Effect of Annotation Errors on Drone Detection with YOLOv3

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.01059v4
• Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 14:54:00 GMT
• Title: Effect of Annotation Errors on Drone Detection with YOLOv3
• Authors: Aybora Koksal, Kutalmis Gokalp Ince, A. Aydin Alatan
• Abstract summary: In this work, different types of annotation errors for object detection problem are simulated and the performance of a popular state-of-the-art object detector, YOLOv3, is examined. Some inevitable annotation errors in CVPR-2020 Anti-UAV Challenge dataset is also examined in this manner.
• Score: 14.519138724931446
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Following the recent advances in deep networks, object detection and tracking algorithms with deep learning backbones have been improved significantly; however, this rapid development resulted in the necessity of large amounts of annotated labels. Even if the details of such semi-automatic annotation processes for most of these datasets are not known precisely, especially for the video annotations, some automated labeling processes are usually employed. Unfortunately, such approaches might result with erroneous annotations. In this work, different types of annotation errors for object detection problem are simulated and the performance of a popular state-of-the-art object detector, YOLOv3, with erroneous annotations during training and testing stages is examined. Moreover, some inevitable annotation errors in CVPR-2020 Anti-UAV Challenge dataset is also examined in this manner, while proposing a solution to correct such annotation errors of this valuable data set.

Related papers

• SINDER: Repairing the Singular Defects of DINOv2 [61.98878352956125]
  Vision Transformer models trained on large-scale datasets often exhibit artifacts in the patch token they extract. We propose a novel fine-tuning smooth regularization that rectifies structural deficiencies using only a small dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T20:34:23Z)
• GlanceVAD: Exploring Glance Supervision for Label-efficient Video Anomaly Detection [36.73022075416943]
  We present a novel labeling paradigm, termed "glance annotation", to achieve a better balance between anomaly detection accuracy and annotation cost. To assess its effectiveness, we manually annotate the glance annotations for two standard video anomaly detection datasets: UCF-Crime and XD-Violence. We also propose a customized GlanceVAD method, that leverages ssian kernels as the basic unit to compose the temporal anomaly distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T09:57:10Z)
• Generalizable Error Modeling for Human Data Annotation: Evidence From an Industry-Scale Search Data Annotation Program [0.0]
  This paper presents a predictive error model trained to detect potential errors in search relevance annotation tasks. We show that errors can be predicted with moderate model performance (AUC=0.65-0.75) and that model performance generalizes well across applications. We demonstrate the usefulness of the model in the context of auditing, where prioritizing tasks with high predicted error probabilities considerably increases the amount of corrected annotation errors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T21:21:19Z)
• Deep Active Learning with Noisy Oracle in Object Detection [5.5165579223151795]
  We propose a composite active learning framework including a label review module for deep object detection. We show that utilizing part of the annotation budget to correct the noisy annotations partially in the active dataset leads to early improvements in model performance. In our experiments we achieve improvements of up to 4.5 mAP points of object detection performance by incorporating label reviews at equal annotation budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T13:28:35Z)
• Estimating label quality and errors in semantic segmentation data via any model [19.84626033109009]
  We study methods to score label quality, such that the images with the lowest scores are least likely to be correctly labeled. This helps prioritize what data to review in order to ensure a high-quality training/evaluation dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T07:29:09Z)
• PULL: Reactive Log Anomaly Detection Based On Iterative PU Learning [58.85063149619348]
  We propose PULL, an iterative log analysis method for reactive anomaly detection based on estimated failure time windows. Our evaluation shows that PULL consistently outperforms ten benchmark baselines across three different datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T16:34:43Z)
• Annotation Error Detection: Analyzing the Past and Present for a More Coherent Future [63.99570204416711]
  We reimplement 18 methods for detecting potential annotation errors and evaluate them on 9 English datasets. We define a uniform evaluation setup including a new formalization of the annotation error detection task. We release our datasets and implementations in an easy-to-use and open source software package.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-05T22:31:45Z)
• Omni-DETR: Omni-Supervised Object Detection with Transformers [165.4190908259015]
  We consider the problem of omni-supervised object detection, which can use unlabeled, fully labeled and weakly labeled annotations. Under this unified architecture, different types of weak labels can be leveraged to generate accurate pseudo labels. We have found that weak annotations can help to improve detection performance and a mixture of them can achieve a better trade-off between annotation cost and accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T06:36:09Z)
• DAE : Discriminatory Auto-Encoder for multivariate time-series anomaly detection in air transportation [68.8204255655161]
  We propose a novel anomaly detection model called Discriminatory Auto-Encoder (DAE) It uses the baseline of a regular LSTM-based auto-encoder but with several decoders, each getting data of a specific flight phase. Results show that the DAE achieves better results in both accuracy and speed of detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-08T14:07:55Z)
• EHSOD: CAM-Guided End-to-end Hybrid-Supervised Object Detection with Cascade Refinement [53.69674636044927]
  We present EHSOD, an end-to-end hybrid-supervised object detection system. It can be trained in one shot on both fully and weakly-annotated data. It achieves comparable results on multiple object detection benchmarks with only 30% fully-annotated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-18T08:04:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.