The International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging Knee MRI Segmentation Challenge: A Multi-Institute Evaluation and Analysis Framework on a Standardized Dataset

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14003v2
• Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 19:24:14 GMT
• Title: The International Workshop on Osteoarthritis Imaging Knee MRI Segmentation Challenge: A Multi-Institute Evaluation and Analysis Framework on a Standardized Dataset
• Authors: Arjun D. Desai, Francesco Caliva, Claudia Iriondo, Naji Khosravan, Aliasghar Mortazi, Sachin Jambawalikar, Drew Torigian, Jutta Ellermann, Mehmet Akcakaya, Ulas Bagci, Radhika Tibrewala, Io Flament, Matthew O`Brien, Sharmila Majumdar, Mathias Perslev, Akshay Pai, Christian Igel, Erik B. Dam, Sibaji Gaj, Mingrui Yang, Kunio Nakamura, Xiaojuan Li, Cem M. Deniz, Vladimir Juras, Ravinder Regatte, Garry E. Gold, Brian A. Hargreaves, Valentina Pedoia, Akshay S. Chaudhari
• Abstract summary: dataset consisted of 3D knee MRI from 88 subjects at two timepoints with ground-truth articular (femoral, tibial, patellar) cartilage and meniscus segmentations was standardized. Challenge submissions and a majority-vote ensemble were evaluated using Dice score, average symmetric surface distance, volumetric overlap error, and coefficient of variation on a hold-out test set.
• Score: 10.527298477861564
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Purpose: To organize a knee MRI segmentation challenge for characterizing the semantic and clinical efficacy of automatic segmentation methods relevant for monitoring osteoarthritis progression. Methods: A dataset partition consisting of 3D knee MRI from 88 subjects at two timepoints with ground-truth articular (femoral, tibial, patellar) cartilage and meniscus segmentations was standardized. Challenge submissions and a majority-vote ensemble were evaluated using Dice score, average symmetric surface distance, volumetric overlap error, and coefficient of variation on a hold-out test set. Similarities in network segmentations were evaluated using pairwise Dice correlations. Articular cartilage thickness was computed per-scan and longitudinally. Correlation between thickness error and segmentation metrics was measured using Pearson's coefficient. Two empirical upper bounds for ensemble performance were computed using combinations of model outputs that consolidated true positives and true negatives. Results: Six teams (T1-T6) submitted entries for the challenge. No significant differences were observed across all segmentation metrics for all tissues (p=1.0) among the four top-performing networks (T2, T3, T4, T6). Dice correlations between network pairs were high (>0.85). Per-scan thickness errors were negligible among T1-T4 (p=0.99) and longitudinal changes showed minimal bias (<0.03mm). Low correlations (<0.41) were observed between segmentation metrics and thickness error. The majority-vote ensemble was comparable to top performing networks (p=1.0). Empirical upper bound performances were similar for both combinations (p=1.0). Conclusion: Diverse networks learned to segment the knee similarly where high segmentation accuracy did not correlate to cartilage thickness accuracy. Voting ensembles did not outperform individual networks but may help regularize individual models.

Related papers

• TotalSegmentator MRI: Sequence-Independent Segmentation of 59 Anatomical Structures in MR images [62.53931644063323]
  In this study we extended the capabilities of TotalSegmentator to MR images. We trained an nnU-Net segmentation algorithm on this dataset and calculated similarity coefficients (Dice) to evaluate the model's performance. The model significantly outperformed two other publicly available segmentation models (Dice score 0.824 versus 0.762; p0.001 and 0.762 versus 0.542; p)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T20:15:54Z)
• Minimally Interactive Segmentation of Soft-Tissue Tumors on CT and MRI using Deep Learning [0.0]
  We develop a minimally interactive deep learning-based segmentation method for soft-tissue tumors (STTs) on CT and MRI. The method requires the user to click six points near the tumor's extreme boundaries to serve as input for a Convolutional Neural Network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:15:28Z)
• TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT images [48.50994220135258]
  We present a deep learning segmentation model for body CT images. The model can segment 104 anatomical structures relevant for use cases such as organ volumetry, disease characterization, and surgical or radiotherapy planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T15:16:40Z)
• CNN-based fully automatic wrist cartilage volume quantification in MR Image [55.41644538483948]
  The U-net convolutional neural network with additional attention layers provides the best wrist cartilage segmentation performance. The error of cartilage volume measurement should be assessed independently using a non-MRI method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-22T14:19:06Z)
• Automated segmentation of 3-D body composition on computed tomography [0.0]
  Five different body compositions were manually annotated (VAT, SAT, IMAT, SM, and bone) Ten-fold cross-validation method was used to develop and validate the performance of several convolutional neural networks (CNNs) Among the three CNN models, UNet demonstrated the best overall performance in jointly segmenting the five body compositions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T15:38:27Z)
• Two-Stage Mesh Deep Learning for Automated Tooth Segmentation and Landmark Localization on 3D Intraoral Scans [56.55092443401416]
  emphiMeshSegNet in the first stage of TS-MDL reached an averaged Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) at 0.953pm0.076$, significantly outperforming the original MeshSegNet. PointNet-Reg achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of $0.623pm0.718, mm$ in distances between the prediction and ground truth for $44$ landmarks, which is superior compared with other networks for landmark detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-24T13:00:26Z)
• A Deep Learning-Based Approach to Extracting Periosteal and Endosteal Contours of Proximal Femur in Quantitative CT Images [25.76523855274612]
  A three-dimensional (3D) end-to-end fully convolutional neural network was developed for our segmentation task. Two models with the same network structures were trained and they achieved a dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 97.87% and 96.49% for the periosteal and endosteal contours, respectively. It demonstrated a strong potential for clinical use, including the hip fracture risk prediction and finite element analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-03T10:23:41Z)
• MSED: a multi-modal sleep event detection model for clinical sleep analysis [62.997667081978825]
  We designed a single deep neural network architecture to jointly detect sleep events in a polysomnogram. The performance of the model was quantified by F1, precision, and recall scores, and by correlating index values to clinical values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-07T13:08:44Z)
• Open source software for automatic subregional assessment of knee cartilage degradation using quantitative T2 relaxometry and deep learning [0.0]
  We trained a neural network to segment femoral cartilage from MESE MRIs. Cartilage was divided into 12 subregions along medial-lateral, superficial-deep, and anterior-central-posterior boundaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-22T23:08:41Z)
• DONet: Dual Objective Networks for Skin Lesion Segmentation [77.9806410198298]
  We propose a simple yet effective framework, named Dual Objective Networks (DONet), to improve the skin lesion segmentation. Our DONet adopts two symmetric decoders to produce different predictions for approaching different objectives. To address the challenge of large variety of lesion scales and shapes in dermoscopic images, we additionally propose a recurrent context encoding module (RCEM)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-19T06:02:46Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.