Perceiving University Student's Opinions from Google App Reviews

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06705v1
• Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 12:34:30 GMT
• Title: Perceiving University Student's Opinions from Google App Reviews
• Authors: Sakshi Ranjan, Subhankar Mishra
• Abstract summary: This study performs the sentiment classification of the app reviews and identifies the university student's behavior towards the app market via exploratory analysis. We applied machine learning algorithms using the TP, TF, and TF IDF text representation scheme and evaluated its performance on Bagging.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Google app market captures the school of thought of users from every corner of the globe via ratings and text reviews, in a multilinguistic arena. The potential information from the reviews cannot be extracted manually, due to its exponential growth. So, Sentiment analysis, by machine learning and deep learning algorithms employing NLP, explicitly uncovers and interprets the emotions. This study performs the sentiment classification of the app reviews and identifies the university student's behavior towards the app market via exploratory analysis. We applied machine learning algorithms using the TP, TF, and TF IDF text representation scheme and evaluated its performance on Bagging, an ensemble learning method. We used word embedding, Glove, on the deep learning paradigms. Our model was trained on Google app reviews and tested on Student's App Reviews(SAR). The various combinations of these algorithms were compared amongst each other using F score and accuracy and inferences were highlighted graphically. SVM, amongst other classifiers, gave fruitful accuracy(93.41%), F score(89%) on bigram and TF IDF scheme. Bagging enhanced the performance of LR and NB with accuracy of 87.88% and 86.69% and F score of 86% and 78% respectively. Overall, LSTM on Glove embedding recorded the highest accuracy(95.2%) and F score(88%).

Related papers

• BN-AuthProf: Benchmarking Machine Learning for Bangla Author Profiling on Social Media Texts [0.0]
  This paper aims to extract valuable insights about anonymous authors based on their writing style on social media. The dataset comprises 30,131 social media posts from 300 authors, labeled by their age and gender. Various classical machine learning and deep learning techniques were employed to evaluate the dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-03T00:32:32Z)
• A Large-Scale Study of Relevance Assessments with Large Language Models: An Initial Look [52.114284476700874]
  This paper reports on the results of a large-scale evaluation (the TREC 2024 RAG Track) where four different relevance assessment approaches were deployed. We find that automatically generated UMBRELA judgments can replace fully manual judgments to accurately capture run-level effectiveness. Surprisingly, we find that LLM assistance does not appear to increase correlation with fully manual assessments, suggesting that costs associated with human-in-the-loop processes do not bring obvious tangible benefits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T01:12:35Z)
• Learning to Love Edge Cases in Formative Math Assessment: Using the AMMORE Dataset and Chain-of-Thought Prompting to Improve Grading Accuracy [0.0]
  This paper introduces AMMORE, a new dataset of 53,000 math open-response question-answer pairs from Rori. We conduct two experiments to evaluate the use of large language models (LLM) for grading challenging student answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T14:51:40Z)
• A Benchmark for Fairness-Aware Graph Learning [58.515305543487386]
  We present an extensive benchmark on ten representative fairness-aware graph learning methods. Our in-depth analysis reveals key insights into the strengths and limitations of existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T18:43:43Z)
• Comparative Analysis of Libraries for the Sentimental Analysis [0.0]
  This study is main goal is to provide a comparative comparison of libraries using machine learning methods. Five Python and R libraries NLTK, Textlob Vader, Transformers (GPT and BERT pretrained), and Tidytext will be used in the study to apply sentiment analysis techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T17:21:53Z)
• HomE: Homography-Equivariant Video Representation Learning [62.89516761473129]
  We propose a novel method for representation learning of multi-view videos. Our method learns an implicit mapping between different views, culminating in a representation space that maintains the homography relationship between neighboring views. On action classification, our method obtains 96.4% 3-fold accuracy on the UCF101 dataset, better than most state-of-the-art self-supervised learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T15:37:43Z)
• Deep Learning for Opinion Mining and Topic Classification of Course Reviews [0.0]
  We collected and pre-processed a large number of course reviews publicly available online. We applied machine learning techniques with the goal to gain insight into student sentiments and topics. For sentiment polarity, the top model was RoBERTa with 95.5% accuracy and 84.7% F1-macro, while for topic classification, an SVM was the top with 79.8% accuracy and 80.6% F1-macro.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-06T21:48:29Z)
• Can Active Learning Preemptively Mitigate Fairness Issues? [66.84854430781097]
  dataset bias is one of the prevailing causes of unfairness in machine learning. We study whether models trained with uncertainty-based ALs are fairer in their decisions with respect to a protected class. We also explore the interaction of algorithmic fairness methods such as gradient reversal (GRAD) and BALD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T14:20:22Z)
• Get It Scored Using AutoSAS -- An Automated System for Scoring Short Answers [63.835172924290326]
  We present a fast, scalable, and accurate approach towards automated Short Answer Scoring (SAS) We propose and explain the design and development of a system for SAS, namely AutoSAS. AutoSAS shows state-of-the-art performance and achieves better results by over 8% in some of the question prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T10:47:30Z)
• Deep F-measure Maximization for End-to-End Speech Understanding [52.36496114728355]
  We propose a differentiable approximation to the F-measure and train the network with this objective using standard backpropagation. We perform experiments on two standard fairness datasets, Adult, Communities and Crime, and also on speech-to-intent detection on the ATIS dataset and speech-to-image concept classification on the Speech-COCO dataset. In all four of these tasks, F-measure results in improved micro-F1 scores, with absolute improvements of up to 8% absolute, as compared to models trained with the cross-entropy loss function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-08T03:02:27Z)
• Voice@SRIB at SemEval-2020 Task 9 and 12: Stacked Ensembling method for Sentiment and Offensiveness detection in Social Media [2.9008108937701333]
  We train embeddings, ensembling methods for Sentimix, and OffensEval tasks. We evaluate our models on macro F1-score, precision, accuracy, and recall on the datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-20T11:54:43Z)
• Comparative Sentiment Analysis of App Reviews [0.0]
  This study aims to perform the sentiment classification of the app reviews and identify the university students' behavior towards the app market. We applied machine learning algorithms using the TF-IDF text representation scheme and the performance was evaluated on the ensemble learning method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T09:28:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.