The view from a Wigner bubble

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05100v2
• Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:24:13 GMT
• Title: The view from a Wigner bubble
• Authors: Eric G. Cavalcanti
• Abstract summary: I argue that the key distinction between QBism and realist interpretations of quantum mechanics is best understood in terms of their adherence to different theories of truth. The notion of reality afforded by QBism will correspond to the invariant elements of any theory that has pragmatic value to all rational agents.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In a recent no-go theorem [Bong et al, Nature Physics (2020)], we proved that the predictions of unitary quantum mechanics for an extended Wigner's friend scenario are incompatible with any theory satisfying three metaphysical assumptions, the conjunction of which we call "Local Friendliness": Absoluteness of Observed Events, Locality and No-Superdeterminism. In this paper (based on an invited talk for the QBism jubilee at the 2019 Vaxjo conference) I discuss the implications of this theorem for QBism, as seen from the perspective of experimental metaphysics. I argue that the key distinction between QBism and realist interpretations of quantum mechanics is best understood in terms of their adherence to different theories of truth: the pragmatist versus the correspondence theories. I argue that a productive pathway to resolve the measurement problem within a pragmatist view involves taking seriously the perspective of quantum betting agents, even those in what I call a "Wigner bubble". The notion of reality afforded by QBism, I propose, will correspond to the invariant elements of any theory that has pragmatic value to all rational agents -- that is, the elements that are invariant upon changes of agent perspectives. The classical notion of `event' is not among those invariants, even when those events are observed by some agent. Neither are quantum states. Nevertheless, I argue that far from solipsism, a personalist view of quantum states is an expression of its precise opposite: Copernicanism.

Related papers

• Quantum Probabilities Are Objective Degrees of Epistemic Justification [0.0]
  QBism is one of the most widely discussed'subjective' interpretations of quantum mechanics. This paper takes QBism as a starting point, but allows objectivity to enter from the get-go.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T22:07:34Z)
• Intuitionistic Quantum Logic Perspective: Static and Dynamic Revision Operators [6.646627444027416]
  We focus on the exploration of a revision theory grounded in quantum mechanics, referred to as the natural revision theory. We combine the advantages of two intuitionistic quantum logic frameworks, as proposed by D"oring and Coecke. We introduce two types of revision operators that correspond to the two reasoning modes in quantum systems: static and dynamic revision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-21T10:35:06Z)
• Thinking twice inside the box: is Wigner's friend really quantum? [0.0]
  We argue that the gist of the Wigner's friend paradox can be reproduced without assuming quantum physics. We show that several recently proposed extended Wigner's friend scenarios can be reproduced by classical thought experiments. We argue that this difficulty is at the core of other puzzles in the foundations of physics and philosophy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T19:00:13Z)
• Logic meets Wigner's Friend (and their Friends) [49.1574468325115]
  We take a fresh look at Wigner's Friend thought-experiment and some of its more recent variants and extensions. We discuss various solutions proposed in the literature, focusing on a few questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-04T13:31:56Z)
• Perspectival Quantum Realism [0.0]
  We argue that the problems identified by QBism and Quantum Pragmatism do not necessitate abandoning the ideal of representing the physical world. We can avail ourselves of the same puzzle-solving strategies as employed by QBists and pragmatists by adopting a emphperspectival quantum realism
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T16:23:54Z)
• Unobservable entities in QBism and phenomenology [0.0]
  We argue that QBism's "experiences" are synonymous with the concept of "perceived phenomena" in phenomenology. This suggests an approach to ontology in which objects can only be physically real if they are in principle observable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-28T21:42:04Z)
• Quantum realism: axiomatization and quantification [77.34726150561087]
  We build an axiomatization for quantum realism -- a notion of realism compatible with quantum theory. We explicitly construct some classes of entropic quantifiers that are shown to satisfy almost all of the proposed axioms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-10T18:08:42Z)
• Consistency in the description of quantum measurement: Quantum theory can consistently describe the use of itself [8.122270502556372]
  I propose a slight addition to standard textbook quantum mechanics, in the form of two rules, which avoids the paradox. The first specifies when a given quantum dynamics can be interpreted as a measurement. The second requires that a joint context be used to determine whether several different dynamical evolutions can all be interpreted as measurement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T18:00:15Z)
• Gentle Measurement as a Principle of Quantum Theory [9.137554315375919]
  We propose the gentle measurement principle (GMP) as one of the principles at the foundation of quantum mechanics. We show, within the framework of general probabilistic theories, that GMP imposes strong restrictions on the law of physics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-28T11:59:49Z)
• Observers of quantum systems cannot agree to disagree [55.41644538483948]
  We ask whether agreement between observers can serve as a physical principle that must hold for any theory of the world. We construct examples of (postquantum) no-signaling boxes where observers can agree to disagree.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T19:00:04Z)
• Quantum resource covariance [0.0]
  Since the dawn of quantum mechanics there is no consensus on what the theory is all about. We construct a theoretical framework within which a given combination of quantum resources is shown to be a Galilean invariant. We show that the notion of physical reality implied by quantum mechanics is not absolute.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-19T17:34:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.