Comparative Sentiment Analysis of App Reviews

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.09739v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:28:07 GMT
• Title: Comparative Sentiment Analysis of App Reviews
• Authors: Sakshi Ranjan, Subhankar Mishra
• Abstract summary: This study aims to perform the sentiment classification of the app reviews and identify the university students' behavior towards the app market. We applied machine learning algorithms using the TF-IDF text representation scheme and the performance was evaluated on the ensemble learning method.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Google app market captures the school of thought of users via ratings and text reviews. The critique's viewpoint regarding an app is proportional to their satisfaction level. Consequently, this helps other users to gain insights before downloading or purchasing the apps. The potential information from the reviews can't be extracted manually, due to its exponential growth. Sentiment analysis, by machine learning algorithms employing NLP, is used to explicitly uncover and interpret the emotions. This study aims to perform the sentiment classification of the app reviews and identify the university students' behavior towards the app market. We applied machine learning algorithms using the TF-IDF text representation scheme and the performance was evaluated on the ensemble learning method. Our model was trained on Google reviews and tested on students' reviews. SVM recorded the maximum accuracy(93.37\%), F-score(0.88) on tri-gram + TF-IDF scheme. Bagging enhanced the performance of LR and NB with accuracy of 87.80\% and 85.5\% respectively.

Related papers

• LazyReview A Dataset for Uncovering Lazy Thinking in NLP Peer Reviews [74.87393214734114]
  This work introduces LazyReview, a dataset of peer-review sentences annotated with fine-grained lazy thinking categories. Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to detect these instances in a zero-shot setting. instruction-based fine-tuning on our dataset significantly boosts performance by 10-20 performance points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T10:07:33Z)
• Transforming Student Evaluation with Adaptive Intelligence and Performance Analytics [0.0]
  This paper creates a system for the evaluation of students performance using Artificial intelligence. There are formats of questions in the system which comprises multiple choice, short answers and descriptive questions. The platform has intelligent learning progressions where the user will be able to monitor his/her performances to be recommended a certain level of performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T18:57:51Z)
• A Benchmark for Fairness-Aware Graph Learning [58.515305543487386]
  We present an extensive benchmark on ten representative fairness-aware graph learning methods. Our in-depth analysis reveals key insights into the strengths and limitations of existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T18:43:43Z)
• Cobra Effect in Reference-Free Image Captioning Metrics [58.438648377314436]
  A proliferation of reference-free methods, leveraging visual-language pre-trained models (VLMs), has emerged. In this paper, we study if there are any deficiencies in reference-free metrics. We employ GPT-4V as an evaluative tool to assess generated sentences and the result reveals that our approach achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T12:36:23Z)
• Fairness Concerns in App Reviews: A Study on AI-based Mobile Apps [9.948068408730654]
  This research aims to investigate fairness concerns raised in mobile app reviews. Our research focuses on AI-based mobile app reviews as the chance of unfair behaviors and outcomes in AI-based apps may be higher than in non-AI-based apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T03:43:33Z)
• Perceiving University Student's Opinions from Google App Reviews [0.0]
  This study performs the sentiment classification of the app reviews and identifies the university student's behavior towards the app market via exploratory analysis. We applied machine learning algorithms using the TP, TF, and TF IDF text representation scheme and evaluated its performance on Bagging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-10T12:34:30Z)
• Deep Learning for Opinion Mining and Topic Classification of Course Reviews [0.0]
  We collected and pre-processed a large number of course reviews publicly available online. We applied machine learning techniques with the goal to gain insight into student sentiments and topics. For sentiment polarity, the top model was RoBERTa with 95.5% accuracy and 84.7% F1-macro, while for topic classification, an SVM was the top with 79.8% accuracy and 80.6% F1-macro.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T21:48:29Z)
• Proactive Prioritization of App Issues via Contrastive Learning [2.6763498831034043]
  We propose a new framework, PPrior, that enables proactive prioritization of app issues through identifying prominent reviews. PPrior employs a pre-trained T5 model and works in three phases. Phase one adapts the pre-trained T5 model to the user reviews data in a self-supervised fashion. Phase two, we leverage contrastive training to learn a generic and task-independent representation of user reviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-12T06:23:10Z)
• Giving Feedback on Interactive Student Programs with Meta-Exploration [74.5597783609281]
  Developing interactive software, such as websites or games, is a particularly engaging way to learn computer science. Standard approaches require instructors to manually grade student-implemented interactive programs. Online platforms that serve millions, like Code.org, are unable to provide any feedback on assignments for implementing interactive programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T10:00:23Z)
• SIFN: A Sentiment-aware Interactive Fusion Network for Review-based Item Recommendation [48.1799451277808]
  We propose a Sentiment-aware Interactive Fusion Network (SIFN) for review-based item recommendation. We first encode user/item reviews via BERT and propose a light-weighted sentiment learner to extract semantic features of each review. Then, we propose a sentiment prediction task that guides the sentiment learner to extract sentiment-aware features via explicit sentiment labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-18T08:04:38Z)
• Get It Scored Using AutoSAS -- An Automated System for Scoring Short Answers [63.835172924290326]
  We present a fast, scalable, and accurate approach towards automated Short Answer Scoring (SAS) We propose and explain the design and development of a system for SAS, namely AutoSAS. AutoSAS shows state-of-the-art performance and achieves better results by over 8% in some of the question prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T10:47:30Z)
• Emerging App Issue Identification via Online Joint Sentiment-Topic Tracing [66.57888248681303]
  We propose a novel emerging issue detection approach named MERIT. Based on the AOBST model, we infer the topics negatively reflected in user reviews for one app version. Experiments on popular apps from Google Play and Apple's App Store demonstrate the effectiveness of MERIT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-23T06:34:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.