DFraud3- Multi-Component Fraud Detection freeof Cold-start
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.05718v2
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 16:11:40 GMT
- Title: DFraud3- Multi-Component Fraud Detection freeof Cold-start
- Authors: Saeedreza Shehnepoor, Roberto Togneri, Wei Liu, Mohammed Bennamoun
- Abstract summary: The Cold-start is a significant problem referring to the failure of a detection system to recognize the authenticity of a new user.
In this paper, we model a review system as a Heterogeneous InformationNetwork (HIN) which enables a unique representation to every component.
HIN with graph induction helps to address the camouflage issue (fraudsterswith genuine reviews) which has shown to be more severe when it is coupled with cold-start, i.e., new fraudsters with genuine first reviews.
- Score: 50.779498955162644
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Fraud review detection is a hot research topic inrecent years. The Cold-start
is a particularly new but significant problem referring to the failure of a
detection system to recognize the authenticity of a new user. State-of-the-art
solutions employ a translational knowledge graph embedding approach (TransE) to
model the interaction of the components of a review system. However, these
approaches suffer from the limitation of TransEin handling N-1 relations and
the narrow scope of a single classification task, i.e., detecting fraudsters
only. In this paper, we model a review system as a Heterogeneous
InformationNetwork (HIN) which enables a unique representation to every
component and performs graph inductive learning on the review data through
aggregating features of nearby nodes. HIN with graph induction helps to address
the camouflage issue (fraudsterswith genuine reviews) which has shown to be
more severe when it is coupled with cold-start, i.e., new fraudsters with
genuine first reviews. In this research, instead of focusing only on one
component, detecting either fraud reviews or fraud users (fraudsters), vector
representations are learnt for each component, enabling multi-component
classification. In other words, we are able to detect fraud reviews,
fraudsters, and fraud-targeted items, thus the name of our approach DFraud3.
DFraud3 demonstrates a significant accuracy increase of 13% over the state of
the art on Yelp.
Related papers
- What If the Input is Expanded in OOD Detection? [77.37433624869857]
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection aims to identify OOD inputs from unknown classes.
Various scoring functions are proposed to distinguish it from in-distribution (ID) data.
We introduce a novel perspective, i.e., employing different common corruptions on the input space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T06:47:28Z) - Transaction Fraud Detection via an Adaptive Graph Neural Network [64.9428588496749]
We propose an Adaptive Sampling and Aggregation-based Graph Neural Network (ASA-GNN) that learns discriminative representations to improve the performance of transaction fraud detection.
A neighbor sampling strategy is performed to filter noisy nodes and supplement information for fraudulent nodes.
Experiments on three real financial datasets demonstrate that the proposed method ASA-GNN outperforms state-of-the-art ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-11T07:48:39Z) - On some studies of Fraud Detection Pipeline and related issues from the
scope of Ensemble Learning and Graph-based Learning [0.5820960526832067]
The UK anti-fraud charity Fraud Advisory Panel estimates business costs of fraud at 144 billion.
Building an efficient fraud detection system is challenging due to many difficult problems, e.g.imbalanced data, computing costs, etc.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-10T02:13:58Z) - Social Fraud Detection Review: Methods, Challenges and Analysis [42.30892608083864]
Social reviews have dominated the web and become a plausible source of product information.
Business make use of social information to spread fake information using a single user, groups of users, or a bot trained to generate fraudulent content.
Many studies proposed approaches based on user behaviors and review text to address the challenges of fraud detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-10T11:25:20Z) - Deep Fraud Detection on Non-attributed Graph [61.636677596161235]
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown solid performance on fraud detection.
labeled data is scarce in large-scale industrial problems, especially for fraud detection.
We propose a novel graph pre-training strategy to leverage more unlabeled data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-04T03:42:09Z) - Locally Interpretable One-Class Anomaly Detection for Credit Card Fraud
Detection [4.507860128918788]
We propose a novel anomaly detection framework for credit card fraud detection.
The fraud detection model is composed of two deep neural networks, which are trained in an unsupervised and adversarial manner.
The explanation module has three white-box explainers in charge of interpretations of the AutoEncoder, discriminator, and the whole detection model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-05T10:19:12Z) - Relational Graph Neural Networks for Fraud Detection in a Super-App
environment [53.561797148529664]
We propose a framework of relational graph convolutional networks methods for fraudulent behaviour prevention in the financial services of a Super-App.
We use an interpretability algorithm for graph neural networks to determine the most important relations to the classification task of the users.
Our results show that there is an added value when considering models that take advantage of the alternative data of the Super-App and the interactions found in their high connectivity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-29T00:02:06Z) - ScoreGAN: A Fraud Review Detector based on Multi Task Learning of
Regulated GAN with Data Augmentation [50.779498955162644]
We propose ScoreGAN for fraud review detection that makes use of both review text and review rating scores in the generation and detection process.
Results show that the proposed framework outperformed the existing state-of-the-art framework, namely FakeGAN, in terms of AP by 7%, and 5% on the Yelp and TripAdvisor datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-11T16:15:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.