Epistemological and ontological aspects of quantum theory

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.10484v4
• Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 07:07:38 GMT
• Title: Epistemological and ontological aspects of quantum theory
• Authors: Inge S. Helland
• Abstract summary: It is possible to find values of quantum variables by doing experiments or by making measurements. It is shown here that this new machinery may facilitate the discussion of when a specific quantum state can be given an ontological interpretation.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, epistemology and ontology of quantum states are discussed based on a completely new way of founding quantum theory. The fundamental notions are conceptual variables in the mind of an observer or in the joint minds of a group of observers. These conceptual variables are very often accessible, that is, it is possible to find values of the variables by doing experiments or by making measurements. An important notion is that of maximal accessibility. It is shown here that this new machinery may facilitate the discussion of when a specific quantum state can be given an ontological interpretation, and also the more speculative question whether all states can be given such an interpretation. The discussion here is general, and has implications for the basic problem of how one should look upon information from experiments and measurement, in particularly the question concerning when this information may reflect properties of the real world.

Related papers

• Typical Quantum States of the Universe are Observationally Indistinguishable [0.0]
  We show that, if the universal quantum state can be assumed to be a typical unit vector from a high-dimensional subspace of Hilbert space, no observation can determine which vector it is. Our argument is based on a typicality from quantum statistical mechanics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T09:59:57Z)
• The Measurement Problem Is a Feature, Not a Bug--Schematising the Observer and the Concept of an Open System on an Informational, or (Neo-)Bohrian, Approach [0.0]
  I argue that quantum mechanics represents what Bohr called a natural generalisation of the ordinary causal description'' I show how the quantum generalisation of the concept of an open system may be used to assuage Einstein's complaint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T00:19:04Z)
• Quantum data learning for quantum simulations in high-energy physics [55.41644538483948]
  We explore the applicability of quantum-data learning to practical problems in high-energy physics. We make use of ansatz based on quantum convolutional neural networks and numerically show that it is capable of recognizing quantum phases of ground states. The observation of non-trivial learning properties demonstrated in these benchmarks will motivate further exploration of the quantum-data learning architecture in high-energy physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-29T18:00:01Z)
• The measurement problem in the light of the theory of decoherence [0.0]
  This paper proposes an exhaustive solution to the measurement problem in view of the theory of decoherence. Considering the latter as a probabilistic theory all along allows us to avoid the usual probability problem of the many-worlds interpretations. A thorough verification of the consistency of quantum mechanics at all scales is proposed, as well as a discussion of what can be deemed an observer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T19:47:52Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Quantum indistinguishability through exchangeable desirable gambles [69.62715388742298]
  Two particles are identical if all their intrinsic properties, such as spin and charge, are the same. Quantum mechanics is seen as a normative and algorithmic theory guiding an agent to assess her subjective beliefs represented as (coherent) sets of gambles. We show how sets of exchangeable observables (gambles) may be updated after a measurement and discuss the issue of defining entanglement for indistinguishable particle systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-10T13:11:59Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
  We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements. As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z)
• Conceptual variables, quantum theory, and statistical inference theory [0.0]
  A different approach towards quantum theory is proposed in this paper. The basis is to be conceptual variables, physical variables that may be accessible or inaccessible, i.e., it may be possible or impossible to assign numerical values to them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T08:08:55Z)
• Emergence of classical behavior in the early universe [68.8204255655161]
  Three notions are often assumed to be essentially equivalent, representing different facets of the same phenomenon. We analyze them in general Friedmann-Lemaitre- Robertson-Walker space-times through the lens of geometric structures on the classical phase space. The analysis shows that: (i) inflation does not play an essential role; classical behavior can emerge much more generally; (ii) the three notions are conceptually distinct; classicality can emerge in one sense but not in another.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-22T16:38:25Z)
• Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language [0.0]
  Review aims to reflect enough of the literature to be representative of the current state of the subject. Uses non-mathematical language precisely (terms defined) and rigorously (consistent meanings) A theory more descriptive of independent reality than is quantum mechanics may yet be possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-08T13:48:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.