Distributional Robustness with IPMs and links to Regularization and GANs

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.04349v1
• Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 04:41:29 GMT
• Title: Distributional Robustness with IPMs and links to Regularization and GANs
• Authors: Hisham Husain
• Abstract summary: We study robustness via divergence-based uncertainty sets in machine learning. We extend our results to shed light on adversarial generative modelling via $f$-GANs.
• Score: 10.863536797169148
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Robustness to adversarial attacks is an important concern due to the fragility of deep neural networks to small perturbations and has received an abundance of attention in recent years. Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO), a particularly promising way of addressing this challenge, studies robustness via divergence-based uncertainty sets and has provided valuable insights into robustification strategies such as regularization. In the context of machine learning, the majority of existing results have chosen $f$-divergences, Wasserstein distances and more recently, the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) to construct uncertainty sets. We extend this line of work for the purposes of understanding robustness via regularization by studying uncertainty sets constructed with Integral Probability Metrics (IPMs) - a large family of divergences including the MMD, Total Variation and Wasserstein distances. Our main result shows that DRO under \textit{any} choice of IPM corresponds to a family of regularization penalties, which recover and improve upon existing results in the setting of MMD and Wasserstein distances. Due to the generality of our result, we show that other choices of IPMs correspond to other commonly used penalties in machine learning. Furthermore, we extend our results to shed light on adversarial generative modelling via $f$-GANs, constituting the first study of distributional robustness for the $f$-GAN objective. Our results unveil the inductive properties of the discriminator set with regards to robustness, allowing us to give positive comments for several penalty-based GAN methods such as Wasserstein-, MMD- and Sobolev-GANs. In summary, our results intimately link GANs to distributional robustness, extend previous results on DRO and contribute to our understanding of the link between regularization and robustness at large.

Related papers

• The Risk of Federated Learning to Skew Fine-Tuning Features and Underperform Out-of-Distribution Robustness [50.52507648690234]
  Federated learning has the risk of skewing fine-tuning features and compromising the robustness of the model. We introduce three robustness indicators and conduct experiments across diverse robust datasets. Our approach markedly enhances the robustness across diverse scenarios, encompassing various parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T09:18:51Z)
• On the Foundation of Distributionally Robust Reinforcement Learning [19.621038847810198]
  We contribute to the theoretical foundation of distributionally robust reinforcement learning (DRRL) This framework obliges the decision maker to choose an optimal policy under the worst-case distributional shift orchestrated by an adversary. Within this DRMDP framework, we investigate conditions for the existence or absence of the dynamic programming principle (DPP)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T15:02:23Z)
• Distributional Shift-Aware Off-Policy Interval Estimation: A Unified Error Quantification Framework [8.572441599469597]
  We study high-confidence off-policy evaluation in the context of infinite-horizon Markov decision processes. The objective is to establish a confidence interval (CI) for the target policy value using only offline data pre-collected from unknown behavior policies. We show that our algorithm is sample-efficient, error-robust, and provably convergent even in non-linear function approximation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-23T06:35:44Z)
• CARE: Certifiably Robust Learning with Reasoning via Variational Inference [26.210129662748862]
  We propose a certifiably robust learning with reasoning pipeline (CARE) CARE achieves significantly higher certified robustness compared with the state-of-the-art baselines. We additionally conducted different ablation studies to demonstrate the empirical robustness of CARE and the effectiveness of different knowledge integration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-12T07:15:52Z)
• Improving Adversarial Robustness via Mutual Information Estimation [144.33170440878519]
  Deep neural networks (DNNs) are found to be vulnerable to adversarial noise. In this paper, we investigate the dependence between outputs of the target model and input adversarial samples from the perspective of information theory. We propose to enhance the adversarial robustness by maximizing the natural MI and minimizing the adversarial MI during the training process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-25T13:45:11Z)
• Reinforcement Learning with a Terminator [80.34572413850186]
  We learn the parameters of the TerMDP and leverage the structure of the estimation problem to provide state-wise confidence bounds. We use these to construct a provably-efficient algorithm, which accounts for termination, and bound its regret.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-30T18:40:28Z)
• Robustness and Accuracy Could Be Reconcilable by (Proper) Definition [109.62614226793833]
  The trade-off between robustness and accuracy has been widely studied in the adversarial literature. We find that it may stem from the improperly defined robust error, which imposes an inductive bias of local invariance. By definition, SCORE facilitates the reconciliation between robustness and accuracy, while still handling the worst-case uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T10:36:09Z)
• Trustworthy Multimodal Regression with Mixture of Normal-inverse Gamma Distributions [91.63716984911278]
  We introduce a novel Mixture of Normal-Inverse Gamma distributions (MoNIG) algorithm, which efficiently estimates uncertainty in principle for adaptive integration of different modalities and produces a trustworthy regression result. Experimental results on both synthetic and different real-world data demonstrate the effectiveness and trustworthiness of our method on various multimodal regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-11T14:28:12Z)
• Residuals-based distributionally robust optimization with covariate information [0.0]
  We consider data-driven approaches that integrate a machine learning prediction model within distributionally robust optimization (DRO) Our framework is flexible in the sense that it can accommodate a variety of learning setups and DRO ambiguity sets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-02T11:21:34Z)
• Distributional Robustness and Regularization in Reinforcement Learning [62.23012916708608]
  We introduce a new regularizer for empirical value functions and show that it lower bounds the Wasserstein distributionally robust value function. It suggests using regularization as a practical tool for dealing with $textitexternal uncertainty$ in reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-05T19:56:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.