Hazard recognition in an immersive virtual environment: Framework for the simultaneous analysis of visual search and EEG patterns

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.09494v1
• Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 20:12:38 GMT
• Title: Hazard recognition in an immersive virtual environment: Framework for the simultaneous analysis of visual search and EEG patterns
• Abstract summary: This study presents virtual safety training in an Immersive Virtual Environment (IVE) to enhance worker's hazard recognition skills. A worker wearing a Virtual Reality (VR) device, that is equipped with an eye-tracker, virtually recognizes hazards on simulated construction sites. This platform can analyze the overall performance of the workers in a visual hazard recognition task and identify hazards that need additional intervention for each worker.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Unmanaged hazards in dangerous construction environments proved to be one of the main sources of injuries and accidents. Hazard recognition is crucial to achieve effective safety management and reduce injuries and fatalities in hazardous job sites. Still, there has been lack of effort that can efficiently assist workers in improving their hazard recognition skills. This study presents virtual safety training in an Immersive Virtual Environment (IVE) to enhance worker's hazard recognition skills. A worker wearing a Virtual Reality (VR) device, that is equipped with an eye-tracker, virtually recognizes hazards on simulated construction sites while a brainwave-sensing device records brain activities. This platform can analyze the overall performance of the workers in a visual hazard recognition task and identify hazards that need additional intervention for each worker. This study provides novel insights on how a worker's brain and eye act simultaneously during a visual hazard recognition process. The presented method can take current safety training programs into another level by providing personalized feedback to the workers.

Related papers

• Autonomous VR-Based Risk Detection for Situational Awareness in Dangerous Settings [6.393768354249935]
  Vision Language Models (VLMs) have shown strong potential for scene understanding in safety-critical settings.<n>We present a VR-based Human Robot Interaction framework for studying how VLM-assisted robots can support situational awareness in simulated hazardous environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-18T01:48:25Z)
• Hazard Management in Robot-Assisted Mammography Support [4.4103353984747935]
  MammoBot is an assistive robotic system designed to support patients during X-ray mammography.<n>This paper presents a hazard management methodology for MammoBot.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-07T11:52:02Z)
• Safety in Embodied AI: A Survey of Risks, Attacks, and Defenses [168.50301366360344]
  Embodied Artificial Intelligence (Embodied AI) integrates perception, cognition, planning, and interaction into agents that operate in safety-critical environments.<n>Unlike digital AI systems, embodied agents must act under uncertain sensing, incomplete knowledge, and dynamic human-robot interactions.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive review of safety research in embodied AI, examining attacks and defenses across the full embodied pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-28T13:21:44Z)
• The Missing Half: Unveiling Training-time Implicit Safety Risks Beyond Deployment [148.80266237240713]
  implicit training-time safety risks are driven by a model's internal incentives and contextual background information.<n>We present the first systematic study of this problem, introducing a taxonomy with five risk levels, ten fine-grained risk categories, and three incentive types.<n>Our results identify an overlooked yet urgent safety challenge in training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-04T04:23:58Z)
• MADRA: Multi-Agent Debate for Risk-Aware Embodied Planning [3.058137447286947]
  Existing methods often suffer from either high computational costs due to preference alignment training or over-rejection when using single-agent safety prompts.<n>We propose MADRA, a training-free Multi-Agent Debate Risk Assessment framework.<n>Our work provides a scalable, model-agnostic solution for building trustworthy embodied agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-26T14:51:37Z)
• Context-Aware Risk Estimation in Home Environments: A Probabilistic Framework for Service Robots [2.5695499302569327]
  We present a novel framework for estimating accident-prone regions in everyday indoor scenes, aimed at improving real-time risk awareness in service robots.<n>Our approach models object-level risk and context through a semantic graph-based propagation algorithm.<n>Our method is validated on a dataset with human-annotated risk regions, achieving a binary risk detection accuracy of 75%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T11:14:05Z)
• AGENTSAFE: Benchmarking the Safety of Embodied Agents on Hazardous Instructions [76.74726258534142]
  We propose AGENTSAFE, the first benchmark for evaluating the safety of embodied VLM agents under hazardous instructions.<n> AGENTSAFE simulates realistic agent-environment interactions within a simulation sandbox.<n> benchmark includes 45 adversarial scenarios, 1,350 hazardous tasks, and 8,100 hazardous instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T16:37:35Z)
• Using Vision Language Models for Safety Hazard Identification in Construction [1.2343292905447238]
  We propose and experimentally validated a Vision Language Model (VLM)-based framework for the identification of construction hazards. We evaluate state-of-the-art VLMs, including GPT-4o, Gemini, Llama 3.2, and InternVL2, using a custom dataset of 1100 construction site images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T05:11:23Z)
• An Approach to Technical AGI Safety and Security [72.83728459135101]
  We develop an approach to address the risk of harms consequential enough to significantly harm humanity. We focus on technical approaches to misuse and misalignment. We briefly outline how these ingredients could be combined to produce safety cases for AGI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T15:59:31Z)
• Bresa: Bio-inspired Reflexive Safe Reinforcement Learning for Contact-Rich Robotic Tasks [14.311037569372369]
  We propose Bresa, a Bio-inspired Reflexive Hierarchical Safe RL method inspired by biological reflexes. Our method decouples task learning from safety learning, incorporating a safety critic network that evaluates action risks and operates at a higher frequency than the task solver. Our results show that Bresa outperforms the baseline, providing a robust and reflexive safety mechanism that bridges the gap between high-level planning and low-level execution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T21:11:32Z)
• Open Problems in Machine Unlearning for AI Safety [61.43515658834902]
  Machine unlearning -- the ability to selectively forget or suppress specific types of knowledge -- has shown promise for privacy and data removal tasks. In this paper, we identify key limitations that prevent unlearning from serving as a comprehensive solution for AI safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-09T03:59:10Z)
• Don't Let Your Robot be Harmful: Responsible Robotic Manipulation [57.70648477564976]
  Unthinking execution of human instructions in robotic manipulation can lead to severe safety risks. We present Safety-as-policy, which includes (i) a world model to automatically generate scenarios containing safety risks and conduct virtual interactions, and (ii) a mental model to infer consequences with reflections. We show that Safety-as-policy can avoid risks and efficiently complete tasks in both synthetic dataset and real-world experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T12:27:50Z)
• Defining and Evaluating Physical Safety for Large Language Models [62.4971588282174]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to control robotic systems such as drones. Their risks of causing physical threats and harm in real-world applications remain unexplored. We classify the physical safety risks of drones into four categories: (1) human-targeted threats, (2) object-targeted threats, (3) infrastructure attacks, and (4) regulatory violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T17:41:25Z)
• LabSafety Bench: Benchmarking LLMs on Safety Issues in Scientific Labs [80.45174785447136]
  Laboratory accidents pose significant risks to human life and property. Despite advancements in safety training, laboratory personnel may still unknowingly engage in unsafe practices. There is a growing concern about large language models (LLMs) for guidance in various fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T05:21:05Z)
• Hazards in Daily Life? Enabling Robots to Proactively Detect and Resolve Anomalies [26.79399508110069]
  We argue that household robots should proactively detect such hazards or anomalies within the home. We leverage foundational models instead of relying on manually labeled data to build simulated environments. We demonstrate that our generated environment outperforms others in terms of task description and scene diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T19:29:14Z)
• ActSafe: Active Exploration with Safety Constraints for Reinforcement Learning [48.536695794883826]
  We present ActSafe, a novel model-based RL algorithm for safe and efficient exploration. We show that ActSafe guarantees safety during learning while also obtaining a near-optimal policy in finite time. In addition, we propose a practical variant of ActSafe that builds on latest model-based RL advancements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T10:46:02Z)
• EAIRiskBench: Towards Evaluating Physical Risk Awareness for Task Planning of Foundation Model-based Embodied AI Agents [47.69642609574771]
  Embodied artificial intelligence (EAI) integrates advanced AI models into physical entities for real-world interaction. Foundation models as the "brain" of EAI agents for high-level task planning have shown promising results. However, the deployment of these agents in physical environments presents significant safety challenges. This study introduces EAIRiskBench, a novel framework for automated physical risk assessment in EAI scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T13:19:37Z)
• A Deep Learning Approach to Detect Complete Safety Equipment For Construction Workers Based On YOLOv7 [0.0]
  In this study, a deep learning-based technique is presented for identifying safety gear worn by construction workers. The recommended approach uses the YOLO v7 object detection algorithm to precisely locate these safety items. Our trained model performed admirably well, with good precision, recall, and F1-score for safety equipment recognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T20:38:41Z)
• Safe Reinforcement Learning in Black-Box Environments via Adaptive Shielding [5.5929450570003185]
  Training RL agents in unknown, black-box environments poses an even greater safety risk when prior knowledge of the domain/task is unavailable. We introduce ADVICE (Adaptive Shielding with a Contrastive Autoencoder), a novel post-shielding technique that distinguishes safe and unsafe features of state-action pairs during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T13:47:21Z)
• The Last Decade in Review: Tracing the Evolution of Safety Assurance Cases through a Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis [7.431812376079826]
  Safety assurance is of paramount importance across various domains, including automotive, aerospace, and nuclear energy. The use of safety assurance cases allows for verifying the correctness of the created systems capabilities, preventing system failure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T17:34:23Z)
• KnowSafe: Combined Knowledge and Data Driven Hazard Mitigation in Artificial Pancreas Systems [3.146076597280736]
  KnowSafe predicts and mitigates safety hazards resulting from safety-critical malicious attacks or accidental faults targeting a CPS controller. We integrate domain-specific knowledge of safety constraints and context-specific mitigation actions with machine learning (ML) techniques. KnowSafe outperforms the state-of-the-art by achieving higher accuracy in predicting system state trajectories and potential hazards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T16:43:34Z)
• Risk-Driven Design of Perception Systems [47.787943101699966]
  It is important that we design perception systems to minimize errors that reduce the overall safety of the system. We develop a risk-driven approach to designing perception systems that accounts for the effect of perceptual errors on the performance of the fully-integrated, closed-loop system. We evaluate our techniques on a realistic vision-based aircraft detect and avoid application and show that risk-driven design reduces collision risk by 37% over a baseline system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-21T21:14:56Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.