Evaluating and Improving Adversarial Robustness of Machine
Learning-Based Network Intrusion Detectors
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.07519v4
- Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 07:25:11 GMT
- Title: Evaluating and Improving Adversarial Robustness of Machine
Learning-Based Network Intrusion Detectors
- Authors: Dongqi Han, Zhiliang Wang, Ying Zhong, Wenqi Chen, Jiahai Yang,
Shuqiang Lu, Xingang Shi, Xia Yin
- Abstract summary: We study the first systematic study of the gray/black-box traffic-space adversarial attacks to evaluate the robustness of ML-based NIDSs.
Our work outperforms previous ones in the following aspects.
We also propose a defense scheme against adversarial attacks to improve system robustness.
- Score: 21.86766733460335
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Machine learning (ML), especially deep learning (DL) techniques have been
increasingly used in anomaly-based network intrusion detection systems (NIDS).
However, ML/DL has shown to be extremely vulnerable to adversarial attacks,
especially in such security-sensitive systems. Many adversarial attacks have
been proposed to evaluate the robustness of ML-based NIDSs. Unfortunately,
existing attacks mostly focused on feature-space and/or white-box attacks,
which make impractical assumptions in real-world scenarios, leaving the study
on practical gray/black-box attacks largely unexplored.
To bridge this gap, we conduct the first systematic study of the
gray/black-box traffic-space adversarial attacks to evaluate the robustness of
ML-based NIDSs. Our work outperforms previous ones in the following aspects:
(i) practical-the proposed attack can automatically mutate original traffic
with extremely limited knowledge and affordable overhead while preserving its
functionality; (ii) generic-the proposed attack is effective for evaluating the
robustness of various NIDSs using diverse ML/DL models and non-payload-based
features; (iii) explainable-we propose an explanation method for the fragile
robustness of ML-based NIDSs. Based on this, we also propose a defense scheme
against adversarial attacks to improve system robustness. We extensively
evaluate the robustness of various NIDSs using diverse feature sets and ML/DL
models. Experimental results show our attack is effective (e.g., >97% evasion
rate in half cases for Kitsune, a state-of-the-art NIDS) with affordable
execution cost and the proposed defense method can effectively mitigate such
attacks (evasion rate is reduced by >50% in most cases).
Related papers
- Attention Tracker: Detecting Prompt Injection Attacks in LLMs [62.247841717696765]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized various domains but remain vulnerable to prompt injection attacks.
We introduce the concept of the distraction effect, where specific attention heads shift focus from the original instruction to the injected instruction.
We propose Attention Tracker, a training-free detection method that tracks attention patterns on instruction to detect prompt injection attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-01T04:05:59Z) - MirrorCheck: Efficient Adversarial Defense for Vision-Language Models [55.73581212134293]
We propose a novel, yet elegantly simple approach for detecting adversarial samples in Vision-Language Models.
Our method leverages Text-to-Image (T2I) models to generate images based on captions produced by target VLMs.
Empirical evaluations conducted on different datasets validate the efficacy of our approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T15:55:04Z) - Meta Invariance Defense Towards Generalizable Robustness to Unknown Adversarial Attacks [62.036798488144306]
Current defense mainly focuses on the known attacks, but the adversarial robustness to the unknown attacks is seriously overlooked.
We propose an attack-agnostic defense method named Meta Invariance Defense (MID)
We show that MID simultaneously achieves robustness to the imperceptible adversarial perturbations in high-level image classification and attack-suppression in low-level robust image regeneration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-04T10:10:38Z) - Untargeted White-box Adversarial Attack with Heuristic Defence Methods
in Real-time Deep Learning based Network Intrusion Detection System [0.0]
In Adversarial Machine Learning (AML), malicious actors aim to fool the Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models to produce incorrect predictions.
AML is an emerging research domain, and it has become a necessity for the in-depth study of adversarial attacks.
We implement four powerful adversarial attack techniques, namely, Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM), Jacobian Saliency Map Attack (JSMA), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) and Carlini & Wagner (C&W) in NIDS.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T06:32:56Z) - Enhancing ML-Based DoS Attack Detection Through Combinatorial Fusion
Analysis [2.7973964073307265]
Mitigating Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks is vital for online service security and availability.
We suggest an innovative method, fusion, which combines multiple ML models using advanced algorithms.
Our findings emphasize the potential of this approach to improve DoS attack detection and contribute to stronger defense mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-02T02:21:48Z) - Unveiling Vulnerabilities in Interpretable Deep Learning Systems with
Query-Efficient Black-box Attacks [16.13790238416691]
Interpretable Deep Learning Systems (IDLSes) are designed to make the system more transparent and explainable.
We propose a novel microbial genetic algorithm-based black-box attack against IDLSes that requires no prior knowledge of the target model and its interpretation model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-21T21:09:54Z) - Adversarial Evasion Attacks Practicality in Networks: Testing the Impact of Dynamic Learning [1.6574413179773757]
adversarial attacks aim to trick ML models into producing faulty predictions.
adversarial attacks can compromise ML-based NIDSs.
Our experiments indicate that continuous re-training, even without adversarial training, can reduce the effectiveness of adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T18:32:08Z) - Revisiting DeepFool: generalization and improvement [17.714671419826715]
We introduce a new family of adversarial attacks that strike a balance between effectiveness and computational efficiency.
Our proposed attacks are also suitable for evaluating the robustness of large models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-22T11:49:35Z) - Versatile Weight Attack via Flipping Limited Bits [68.45224286690932]
We study a novel attack paradigm, which modifies model parameters in the deployment stage.
Considering the effectiveness and stealthiness goals, we provide a general formulation to perform the bit-flip based weight attack.
We present two cases of the general formulation with different malicious purposes, i.e., single sample attack (SSA) and triggered samples attack (TSA)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-25T03:24:58Z) - Model-Agnostic Meta-Attack: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Adversarial
Robustness [53.094682754683255]
We propose a Model-Agnostic Meta-Attack (MAMA) approach to discover stronger attack algorithms automatically.
Our method learns the in adversarial attacks parameterized by a recurrent neural network.
We develop a model-agnostic training algorithm to improve the ability of the learned when attacking unseen defenses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-13T13:54:24Z) - A Self-supervised Approach for Adversarial Robustness [105.88250594033053]
Adversarial examples can cause catastrophic mistakes in Deep Neural Network (DNNs) based vision systems.
This paper proposes a self-supervised adversarial training mechanism in the input space.
It provides significant robustness against the textbfunseen adversarial attacks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-08T20:42:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.