Do not let the history haunt you -- Mitigating Compounding Errors in Conversational Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.05754v1
• Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 13:29:38 GMT
• Title: Do not let the history haunt you -- Mitigating Compounding Errors in Conversational Question Answering
• Authors: Angrosh Mandya, James O'Neill, Danushka Bollegala, and Frans Coenen
• Abstract summary: We find that compounding errors occur when using previously predicted answers at test time. We propose a sampling strategy that dynamically selects between target answers and model predictions during training.
• Score: 17.36904526340775
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Conversational Question Answering (CoQA) task involves answering a sequence of inter-related conversational questions about a contextual paragraph. Although existing approaches employ human-written ground-truth answers for answering conversational questions at test time, in a realistic scenario, the CoQA model will not have any access to ground-truth answers for the previous questions, compelling the model to rely upon its own previously predicted answers for answering the subsequent questions. In this paper, we find that compounding errors occur when using previously predicted answers at test time, significantly lowering the performance of CoQA systems. To solve this problem, we propose a sampling strategy that dynamically selects between target answers and model predictions during training, thereby closely simulating the situation at test time. Further, we analyse the severity of this phenomena as a function of the question type, conversation length and domain type.

Related papers

• Open Domain Question Answering with Conflicting Contexts [55.739842087655774]
  We find that as much as 25% of unambiguous, open domain questions can lead to conflicting contexts when retrieved using Google Search. We ask our annotators to provide explanations for their selections of correct answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T07:24:28Z)
• Question Answering in Natural Language: the Special Case of Temporal Expressions [0.0]
  Our work aims to leverage a popular approach used for general question answering, answer extraction, in order to find answers to temporal questions within a paragraph. To train our model, we propose a new dataset, inspired by SQuAD, specifically tailored to provide rich temporal information. Our evaluation shows that a deep learning model trained to perform pattern matching, often used in general question answering, can be adapted to temporal question answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T16:26:24Z)
• Event Extraction as Question Generation and Answering [72.04433206754489]
  Recent work on Event Extraction has reframed the task as Question Answering (QA) We propose QGA-EE, which enables a Question Generation (QG) model to generate questions that incorporate rich contextual information instead of using fixed templates. Experiments show that QGA-EE outperforms all prior single-task-based models on the ACE05 English dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T01:46:15Z)
• Keeping the Questions Conversational: Using Structured Representations to Resolve Dependency in Conversational Question Answering [26.997542897342164]
  We propose a novel framework, CONVSR (CONVQA using Structured Representations) for capturing and generating intermediate representations as conversational cues. We test our model on the QuAC and CANARD datasets and illustrate by experimental results that our proposed framework achieves a better F1 score than the standard question rewriting model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-14T13:42:32Z)
• Realistic Conversational Question Answering with Answer Selection based on Calibrated Confidence and Uncertainty Measurement [54.55643652781891]
  Conversational Question Answering (ConvQA) models aim at answering a question with its relevant paragraph and previous question-answer pairs that occurred during conversation multiple times. We propose to filter out inaccurate answers in the conversation history based on their estimated confidences and uncertainties from the ConvQA model. We validate our models, Answer Selection-based realistic Conversation Question Answering, on two standard ConvQA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-10T09:42:07Z)
• CREPE: Open-Domain Question Answering with False Presuppositions [92.20501870319765]
  We introduce CREPE, a QA dataset containing a natural distribution of presupposition failures from online information-seeking forums. We find that 25% of questions contain false presuppositions, and provide annotations for these presuppositions and their corrections. We show that adaptations of existing open-domain QA models can find presuppositions moderately well, but struggle when predicting whether a presupposition is factually correct.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-30T18:54:49Z)
• TASA: Deceiving Question Answering Models by Twin Answer Sentences Attack [93.50174324435321]
  We present Twin Answer Sentences Attack (TASA), an adversarial attack method for question answering (QA) models. TASA produces fluent and grammatical adversarial contexts while maintaining gold answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T07:16:30Z)
• Conversational QA Dataset Generation with Answer Revision [2.5838973036257458]
  We introduce a novel framework that extracts question-worthy phrases from a passage and then generates corresponding questions considering previous conversations. Our framework revises the extracted answers after generating questions so that answers exactly match paired questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-23T04:05:38Z)
• QAConv: Question Answering on Informative Conversations [85.2923607672282]
  We focus on informative conversations including business emails, panel discussions, and work channels. In total, we collect 34,204 QA pairs, including span-based, free-form, and unanswerable questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-14T15:53:05Z)
• A Wrong Answer or a Wrong Question? An Intricate Relationship between Question Reformulation and Answer Selection in Conversational Question Answering [15.355557454305776]
  We show that question rewriting (QR) of the conversational context allows to shed more light on this phenomenon. We present the results of this analysis on the TREC CAsT and QuAC (CANARD) datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-13T06:29:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.