Bohr meets Rovelli: a dispositionalist account of the quantum limits of knowledge

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08626v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 22:45:09 GMT
• Title: Bohr meets Rovelli: a dispositionalist account of the quantum limits of knowledge
• Authors: Mauro Dorato
• Abstract summary: I argue that the no-go theorems reflect on a formal level those practical and experimental settings that are needed to come to know the properties of physical systems. I show that, as a consequence of a relationist and perspectival approach to quantum mechanics, the quantum state of the universe regarded as an isolated system cannot be known in principle.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: I begin by examining the question of the quantum limits of knowledge by briefly presenting the constraints of the theory that derive from its mathematical structure (in particular the no-go theorems formulated by von Neumann and Kochen and Specker). I then argue that these theorems reflect on a formal level those practical and experimental settings that are needed to come to know the properties of physical systems. In particular, I discuss some aspects of this relationist and contextualist conception of reality by comparing, in their apparent diversity, Bohr holistic and Rovelli relationist interpretation of the formalism, that deep down share a unifying metaphysics of dispositions and propensities. Both interpretations are based on the widely shared fact that quantum mechanics does not describe previously definite quantities. In the final part I show that, as a consequence of a relationist and perspectival approach to quantum mechanics, the quantum state of the universe regarded as an isolated system cannot be known in principle, so that the universe must be described from within by dividing it into two arbitrary parts. This is in fact the only way in which any two systems can exchange information by being physically correlated.

Related papers

• What is "quantum" about quantum gravity? [0.0]
  We argue that if both the equivalence principle and quantum mechanics continue to survive experimental tests, that this favors epistemic'' interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-13T21:19:50Z)
• The Measurement Problem Is a Feature, Not a Bug--Schematising the Observer and the Concept of an Open System on an Informational, or (Neo-)Bohrian, Approach [0.0]
  I argue that quantum mechanics represents what Bohr called a natural generalisation of the ordinary causal description'' I show how the quantum generalisation of the concept of an open system may be used to assuage Einstein's complaint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T00:19:04Z)
• Quantum state inference from coarse-grained descriptions: analysis and an application to quantum thermodynamics [101.18253437732933]
  We compare the Maximum Entropy Principle method, with the recently proposed Average Assignment Map method. Despite the fact that the assigned descriptions respect the measured constraints, the descriptions differ in scenarios that go beyond the traditional system-environment structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-16T19:42:24Z)
• Fact-nets: towards a mathematical framework for relational quantum mechanics [0.0]
  The relational interpretation of quantum mechanics (RQM) has received a growing interest since its first formulation in 1996. This paper proposes a radical reformulation of the mathematical framework of quantum mechanics which is relational from the start: fact-nets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-01T10:27:38Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Formalization of Bohr's contextuality within theory of open quantum systems [0.0]
  Bohr was the first who pointed to contextuality of quantum measurements. The original Bohr's contextuality, as contextuality of each quantum measurement, was practically forgotten. This note is applied to formalization of Bohr's contextuality within the the scheme of indirect measurements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-18T06:59:56Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)
• Preferred basis, decoherence and a quantum state of the Universe [77.34726150561087]
  We review a number of issues in foundations of quantum theory and quantum cosmology. These issues can be considered as a part of the scientific legacy of H.D. Zeh.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T18:07:59Z)
• Conceptual variables, quantum theory, and statistical inference theory [0.0]
  A different approach towards quantum theory is proposed in this paper. The basis is to be conceptual variables, physical variables that may be accessible or inaccessible, i.e., it may be possible or impossible to assign numerical values to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T08:08:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.