COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance in the US and UK in the Early Phase of the
Pandemic: AI-Generated Vaccines Hesitancy for Minors, and the Role of
Governments
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.08164v3
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:10:17 GMT
- Title: COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance in the US and UK in the Early Phase of the
Pandemic: AI-Generated Vaccines Hesitancy for Minors, and the Role of
Governments
- Authors: Gabriel Lima, Meeyoung Cha, Chiyoung Cha, Hyeyoung Hwang
- Abstract summary: The use of artificial intelligence in vaccine development did not influence vaccine acceptance.
Vignettes that explicitly stated the high effectiveness of vaccines led to an increase in vaccine acceptance.
- Score: 10.64167691614925
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This study presents survey results of the public's willingness to get
vaccinated against COVID-19 during an early phase of the pandemic and examines
factors that could influence vaccine acceptance based on a between-subjects
design. A representative quota sample of 572 adults in the US and UK
participated in an online survey. First, the participants' medical use
tendencies and initial vaccine acceptance were assessed; then, short vignettes
were provided to evaluate their changes in attitude towards COVID-19 vaccines.
For data analysis, ANOVA and post hoc pairwise comparisons were used. The
participants were more reluctant to vaccinate their children than themselves
and the elderly. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in vaccine development
did not influence vaccine acceptance. Vignettes that explicitly stated the high
effectiveness of vaccines led to an increase in vaccine acceptance. Our study
suggests public policies emphasizing the vaccine effectiveness against the
virus could lead to higher vaccination rates. We also discuss the public's
expectations of governments concerning vaccine safety and present a series of
implications based on our findings.
Related papers
- Accurate Measures of Vaccination and Concerns of Vaccine Holdouts from
Web Search Logs [31.231365080959247]
We show how large-scale search engine logs and machine learning can be leveraged to fill gaps in vaccine data.
We develop a vaccine intent classifier that can accurately detect when a user is seeking the COVID-19 vaccine on search.
We use our classifier to identify two groups, vaccine early adopters and vaccine holdouts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-12T23:19:55Z) - VaxxHesitancy: A Dataset for Studying Hesitancy towards COVID-19
Vaccination on Twitter [6.061534265076204]
We create a new collection of over 3,101 tweets annotated with users' attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination (stance)
To the best of our knowledge, these are the first dataset and model that model vaccine hesitancy as a category distinct from pro- and anti-vaccine stance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-17T02:00:31Z) - Dense Feature Memory Augmented Transformers for COVID-19 Vaccination
Search Classification [60.49594822215981]
This paper presents a classification model for detecting COVID-19 vaccination related search queries.
We propose a novel approach of considering dense features as memory tokens that the model can attend to.
We show that this new modeling approach enables a significant improvement to the Vaccine Search Insights (VSI) task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-16T13:57:41Z) - Doctors vs. Nurses: Understanding the Great Divide in Vaccine Hesitancy
among Healthcare Workers [64.1526243118151]
We find that doctors are overall more positive toward the COVID-19 vaccines.
Doctors are more concerned with the effectiveness of the vaccines over newer variants.
Nurses pay more attention to the potential side effects on children.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-11T14:22:16Z) - A Multilingual Dataset of COVID-19 Vaccination Attitudes on Twitter [4.696697601424039]
We describe the collection and release of a dataset of tweets related to COVID-19 vaccines.
This dataset consists of the IDs of 2,198,090 tweets collected from Western Europe, 17,934 of which are annotated with the originators' vaccination stances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-27T13:44:48Z) - "COVID-19 was a FIFA conspiracy #curropt": An Investigation into the
Viral Spread of COVID-19 Misinformation [60.268682953952506]
We estimate the extent to which misinformation has influenced the course of the COVID-19 pandemic using natural language processing models.
We provide a strategy to combat social media posts that are likely to cause widespread harm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-12T19:41:01Z) - Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling for COVID-19 Vaccine Discussions [10.194753795363667]
We conduct an in-depth analysis of tweets related to the coronavirus vaccine on Twitter.
Results show that a majority of people are confident in the effectiveness of vaccines and are willing to get vaccinated.
Negative tweets are often associated with the complaints of vaccine shortages, side effects after injections and possible death after being vaccinated.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-08T23:30:17Z) - Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine and Its Determinants in Bangladesh [0.9449650062296822]
The research reported a high prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine refusal and hesitancy in Bangladesh.
To diminish the vaccine hesitancy and increase the uptake, the policymakers need to design a well-researched immunization strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-28T19:37:47Z) - The illicit trade of COVID-19 vaccines on the dark web [55.45786602961871]
Early analyses revealed that dark web marketplaces (DWMs) started offering COVID-19 related products (e.g., masks and COVID-19 tests) as soon as the COVID-19 pandemic started.
Here, we broaden the scope and depth of previous investigations by analysing 194 DWMs until July 2021, including the crucial period in which vaccines became available.
We show that recreational drugs are the most affected among traditional DWMs product, with COVID-19 mentions steadily increasing since March 2020.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-10T14:52:54Z) - Falling into the Echo Chamber: the Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter [65.7192861893042]
We examine the extent to which the vaccination debate on Twitter is conductive to potential outreach to the vaccination hesitant.
We discover that the vaccination skeptics, as well as the advocates, reside in their own distinct "echo chambers"
At the center of these echo chambers we find the ardent supporters, for which we build highly accurate network- and content-based classifiers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-26T13:55:50Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.