Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.11904v2
• Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 01:57:11 GMT
• Title: Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing
• Authors: Shangxi Wu and Jitao Sang and Kaiyuan Xu and Guanhua Zheng and Changsheng Xu
• Abstract summary: An adversarial training solution Adversarial Logits Pairing (ALP) tends to rely on fewer high-contribution features compared with vulnerable ones. Motivated by these observations, we design an Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing (AALP) solution by modifying the training process and training target of ALP. AALP consists of an adaptive feature optimization module with Guided Dropout to systematically pursue fewer high-contribution features.
• Score: 65.51670200266913
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Adversarial examples provide an opportunity as well as impose a challenge for understanding image classification systems. Based on the analysis of the adversarial training solution Adversarial Logits Pairing (ALP), we observed in this work that: (1) The inference of adversarially robust model tends to rely on fewer high-contribution features compared with vulnerable ones. (2) The training target of ALP doesn't fit well to a noticeable part of samples, where the logits pairing loss is overemphasized and obstructs minimizing the classification loss. Motivated by these observations, we design an Adaptive Adversarial Logits Pairing (AALP) solution by modifying the training process and training target of ALP. Specifically, AALP consists of an adaptive feature optimization module with Guided Dropout to systematically pursue fewer high-contribution features, and an adaptive sample weighting module by setting sample-specific training weights to balance between logits pairing loss and classification loss. The proposed AALP solution demonstrates superior defense performance on multiple datasets with extensive experiments.

Related papers

• CLIP Adaptation by Intra-modal Overlap Reduction [1.2277343096128712]
  We analyse the intra-modal overlap in image space in terms of embedding representation. We train a lightweight adapter on a generic set of samples from the Google Open Images dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T16:40:58Z)
• Hybrid Classification-Regression Adaptive Loss for Dense Object Detection [19.180514552400883]
  We propose a Hybrid Classification-Regression Adaptive Loss, termed as HCRAL. We introduce the Residual of Classification and IoU (RCI) module for cross-task supervision, addressing task inconsistencies, and the Conditioning Factor (CF) to focus on difficult-to-train samples within each task. We also introduce a new strategy named Expanded Adaptive Training Sample Selection (EATSS) to provide additional samples that exhibit classification and regression inconsistencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-30T10:31:39Z)
• Rethinking Classifier Re-Training in Long-Tailed Recognition: A Simple Logits Retargeting Approach [102.0769560460338]
  We develop a simple logits approach (LORT) without the requirement of prior knowledge of the number of samples per class. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on various imbalanced datasets, including CIFAR100-LT, ImageNet-LT, and iNaturalist 2018.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T03:27:08Z)
• Balanced Classification: A Unified Framework for Long-Tailed Object Detection [74.94216414011326]
  Conventional detectors suffer from performance degradation when dealing with long-tailed data due to a classification bias towards the majority head categories. We introduce a unified framework called BAlanced CLassification (BACL), which enables adaptive rectification of inequalities caused by disparities in category distribution. BACL consistently achieves performance improvements across various datasets with different backbones and architectures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-04T09:11:07Z)
• Adaptive Meta-learner via Gradient Similarity for Few-shot Text Classification [11.035878821365149]
  We propose a novel Adaptive Meta-learner via Gradient Similarity (AMGS) to improve the model generalization ability to a new task. Experimental results on several benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed AMGS consistently improves few-shot text classification performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-10T16:14:53Z)
• Learning to Re-weight Examples with Optimal Transport for Imbalanced Classification [74.62203971625173]
  Imbalanced data pose challenges for deep learning based classification models. One of the most widely-used approaches for tackling imbalanced data is re-weighting. We propose a novel re-weighting method based on optimal transport (OT) from a distributional point of view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-05T01:23:54Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Fair Representations [50.95604482330149]
  Trained classification models can unintentionally lead to biased representations and predictions. Existing debiasing methods for classification models, such as adversarial training, are often expensive to train and difficult to optimise. We propose a method for mitigating bias by incorporating contrastive learning, in which instances sharing the same class label are encouraged to have similar representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T10:47:51Z)
• Two-stage Training for Learning from Label Proportions [18.78148397471913]
  Learning from label proportions (LLP) aims at learning an instance-level classifier with label proportions in grouped training data. We introduce the mixup strategy and symmetric crossentropy to further reduce the label noise. Our framework is model-agnostic, and demonstrates compelling performance improvement in extensive experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-22T03:55:35Z)
• Unleashing the Power of Contrastive Self-Supervised Visual Models via Contrast-Regularized Fine-Tuning [94.35586521144117]
  We investigate whether applying contrastive learning to fine-tuning would bring further benefits. We propose Contrast-regularized tuning (Core-tuning), a novel approach for fine-tuning contrastive self-supervised visual models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-12T16:31:24Z)
• ATRO: Adversarial Training with a Rejection Option [10.36668157679368]
  This paper proposes a classification framework with a rejection option to mitigate the performance deterioration caused by adversarial examples. Applying the adversarial training objective to both a classifier and a rejection function simultaneously, we can choose to abstain from classification when it has insufficient confidence to classify a test data point.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T14:05:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.