Towards a Collaborative Approach to Decision Making Based on Ontology and Multi-Agent System Application to crisis management

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.07096v1
• Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 10:17:04 GMT
• Title: Towards a Collaborative Approach to Decision Making Based on Ontology and Multi-Agent System Application to crisis management
• Authors: Ahmed Maalel and Henda Ben Gh\'ezala
• Abstract summary: In the insecurity events, the resolution should refer to a plan that defines a general framework of the procedures to be undertaken and instructions to be complied with. This article presents the validation of a collaborative decision-making approach in the context of crisis situations such as road accidents.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The coordination and cooperation of all the stakeholders involved is a decisive point for the control and the resolution of problems. In the insecurity events, the resolution should refer to a plan that defines a general framework of the procedures to be undertaken and the instructions to be complied with; also, a more precise process must be defined by the actors to deal with the case represented by the particular problem of the current situation. Indeed, this process has to cope with a dynamic, unstable and unpredictable environment, due to the heterogeneity and multiplicity of stakeholders, and finally due to their possible geographical distribution. In this article, we will present the first steps of validation of a collaborative decision-making approach in the context of crisis situations such as road accidents. This approach is based on ontologies and multi-agent systems.

Related papers

• Agent-Oriented Planning in Multi-Agent Systems [54.429028104022066]
  We propose a novel framework for agent-oriented planning in multi-agent systems, leveraging a fast task decomposition and allocation process. We integrate a feedback loop into the proposed framework to further enhance the effectiveness and robustness of such a problem-solving process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T04:07:51Z)
• A cooperative strategy for diagnosing the root causes of quality requirement violations in multiagent systems [4.710921988115686]
  We propose a cooperative strategy focused on the identification of the root causes of quality requirement violations in multiagent systems. This strategy allows agents to cooperate with each other in order to identify whether these violations come from service providers, associated components, or the communication infrastructure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T14:41:33Z)
• Online Decision Mediation [72.80902932543474]
  Consider learning a decision support assistant to serve as an intermediary between (oracle) expert behavior and (imperfect) human behavior. In clinical diagnosis, fully-autonomous machine behavior is often beyond ethical affordances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T05:59:43Z)
• CORec-Cri: How collaborative and social technologies can help to contextualize crises? [0.0]
  In this paper, we investigate how collaborative and social technologies help to contextualize crises. We define CORec-Cri (Contextulized Ontology-based Recommender system for crisis management) based on existing work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T15:29:37Z)
• On the Complexity of Multi-Agent Decision Making: From Learning in Games to Partial Monitoring [105.13668993076801]
  A central problem in the theory of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) is to understand what structural conditions and algorithmic principles lead to sample-efficient learning guarantees. We study this question in a general framework for interactive decision making with multiple agents. We show that characterizing the statistical complexity for multi-agent decision making is equivalent to characterizing the statistical complexity of single-agent decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T06:46:22Z)
• Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary Policies [79.60322329952453]
  We show how to develop interpretable representations of how agents make decisions. By understanding the decision-making processes underlying a set of observed trajectories, we cast the policy inference problem as the inverse to this online learning problem. We introduce a practical algorithm for retrospectively estimating such perceived effects, alongside the process through which agents update them. Through application to the analysis of UNOS organ donation acceptance decisions, we demonstrate that our approach can bring valuable insights into the factors that govern decision processes and how they change over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T17:40:42Z)
• Stein Variational Model Predictive Control [130.60527864489168]
  Decision making under uncertainty is critical to real-world, autonomous systems. Model Predictive Control (MPC) methods have demonstrated favorable performance in practice, but remain limited when dealing with complex distributions. We show that this framework leads to successful planning in challenging, non optimal control problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-15T22:36:59Z)
• End-to-End Learning and Intervention in Games [60.41921763076017]
  We provide a unified framework for learning and intervention in games. We propose two approaches, respectively based on explicit and implicit differentiation. The analytical results are validated using several real-world problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T18:39:32Z)
• Optimal Inspection and Maintenance Planning for Deteriorating Structural Components through Dynamic Bayesian Networks and Markov Decision Processes [0.0]
  Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) provide a mathematical methodology for optimal control under uncertain action outcomes and observations. We provide the formulation for developing both infinite and finite horizon POMDPs in a structural reliability context. Results show that POMDPs achieve substantially lower costs as compared to their counterparts, even for traditional problem settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-09T20:03:42Z)
• Deep reinforcement learning driven inspection and maintenance planning under incomplete information and constraints [0.0]
  Determination of inspection and maintenance policies constitutes a complex optimization problem. In this work, these challenges are addressed within a joint framework of constrained Partially Observable Decision Processes (POMDP) and multi-agent Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) The proposed framework is found to outperform well-established policy baselines and facilitate adept prescription of inspection and intervention actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T20:44:07Z)
• On Algorithmic Decision Procedures in Emergency Response Systems in Smart and Connected Communities [21.22596396400625]
  Emergency Response Management (ERM) is a critical problem faced by communities across the globe. We argue that the crucial period of planning for ERM systems is not post-incident, but between incidents. We propose two partially decentralized multi-agent planning algorithms that utilizes and exploit the structure of the dispatch problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T07:04:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.