Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on
Twitter
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.06986v2
- Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 10:26:50 GMT
- Title: Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on
Twitter
- Authors: Philipp Wicke and Marianna M. Bolognesi
- Abstract summary: War-related terminology is commonly used to frame the discourse around epidemics and diseases.
We present an analysis of the discourse around #Covid-19 based on a corpus of 200k tweets posted on Twitter during March and April 2020.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Doctors and nurses in these weeks are busy in the trenches, fighting against
a new invisible enemy: Covid-19. Cities are locked down and civilians are
besieged in their own homes, to prevent the spreading of the virus. War-related
terminology is commonly used to frame the discourse around epidemics and
diseases. Arguably the discourse around the current epidemic will make use of
war-related metaphors too,not only in public discourse and the media, but also
in the tweets written by non-experts of mass communication. We hereby present
an analysis of the discourse around #Covid-19, based on a corpus of 200k tweets
posted on Twitter during March and April 2020. Using topic modelling we first
analyze the topics around which the discourse can be classified. Then, we show
that the WAR framing is used to talk about specific topics, such as the virus
treatment, but not others, such as the effects of social distancing on the
population. We then measure and compare the popularity of the WAR frame to
three alternative figurative frames (MONSTER, STORM and TSUNAMI) and a literal
frame used as control (FAMILY). The results show that while the FAMILY literal
frame covers a wider portion of the corpus, among the figurative framings WAR
is the most frequently used, and thus arguably the most conventional one.
However, we conclude, this frame is not apt to elaborate the discourse around
many aspects involved in the current situation. Therefore, we conclude, in line
with previous suggestions, a plethora of framing options, or a metaphor menu,
may facilitate the communication of various aspects involved in the
Covid-19-related discourse on the social media, and thus support civilians in
the expression of their feelings, opinions and ideas during the current
pandemic.
Related papers
- SPEED++: A Multilingual Event Extraction Framework for Epidemic Prediction and Preparedness [73.73883111570458]
We introduce the first multilingual Event Extraction framework for extracting epidemic event information for a wide range of diseases and languages.
Annotating data in every language is infeasible; thus we develop zero-shot cross-lingual cross-disease models.
Our framework can provide epidemic warnings for COVID-19 in its earliest stages in Dec 2019 from Chinese Weibo posts without any training in Chinese.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T03:03:54Z) - Framing Analysis of Health-Related Narratives: Conspiracy versus
Mainstream Media [3.3181276611945263]
We investigate how the framing of health-related topics, such as COVID-19 and other diseases, differs between conspiracy and mainstream websites.
We find that health-related narratives in conspiracy media are predominantly framed in terms of beliefs, while mainstream media tend to present them in terms of science.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-18T14:56:23Z) - "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the
Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models.
We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z) - Know it to Defeat it: Exploring Health Rumor Characteristics and
Debunking Efforts on Chinese Social Media during COVID-19 Crisis [65.74516068984232]
We conduct a comprehensive analysis of four months of rumor-related online discussion during COVID-19 on Weibo, a Chinese microblogging site.
Results suggest that the dread (cause fear) type of health rumors provoked significantly more discussions and lasted longer than the wish (raise hope) type.
We show the efficacy of debunking in suppressing rumor discussions, which is time-sensitive and varies across rumor types and debunkers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-25T14:02:29Z) - Covid-19 Discourse on Twitter: How the Topics, Sentiments, Subjectivity,
and Figurative Frames Changed Over Time [0.0]
We show how the topics associated with the development of the pandemic changed through time, using topic modeling.
We show how the average subjectivity of the tweets increased linearly and fourth, how the popular and frequently used figurative frame of WAR changed when real riots and fights entered the discourse.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-16T10:22:39Z) - Leveraging Natural Language Processing to Mine Issues on Twitter During
the COVID-19 Pandemic [0.3674863913115431]
The recent global outbreak of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has spread to all corners of the globe.
To understand the public concerns and responses to the pandemic, a system that can leverage machine learning techniques to filter out irrelevant tweets is needed.
In this study, we constructed a system to identify the relevant tweets related to the COVID-19 pandemic throughout January 1st, 2020 to April 30th, 2020.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-31T22:26:26Z) - Detecting Topic and Sentiment Dynamics Due to COVID-19 Pandemic Using
Social Media [14.662523926129117]
We analyze the topic and sentiment dynamics due to COVID-19 from the massive social media posts.
Some topics like stay safe home" are dominated with positive sentiment.
The others such as people death" are consistently showing negative sentiment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-05T12:05:30Z) - Analyzing COVID-19 on Online Social Media: Trends, Sentiments and
Emotions [44.92240076313168]
We analyze the affective trajectories of the American people and the Chinese people based on Twitter and Weibo posts between January 20th, 2020 and May 11th 2020.
By contrasting two very different countries, China and the Unites States, we reveal sharp differences in people's views on COVID-19 in different cultures.
Our study provides a computational approach to unveiling public emotions and concerns on the pandemic in real-time, which would potentially help policy-makers better understand people's need and thus make optimal policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-29T09:24:38Z) - Twitter discussions and emotions about COVID-19 pandemic: a machine
learning approach [0.0]
We analyze 4 million Twitter messages related to the COVID-19 pandemic using a list of 25 hashtags such as "coronavirus," "COVID-19," "quarantine" from March 1 to April 21 in 2020.
We identify 13 discussion topics and categorize them into five different themes, such as "public health measures to slow the spread of COVID-19," "social stigma associated with COVID-19," "coronavirus news cases and deaths," "COVID-19 in the United States," and "coronavirus cases in the rest of the world"
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-26T16:10:02Z) - VisualCOMET: Reasoning about the Dynamic Context of a Still Image [97.20800299330078]
We propose VisualComet, a framework for visual commonsense reasoning.
VisualComet predicts events that might have happened before, events that might happen next, and the intents of the people at present.
We introduce the first large-scale repository of Visual Commonsense Graphs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-22T19:02:20Z) - The Ivory Tower Lost: How College Students Respond Differently than the
General Public to the COVID-19 Pandemic [66.80677233314002]
Pandemic of the novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has presented governments with ultimate challenges.
In the United States, the country with the highest confirmed COVID-19 infection cases, a nationwide social distancing protocol has been implemented by the President.
This paper aims to discover the social implications of this unprecedented disruption in our interactive society by mining people's opinions on social media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-21T13:02:38Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.