Fair Influence Maximization: A Welfare Optimization Approach
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.07906v2
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 21:39:06 GMT
- Title: Fair Influence Maximization: A Welfare Optimization Approach
- Authors: Aida Rahmattalabi, Shahin Jabbari, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Phebe Vayanos,
Max Izenberg, Ryan Brown, Eric Rice, Milind Tambe
- Abstract summary: We provide a principled characterization of the properties that a fair influence algorithm should satisfy.
Under this framework, the trade-off between fairness and efficiency can be controlled by a single design aversion parameter.
Our framework encompasses as special cases leximin and proportional fairness.
- Score: 34.39574750992602
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Several behavioral, social, and public health interventions, such as
suicide/HIV prevention or community preparedness against natural disasters,
leverage social network information to maximize outreach. Algorithmic influence
maximization techniques have been proposed to aid with the choice of "peer
leaders" or "influencers" in such interventions. Yet, traditional algorithms
for influence maximization have not been designed with these interventions in
mind. As a result, they may disproportionately exclude minority communities
from the benefits of the intervention. This has motivated research on fair
influence maximization. Existing techniques come with two major drawbacks.
First, they require committing to a single fairness measure. Second, these
measures are typically imposed as strict constraints leading to undesirable
properties such as wastage of resources.
To address these shortcomings, we provide a principled characterization of
the properties that a fair influence maximization algorithm should satisfy. In
particular, we propose a framework based on social welfare theory, wherein the
cardinal utilities derived by each community are aggregated using the
isoelastic social welfare functions. Under this framework, the trade-off
between fairness and efficiency can be controlled by a single inequality
aversion design parameter. We then show under what circumstances our proposed
principles can be satisfied by a welfare function. The resulting optimization
problem is monotone and submodular and can be solved efficiently with
optimality guarantees. Our framework encompasses as special cases leximin and
proportional fairness. Extensive experiments on synthetic and real world
datasets including a case study on landslide risk management demonstrate the
efficacy of the proposed framework.
Related papers
- Learning to Mitigate Externalities: the Coase Theorem with Hindsight Rationality [62.18973784316808]
In economic theory, the concept of externality refers to any indirect effect resulting from an interaction between players that affects the social welfare.
Our work removes the classical assumption that bargainers possess perfect knowledge of the underlying game.
We then design a policy for the players which allows them to learn a bargaining strategy which maximizes the total welfare.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-28T11:00:53Z) - Structural Interventions and the Dynamics of Inequality [0.0]
We show that technical solutions must be paired with external, context-aware interventions to enact social change.
This research highlights the ways that structural inequality can be perpetuated by seemingly unbiased decision mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-03T13:44:38Z) - Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Offs: A Causal Perspective [58.06306331390586]
We analyze the tension between fairness and accuracy from a causal lens for the first time.
We show that enforcing a causal constraint often reduces the disparity between demographic groups.
We introduce a new neural approach for causally-constrained fair learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-24T11:19:52Z) - Reduced-Rank Multi-objective Policy Learning and Optimization [57.978477569678844]
In practice, causal researchers do not have a single outcome in mind a priori.
In government-assisted social benefit programs, policymakers collect many outcomes to understand the multidimensional nature of poverty.
We present a data-driven dimensionality-reduction methodology for multiple outcomes in the context of optimal policy learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-29T08:16:30Z) - Domain Generalization without Excess Empirical Risk [83.26052467843725]
A common approach is designing a data-driven surrogate penalty to capture generalization and minimize the empirical risk jointly with the penalty.
We argue that a significant failure mode of this recipe is an excess risk due to an erroneous penalty or hardness in joint optimization.
We present an approach that eliminates this problem. Instead of jointly minimizing empirical risk with the penalty, we minimize the penalty under the constraint of optimality of the empirical risk.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-30T08:46:46Z) - Rebalancing Social Feed to Minimize Polarization and Disagreement [24.939887831898453]
We propose a novel problem formulation aimed at slightly nudging users' social feeds in order to strike a balance between relevance and diversity.
Our approach is based on re-weighting the relative importance of the accounts that a user follows, so as to calibrate the frequency with which the content produced by various accounts is shown to the user.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-28T10:59:05Z) - Causal Fairness for Outcome Control [68.12191782657437]
We study a specific decision-making task called outcome control in which an automated system aims to optimize an outcome variable $Y$ while being fair and equitable.
In this paper, we first analyze through causal lenses the notion of benefit, which captures how much a specific individual would benefit from a positive decision.
We then note that the benefit itself may be influenced by the protected attribute, and propose causal tools which can be used to analyze this.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-08T09:31:18Z) - Towards a Fairness-Aware Scoring System for Algorithmic Decision-Making [35.21763166288736]
We propose a general framework to create data-driven fairness-aware scoring systems.
We show that the proposed framework provides practitioners or policymakers great flexibility to select their desired fairness requirements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-21T09:46:35Z) - Balancing Fairness and Efficiency in an Optimization Model [0.0]
A trade-off between fairness and efficiency is an important element of many practical decisions.
We propose a principled and practical method for balancing these two criteria in an optimization model.
We demonstrate the method on problems of realistic size involving healthcare resource allocation and disaster preparation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-10T17:24:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.