 infection cases, a nationwide social distancing protocol has been implemented by the President. This paper aims to discover the social implications of this unprecedented disruption in our interactive society by mining people's opinions on social media.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T13:02:38Z)
• Digital Ariadne: Citizen Empowerment for Epidemic Control [55.41644538483948]
  The COVID-19 crisis represents the most dangerous threat to public health since the H1N1 pandemic of 1918. Technology-assisted location and contact tracing, if broadly adopted, may help limit the spread of infectious diseases. We present a tool, called 'diAry' or 'digital Ariadne', based on voluntary location and Bluetooth tracking on personal devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-16T15:53:42Z)
• Falling into the Echo Chamber: the Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter [65.7192861893042]
  We examine the extent to which the vaccination debate on Twitter is conductive to potential outreach to the vaccination hesitant. We discover that the vaccination skeptics, as well as the advocates, reside in their own distinct "echo chambers" At the center of these echo chambers we find the ardent supporters, for which we build highly accurate network- and content-based classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.