Conceptual variables, quantum theory, and statistical inference theory

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.08683v1
• Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 08:08:55 GMT
• Title: Conceptual variables, quantum theory, and statistical inference theory
• Authors: Inge S. Helland
• Abstract summary: A different approach towards quantum theory is proposed in this paper. The basis is to be conceptual variables, physical variables that may be accessible or inaccessible, i.e., it may be possible or impossible to assign numerical values to them.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A different approach towards quantum theory is proposed in this paper. The basis is taken to be conceptual variables, physical variables that may be accessible or inaccessible, i.e., it may be possible or impossible to assign numerical values to them. In an epistemic process, the accessible variables are just ideal observations as observed by an actor or by some communicating actors. Group actions are defined on these variables, and using group representation theory this is the basis for developing the Hilbert space formalism here. Operators corresponding to accessible conceptual variables are derived as a result of the formalism, and in the discrete case it is argued that the possible physical values are the eigenvalues of these operators. The Born formula is derived under specific assumptions. The whole discussion here is a supplement to the author's book [1]. The interpretation of quantum states (or eigenvector spaces) implied by this approach is as focused questions to nature together with sharp answers to those questions. Resolutions if the identity are then connected to the questions themselves; these may be complementary in the sense defined by Bohr. This interpretation may be called a general epistemic interpretation of quantum theory. It is similar to Zwirn's recent Convival Solipsism, and also to QBism, and more generally, can be seen as a concrete implementation of Rovelli's Relational Quantum Mechanics. The focus in the present paper is, however, as much on foundation as on interpretation. But the simple consequences of an epistemic interpretation for some so called quantum paradoxes are discussed. Connections to statistical inference theory are discussed in a preliminary way, both through an example and through a brief discussion of quantum measurement theory.

Related papers

• What is "quantum" about quantum gravity? [0.0]
  We argue that if both the equivalence principle and quantum mechanics continue to survive experimental tests, that this favors epistemic'' interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T21:19:50Z)
• A new approach towards quantum foundation and some consequences [0.0]
  A general theory based upon 6 postulates is introduced. The basical notions are theoretical variables that are associated with an observer or with a group of communicating observers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T09:43:23Z)
• Connecting classical finite exchangeability to quantum theory [69.62715388742298]
  Exchangeability is a fundamental concept in probability theory and statistics. We show how a de Finetti-like representation theorem for finitely exchangeable sequences requires a mathematical representation which is formally equivalent to quantum theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T17:15:19Z)
• An alternative foundation of quantum theory [0.0]
  A new approach to quantum theory is proposed in this paper. The accessible variables are just ideal observations connected to an observer or to some communicating observers. It is shown here that the groups and transformations needed in this approach can be constructed explicitly in the case where the accessible variables are finite-dimensional.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T11:12:00Z)
• Is there a finite complete set of monotones in any quantum resource theory? [39.58317527488534]
  We show that there does not exist a finite set of resource monotones which completely determines all state transformations. We show that totally ordered theories allow for free transformations between all pure states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-05T18:28:36Z)
• Why we should interpret density matrices as moment matrices: the case of (in)distinguishable particles and the emergence of classical reality [69.62715388742298]
  We introduce a formulation of quantum theory (QT) as a general probabilistic theory but expressed via quasi-expectation operators (QEOs) We will show that QT for both distinguishable and indistinguishable particles can be formulated in this way. We will show that finitely exchangeable probabilities for a classical dice are as weird as QT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-08T14:47:39Z)
• Epistemological and ontological aspects of quantum theory [0.0]
  It is possible to find values of quantum variables by doing experiments or by making measurements. It is shown here that this new machinery may facilitate the discussion of when a specific quantum state can be given an ontological interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T12:34:42Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)
• Bohr meets Rovelli: a dispositionalist account of the quantum limits of knowledge [0.0]
  I argue that the no-go theorems reflect on a formal level those practical and experimental settings that are needed to come to know the properties of physical systems. I show that, as a consequence of a relationist and perspectival approach to quantum mechanics, the quantum state of the universe regarded as an isolated system cannot be known in principle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T22:45:09Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.