Conspiracy in the Time of Corona: Automatic detection of Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories in Social Media and the News

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13783v1
• Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 19:27:48 GMT
• Title: Conspiracy in the Time of Corona: Automatic detection of Covid-19 Conspiracy Theories in Social Media and the News
• Authors: Shadi Shahsavari, Pavan Holur, Timothy R. Tangherlini, Vwani Roychowdhury
• Abstract summary: Rumors and conspiracy theories thrive in environments of low confidence and low trust. We show how the various narrative frameworks fueling rumors and conspiracy theories rely on the alignment of otherwise disparate domains of knowledge. These alignments and attachments, which can be monitored in near real-time, may be useful for identifying areas in the news that are particularly vulnerable to reinterpretation by conspiracy theorists.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Rumors and conspiracy theories thrive in environments of low confidence and low trust. Consequently, it is not surprising that ones related to the Covid-19 pandemic are proliferating given the lack of any authoritative scientific consensus on the virus, its spread and containment, or on the long term social and economic ramifications of the pandemic. Among the stories currently circulating are ones suggesting that the 5G network activates the virus, that the pandemic is a hoax perpetrated by a global cabal, that the virus is a bio-weapon released deliberately by the Chinese, or that Bill Gates is using it as cover to launch a global surveillance regime. While some may be quick to dismiss these stories as having little impact on real-world behavior, recent events including the destruction of property, racially fueled attacks against Asian Americans, and demonstrations espousing resistance to public health orders countermand such conclusions. Inspired by narrative theory, we crawl social media sites and news reports and, through the application of automated machine-learning methods, discover the underlying narrative frameworks supporting the generation of these stories. We show how the various narrative frameworks fueling rumors and conspiracy theories rely on the alignment of otherwise disparate domains of knowledge, and consider how they attach to the broader reporting on the pandemic. These alignments and attachments, which can be monitored in near real-time, may be useful for identifying areas in the news that are particularly vulnerable to reinterpretation by conspiracy theorists. Understanding the dynamics of storytelling on social media and the narrative frameworks that provide the generative basis for these stories may also be helpful for devising methods to disrupt their spread.

Related papers

• Event Detection from Social Media for Epidemic Prediction [76.90779562626541]
  We develop a framework to extract and analyze epidemic-related events from social media posts. Experimentation reveals how ED models trained on COVID-based SPEED can effectively detect epidemic events for three unseen epidemics. We show that reporting sharp increases in the extracted events by our framework can provide warnings 4-9 weeks earlier than the WHO epidemic declaration for Monkeypox.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T06:31:17Z)
• "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
  We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models. We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z)
• Know it to Defeat it: Exploring Health Rumor Characteristics and Debunking Efforts on Chinese Social Media during COVID-19 Crisis [65.74516068984232]
  We conduct a comprehensive analysis of four months of rumor-related online discussion during COVID-19 on Weibo, a Chinese microblogging site. Results suggest that the dread (cause fear) type of health rumors provoked significantly more discussions and lasted longer than the wish (raise hope) type. We show the efficacy of debunking in suppressing rumor discussions, which is time-sensitive and varies across rumor types and debunkers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-25T14:02:29Z)
• Analysis of External Content in the Vaccination Discussion on Twitter [6.458496335718509]
  The spread of coronavirus and anti-vaccine conspiracies online hindered the pandemic. We examined the content of external articles shared on Twitter from February to June 2020.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-19T22:47:17Z)
• Misinfo Belief Frames: A Case Study on Covid & Climate News [49.979419711713795]
  We propose a formalism for understanding how readers perceive the reliability of news and the impact of misinformation. We introduce the Misinfo Belief Frames (MBF) corpus, a dataset of 66k inferences over 23.5k headlines. Our results using large-scale language modeling to predict misinformation frames show that machine-generated inferences can influence readers' trust in news headlines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-18T09:50:11Z)
• The Truth is Out There: Investigating Conspiracy Theories in Text Generation [66.01545519772527]
  We investigate the propensity for language models to generate conspiracy theory text. Our study focuses on testing these models for the elicitation of conspiracy theories. We introduce a new dataset consisting of conspiracy theory topics, machine-generated conspiracy theories, and human-written conspiracy theories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T05:47:39Z)
• "Thought I'd Share First" and Other Conspiracy Theory Tweets from the COVID-19 Infodemic: Exploratory Study [0.0]
  Health-related misinformation threatens adherence to public health messaging. Monitoring misinformation on social media is critical to understanding the evolution of ideas that have potentially negative public health impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-14T17:24:59Z)
• Fighting the COVID-19 Infodemic in Social Media: A Holistic Perspective and a Call to Arms [42.7332883578842]
  With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, people turned to social media to read and to share timely information. There was also a new blending of medical and political misinformation and disinformation, which gave rise to the first global infodemic. This is a complex problem that needs a holistic approach combining the perspectives of journalists, fact-checkers, policymakers, government entities, social media platforms, and society as a whole.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-15T21:18:30Z)
• Analysis of misinformation during the COVID-19 outbreak in China: cultural, social and political entanglements [6.256108383411306]
  COVID-19 resulted in an infodemic, which could erode public trust, impede virus containment, and outlive the pandemic itself. The evolving and fragmented media landscape is a key driver of the spread of misinformation. Our findings shed light on the distinct characteristics of misinformation during the COVID-19 and offer insights into combating misinformation in China and across the world at large.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-21T01:34:08Z)
• Advertisers Jump on Coronavirus Bandwagon: Politics, News, and Business [7.056222499095849]
  We examine the alternative narratives around the coronavirus outbreak through advertisements promoted on Facebook. Using the new Facebook Ads Library, we discover advertisers from public health and non-profit sectors, alongside those from news media, politics, and business. We find several instances of possible misinformation, ranging from bioweapons conspiracy theories to unverifiable claims by politicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T14:07:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.