Predicting into unknown space? Estimating the area of applicability of spatial prediction models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.07939v1
• Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 10:31:55 GMT
• Title: Predicting into unknown space? Estimating the area of applicability of spatial prediction models
• Authors: Hanna Meyer and Edzer Pebesma
• Abstract summary: We suggest a methodology that delineates the "area of applicability" (AOA) that we define as the area, for which the cross-validation error of the model applies. We test for the ideal threshold by using simulated data and compare the prediction error within the AOA with the cross-validation error of the model.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Predictive modelling using machine learning has become very popular for spatial mapping of the environment. Models are often applied to make predictions far beyond sampling locations where new geographic locations might considerably differ from the training data in their environmental properties. However, areas in the predictor space without support of training data are problematic. Since the model has no knowledge about these environments, predictions have to be considered uncertain. Estimating the area to which a prediction model can be reliably applied is required. Here, we suggest a methodology that delineates the "area of applicability" (AOA) that we define as the area, for which the cross-validation error of the model applies. We first propose a "dissimilarity index" (DI) that is based on the minimum distance to the training data in the predictor space, with predictors being weighted by their respective importance in the model. The AOA is then derived by applying a threshold based on the DI of the training data where the DI is calculated with respect to the cross-validation strategy used for model training. We test for the ideal threshold by using simulated data and compare the prediction error within the AOA with the cross-validation error of the model. We illustrate the approach using a simulated case study. Our simulation study suggests a threshold on DI to define the AOA at the .95 quantile of the DI in the training data. Using this threshold, the prediction error within the AOA is comparable to the cross-validation RMSE of the model, while the cross-validation error does not apply outside the AOA. This applies to models being trained with randomly distributed training data, as well as when training data are clustered in space and where spatial cross-validation is applied. We suggest to report the AOA alongside predictions, complementary to validation measures.

Related papers

• On conditional diffusion models for PDE simulations [53.01911265639582]
  We study score-based diffusion models for forecasting and assimilation of sparse observations. We propose an autoregressive sampling approach that significantly improves performance in forecasting. We also propose a new training strategy for conditional score-based models that achieves stable performance over a range of history lengths.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T18:31:04Z)
• Predictive Performance Test based on the Exhaustive Nested Cross-Validation for High-dimensional data [7.62566998854384]
  Cross-validation is used for several tasks such as estimating the prediction error, tuning the regularization parameter, and selecting the most suitable predictive model. The K-fold cross-validation is a popular CV method but its limitation is that the risk estimates are highly dependent on the partitioning of the data. This study presents an alternative novel predictive performance test and valid confidence intervals based on exhaustive nested cross-validation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T12:28:16Z)
• Out of Distribution Detection via Domain-Informed Gaussian Process State Space Models [22.24457254575906]
  In order for robots to safely navigate in unseen scenarios, it is important to accurately detect out-of-training-distribution (OoD) situations online. We propose a novel approach to embed existing domain knowledge in the kernel and (ii) an OoD online runtime monitor, based on receding-horizon predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T01:02:42Z)
• Transfer Learning with Uncertainty Quantification: Random Effect Calibration of Source to Target (RECaST) [1.8047694351309207]
  We develop a statistical framework for model predictions based on transfer learning, called RECaST. We mathematically and empirically demonstrate the validity of our RECaST approach for transfer learning between linear models. We examine our method's performance in a simulation study and in an application to real hospital data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T19:39:47Z)
• Conformal prediction for the design problem [72.14982816083297]
  In many real-world deployments of machine learning, we use a prediction algorithm to choose what data to test next. In such settings, there is a distinct type of distribution shift between the training and test data. We introduce a method to quantify predictive uncertainty in such settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-08T02:59:12Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Spatial machine-learning model diagnostics: a model-agnostic distance-based approach [91.62936410696409]
  This contribution proposes spatial prediction error profiles (SPEPs) and spatial variable importance profiles (SVIPs) as novel model-agnostic assessment and interpretation tools. The SPEPs and SVIPs of geostatistical methods, linear models, random forest, and hybrid algorithms show striking differences and also relevant similarities. The novel diagnostic tools enrich the toolkit of spatial data science, and may improve ML model interpretation, selection, and design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-13T01:50:36Z)
• Scalable Marginal Likelihood Estimation for Model Selection in Deep Learning [78.83598532168256]
  Marginal-likelihood based model-selection is rarely used in deep learning due to estimation difficulties. Our work shows that marginal likelihoods can improve generalization and be useful when validation data is unavailable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T09:50:24Z)
• Estimating the Prediction Performance of Spatial Models via Spatial k-Fold Cross Validation [1.7205106391379026]
  In machine learning one often assumes the data are independent when evaluating model performance. spatial autocorrelation (SAC) causes the standard cross validation (CV) methods to produce optimistically biased prediction performance estimates. We propose a modified version of the CV method called spatial k-fold cross validation (SKCV) which provides a useful estimate for model prediction performance without optimistic bias due to SAC.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-28T19:55:18Z)
• TraDE: Transformers for Density Estimation [101.20137732920718]
  TraDE is a self-attention-based architecture for auto-regressive density estimation. We present a suite of tasks such as regression using generated samples, out-of-distribution detection, and robustness to noise in the training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T07:32:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.