Real or Not Real that is the question
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.08719v2
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 18:41:38 GMT
- Title: Real or Not Real that is the question
- Authors: Reinhold A. Bertlmann
- Abstract summary: Bell had a strong aversion against "quantum jumps" and insisted to be clear in phrasing quantum mechanics.
Bell-type experiments and what Nature responded, and discuss the implications for the physical quantities considered.
I would like to broaden and contrast the reality discussion with the concept of "virtuality", with the meaning of virtual particle occurring in quantum field theory.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: My discussions with John Bell about reality in quantum mechanics are
recollected. I would like to introduce the reader to Bell's vision of reality
which was for him a natural position for a scientist. Bell had a strong
aversion against "quantum jumps" and insisted to be clear in phrasing quantum
mechanics, his "words to be forbidden" proclaimed with seriousness and wit --
both typical Bell characteristics -- became legendary. I will summarize the
Bell-type experiments and what Nature responded, and discuss the implications
for the physical quantities considered, the real entities and the nonlocality
concept due to Bell's work. Subsequently, I also explain a quite different view
of the meaning of a quantum state, this is the information theoretic approach,
focussing on the work of Brukner and Zeilinger. Finally, I would like to
broaden and contrast the reality discussion with the concept of "virtuality",
with the meaning of virtual particle occurring in quantum field theory. With
some of my own thoughts I will conclude the paper which is composed more as a
historical article than as a philosophical one.
Related papers
- Primer on quantum weirdness [0.0]
We assume knowledge of basic quantum mechanics.
We explicate ideas as projectors, density operators, Bell inequalities, entanglement and the Lindblad equation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-13T18:06:02Z) - The Evolution of the Bell Notion of Beable: from Bohr to Primitive
Ontology [0.0]
John S. Bell introduced the notion of beable, as opposed to the standard notion of observable, in order to emphasize the need for an unambiguous formulation of quantum mechanics.
I show that Bell formulated in fact two different theories of beables. The first is somehow reminiscent of the Bohr views on quantum mechanics but, at the same time, is curiously adopted by Bell as a critical tool against the Copenhagen interpretation.
I consider how the distinction between the two formulations of the Bell theory of beables fares vis-a-vis the complex relationship between the theory of beables and the details of the Primitive Ontology
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T15:55:15Z) - Bell's theorem: A bridge between the measurement and the mind/body
problems [0.0]
This essay is a quantum-dualistic, perspectival and synchronistic interpretation of quantum mechanics.
It is termed the Nietzsche-Jung-Pauli interpretation and is a re-imagining of the Wigner-von Neumann interpretation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-13T12:16:07Z) - Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory.
We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z) - About the description of physical reality of Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
A hidden variables model complying with the simplest form of Local Realism was recently introduced.
It reproduces Quantum Mechanics' predictions for an even ideally perfect Bell's experiment.
A new type of quantum computer does not exist yet, not even in theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-06T15:55:13Z) - Bell nonlocality in networks [62.997667081978825]
Bell's theorem proves that quantum theory is inconsistent with local physical models.
In the last decade, the investigation of nonlocality has moved beyond Bell's theorem to consider more sophisticated experiments.
This review discusses the main concepts, methods, results and future challenges in the emerging topic of Bell nonlocality in networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-21T18:00:48Z) - The view from a Wigner bubble [0.0]
I argue that the key distinction between QBism and realist interpretations of quantum mechanics is best understood in terms of their adherence to different theories of truth.
The notion of reality afforded by QBism will correspond to the invariant elements of any theory that has pragmatic value to all rational agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-12T04:21:33Z) - Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity [48.7576911714538]
We show that quantum states are easier to create and manipulate if they only have real elements.
As an application, we show that imaginarity plays a crucial role for state discrimination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-29T14:03:38Z) - Non-Boolean Hidden Variables model reproduces Quantum Mechanics'
predictions for Bell's experiment [91.3755431537592]
Theory aimed to violate Bell's inequalities must start by giving up Boolean logic.
"Hard" problem is to predict the time values when single particles are detected.
"Soft" problem is to explain the violation of Bell's inequalities within (non-Boolean) Local Realism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-20T21:46:35Z) - Quantum postulate vs. quantum nonlocality: Is Devil in h? [0.0]
Bell's model with hidden variables is that it straightforwardly contradicts to the Heinsenberg's uncertainty and generally Bohr's complementarity principles.
Bell's approach with hidden variable straightforwardly implies rejection of the quantum postulate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-12T11:59:14Z) - Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality [91.3755431537592]
Bell's experiment description assumes the (Quantum Mechanics-language equivalent of the classical) condition of Locality.
This result is complementary to a recently published one demonstrating that non-Locality is necessary to describe said experiment.
It is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is absolutely no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-27T15:04:08Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.