Benchmarking Machine Reading Comprehension: A Psychological Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.01912v2
• Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:06:28 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking Machine Reading Comprehension: A Psychological Perspective
• Authors: Saku Sugawara, Pontus Stenetorp, Akiko Aizawa
• Abstract summary: Machine reading comprehension (MRC) has received considerable attention as a benchmark for natural language understanding. The conventional task design of MRC lacks explainability beyond the model interpretation. This paper provides a theoretical basis for the design of MRC datasets based on psychology as well as psychometrics.
• Score: 45.85089157315507
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine reading comprehension (MRC) has received considerable attention as a benchmark for natural language understanding. However, the conventional task design of MRC lacks explainability beyond the model interpretation, i.e., reading comprehension by a model cannot be explained in human terms. To this end, this position paper provides a theoretical basis for the design of MRC datasets based on psychology as well as psychometrics, and summarizes it in terms of the prerequisites for benchmarking MRC. We conclude that future datasets should (i) evaluate the capability of the model for constructing a coherent and grounded representation to understand context-dependent situations and (ii) ensure substantive validity by shortcut-proof questions and explanation as a part of the task design.

Related papers

• The Foundations of Tokenization: Statistical and Computational Concerns [51.370165245628975]
  Tokenization is a critical step in the NLP pipeline. Despite its recognized importance as a standard representation method in NLP, the theoretical underpinnings of tokenization are not yet fully understood. The present paper contributes to addressing this theoretical gap by proposing a unified formal framework for representing and analyzing tokenizer models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T11:12:28Z)
• Self-supervised Interpretable Concept-based Models for Text Classification [9.340843984411137]
  This paper proposes a self-supervised Interpretable Concept Embedding Models (ICEMs) We leverage the generalization abilities of Large-Language Models to predict the concepts labels in a self-supervised way. ICEMs can be trained in a self-supervised way achieving similar performance to fully supervised concept-based models and end-to-end black-box ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T14:04:53Z)
• Towards a Unified Framework for Evaluating Explanations [0.6138671548064356]
  We argue that explanations serve as mediators between models and stakeholders, whether for intrinsically interpretable models or opaque black-box models. We illustrate these criteria, as well as specific evaluation methods, using examples from an ongoing study of an interpretable neural network for predicting a particular learner behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T21:49:28Z)
• Interpreting Pretrained Language Models via Concept Bottlenecks [55.47515772358389]
  Pretrained language models (PLMs) have made significant strides in various natural language processing tasks. The lack of interpretability due to their black-box'' nature poses challenges for responsible implementation. We propose a novel approach to interpreting PLMs by employing high-level, meaningful concepts that are easily understandable for humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T20:41:18Z)
• Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing. This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
• Relational Concept Bottleneck Models [13.311396882130033]
  Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) are not designed to solve problems. R-CBMs are capable of both representing standard CBMs and relational GNNs. In particular, we show that R-CBMs support the generation of concept-based explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T08:25:33Z)
• ExSum: From Local Explanations to Model Understanding [6.23934576145261]
  Interpretability methods are developed to understand the working mechanisms of black-box models. Fulfilling this goal requires both that the explanations generated by these methods are correct and that people can easily and reliably understand them. We introduce explanation summary (ExSum), a mathematical framework for quantifying model understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-30T02:07:20Z)
• Explainability in Process Outcome Prediction: Guidelines to Obtain Interpretable and Faithful Models [77.34726150561087]
  We define explainability through the interpretability of the explanations and the faithfulness of the explainability model in the field of process outcome prediction. This paper contributes a set of guidelines named X-MOP which allows selecting the appropriate model based on the event log specifications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-30T05:59:50Z)
• Multilingual Multi-Aspect Explainability Analyses on Machine Reading Comprehension Models [76.48370548802464]
  This paper focuses on conducting a series of analytical experiments to examine the relations between the multi-head self-attention and the final MRC system performance. We discover that passage-to-question and passage understanding attentions are the most important ones in the question answering process. Through comprehensive visualizations and case studies, we also observe several general findings on the attention maps, which can be helpful to understand how these models solve the questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-26T04:23:57Z)
• Understanding Interpretability by generalized distillation in Supervised Classification [3.5473853445215897]
  Recent interpretation strategies focus on human understanding of the underlying decision mechanisms of the complex Machine Learning models. We propose an interpretation-by-distillation formulation that is defined relative to other ML models. We evaluate our proposed framework on the MNIST, Fashion-MNIST and Stanford40 datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-05T17:42:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.