Comparison of Image Quality Models for Optimization of Image Processing Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.01338v3
• Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:59:48 GMT
• Title: Comparison of Image Quality Models for Optimization of Image Processing Systems
• Authors: Keyan Ding, Kede Ma, Shiqi Wang, Eero P. Simoncelli
• Abstract summary: We use eleven full-reference IQA models to train deep neural networks for four low-level vision tasks. Subjective testing on the optimized images allows us to rank the competing models in terms of their perceptual performance.
• Score: 41.57409136781606
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The performance of objective image quality assessment (IQA) models has been evaluated primarily by comparing model predictions to human quality judgments. Perceptual datasets gathered for this purpose have provided useful benchmarks for improving IQA methods, but their heavy use creates a risk of overfitting. Here, we perform a large-scale comparison of IQA models in terms of their use as objectives for the optimization of image processing algorithms. Specifically, we use eleven full-reference IQA models to train deep neural networks for four low-level vision tasks: denoising, deblurring, super-resolution, and compression. Subjective testing on the optimized images allows us to rank the competing models in terms of their perceptual performance, elucidate their relative advantages and disadvantages in these tasks, and propose a set of desirable properties for incorporation into future IQA models.

Related papers

• ATTIQA: Generalizable Image Quality Feature Extractor using Attribute-aware Pretraining [25.680035174334886]
  In no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA), the challenge of limited dataset sizes hampers the development of robust and generalizable models. We propose a novel pretraining framework that constructs a generalizable representation for IQA by selectively extracting quality-related knowledge. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple IQA datasets and exhibits remarkable generalization capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-03T06:03:57Z)
• Adaptive Image Quality Assessment via Teaching Large Multimodal Model to Compare [99.57567498494448]
  We introduce Compare2Score, an all-around LMM-based no-reference IQA model. During training, we generate scaled-up comparative instructions by comparing images from the same IQA dataset. Experiments on nine IQA datasets validate that the Compare2Score effectively bridges text-defined comparative levels during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T17:26:09Z)
• Descriptive Image Quality Assessment in the Wild [25.503311093471076]
  VLM-based Image Quality Assessment (IQA) seeks to describe image quality linguistically to align with human expression. We introduce Depicted image Quality Assessment in the Wild (DepictQA-Wild) Our method includes a multi-functional IQA task paradigm that encompasses both assessment and comparison tasks, brief and detailed responses, full-reference and non-reference scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T07:49:15Z)
• Opinion-Unaware Blind Image Quality Assessment using Multi-Scale Deep Feature Statistics [54.08757792080732]
  We propose integrating deep features from pre-trained visual models with a statistical analysis model to achieve opinion-unaware BIQA (OU-BIQA) Our proposed model exhibits superior consistency with human visual perception compared to state-of-the-art BIQA models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T06:09:34Z)
• Comparison of No-Reference Image Quality Models via MAP Estimation in Diffusion Latents [99.19391983670569]
  We show that NR-IQA models can be plugged into the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation framework for image enhancement. Different NR-IQA models are likely to induce different enhanced images, which are ultimately subject to psychophysical testing. This leads to a new computational method for comparing NR-IQA models within the analysis-by-synthesis framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T03:35:41Z)
• Optimization-Based Improvement of Face Image Quality Assessment Techniques [5.831942593046074]
  Face image quality assessment (FIQA) techniques try to infer sample-quality information from the input face images that can aid with the recognition process. We present in this paper a supervised quality-label optimization approach, aimed at improving the performance of existing FIQA techniques. We evaluate the proposed approach in comprehensive experiments with six state-of-the-art FIQA approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T08:06:12Z)
• Conformer and Blind Noisy Students for Improved Image Quality Assessment [80.57006406834466]
  Learning-based approaches for perceptual image quality assessment (IQA) usually require both the distorted and reference image for measuring the perceptual quality accurately. In this work, we explore the performance of transformer-based full-reference IQA models. We also propose a method for IQA based on semi-supervised knowledge distillation from full-reference teacher models into blind student models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T10:21:08Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wild [98.48284827503409]
  We develop a textitunified BIQA model and an approach of training it for both synthetic and realistic distortions. We employ the fidelity loss to optimize a deep neural network for BIQA over a large number of such image pairs. Experiments on six IQA databases show the promise of the learned method in blindly assessing image quality in the laboratory and wild.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-28T13:35:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.