Query Training: Learning a Worse Model to Infer Better Marginals in Undirected Graphical Models with Hidden Variables

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.06803v4
• Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 00:44:54 GMT
• Title: Query Training: Learning a Worse Model to Infer Better Marginals in Undirected Graphical Models with Hidden Variables
• Authors: Miguel L\'azaro-Gredilla, Wolfgang Lehrach, Nishad Gothoskar, Guangyao Zhou, Antoine Dedieu, Dileep George
• Abstract summary: Probabilistic graphical models (PGMs) provide a compact representation of knowledge that can be queried in a flexible way. We introduce query training (QT), a mechanism to learn a PGM that is optimized for the approximate inference algorithm that will be paired with it. We demonstrate experimentally that QT can be used to learn a challenging 8-connected grid Markov random field with hidden variables.
• Score: 11.985433487639403
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Probabilistic graphical models (PGMs) provide a compact representation of knowledge that can be queried in a flexible way: after learning the parameters of a graphical model once, new probabilistic queries can be answered at test time without retraining. However, when using undirected PGMS with hidden variables, two sources of error typically compound in all but the simplest models (a) learning error (both computing the partition function and integrating out the hidden variables is intractable); and (b) prediction error (exact inference is also intractable). Here we introduce query training (QT), a mechanism to learn a PGM that is optimized for the approximate inference algorithm that will be paired with it. The resulting PGM is a worse model of the data (as measured by the likelihood), but it is tuned to produce better marginals for a given inference algorithm. Unlike prior works, our approach preserves the querying flexibility of the original PGM: at test time, we can estimate the marginal of any variable given any partial evidence. We demonstrate experimentally that QT can be used to learn a challenging 8-connected grid Markov random field with hidden variables and that it consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art AdVIL when tested on three undirected models across multiple datasets.

Related papers

• Single-Stage Visual Relationship Learning using Conditional Queries [60.90880759475021]
  TraCQ is a new formulation for scene graph generation that avoids the multi-task learning problem and the entity pair distribution. We employ a DETR-based encoder-decoder conditional queries to significantly reduce the entity label space as well. Experimental results show that TraCQ not only outperforms existing single-stage scene graph generation methods, it also beats many state-of-the-art two-stage methods on the Visual Genome dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T06:02:01Z)
• Gaussian Process Probes (GPP) for Uncertainty-Aware Probing [61.91898698128994]
  We introduce a unified and simple framework for probing and measuring uncertainty about concepts represented by models. Our experiments show it can (1) probe a model's representations of concepts even with a very small number of examples, (2) accurately measure both epistemic uncertainty (how confident the probe is) and aleatory uncertainty (how fuzzy the concepts are to the model), and (3) detect out of distribution data using those uncertainty measures as well as classic methods do.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T17:00:16Z)
• Learning from aggregated data with a maximum entropy model [73.63512438583375]
  We show how a new model, similar to a logistic regression, may be learned from aggregated data only by approximating the unobserved feature distribution with a maximum entropy hypothesis. We present empirical evidence on several public datasets that the model learned this way can achieve performances comparable to those of a logistic model trained with the full unaggregated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-05T09:17:27Z)
• uGLAD: Sparse graph recovery by optimizing deep unrolled networks [11.48281545083889]
  We present a novel technique to perform sparse graph recovery by optimizing deep unrolled networks. Our model, uGLAD, builds upon and extends the state-of-the-art model GLAD to the unsupervised setting. We evaluate model results on synthetic Gaussian data, non-Gaussian data generated from Gene Regulatory Networks, and present a case study in anaerobic digestion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T20:20:27Z)
• Generalised Gaussian Process Latent Variable Models (GPLVM) with Stochastic Variational Inference [9.468270453795409]
  We study the doubly formulation of the BayesianVM model amenable with minibatch training. We show how this framework is compatible with different latent variable formulations and perform experiments to compare a suite of models. We demonstrate how we can train in the presence of massively missing data and obtain high-fidelity reconstructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T21:21:51Z)
• Masked prediction tasks: a parameter identifiability view [49.533046139235466]
  We focus on the widely used self-supervised learning method of predicting masked tokens. We show that there is a rich landscape of possibilities, out of which some prediction tasks yield identifiability, while others do not.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T17:09:32Z)
• Model-based micro-data reinforcement learning: what are the crucial model properties and which model to choose? [0.2836066255205732]
  We contribute to micro-data model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) by rigorously comparing popular generative models. We find that on an environment that requires multimodal posterior predictives, mixture density nets outperform all other models by a large margin. We also found that deterministic models are on par, in fact they consistently (although non-significantly) outperform their probabilistic counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-24T11:38:25Z)
• How Can We Know When Language Models Know? On the Calibration of Language Models for Question Answering [80.82194311274694]
  We examine the question "how can we know when language models know, with confidence, the answer to a particular query?" We examine three strong generative models -- T5, BART, and GPT-2 -- and study whether their probabilities on QA tasks are well calibrated. We then examine methods to calibrate such models to make their confidence scores correlate better with the likelihood of correctness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-02T03:53:13Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
• Characterizing and Avoiding Problematic Global Optima of Variational Autoencoders [28.36260646471421]
  Variational Auto-encoders (VAEs) are deep generative latent variable models. Recent work shows that traditional training methods tend to yield solutions that violate desiderata. We show that both issues stem from the fact that the global optima of the VAE training objective often correspond to undesirable solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-17T15:14:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.