Estimation of Causal Effects in the Presence of Unobserved Confounding in the Alzheimer's Continuum

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.13135v4
• Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 08:42:25 GMT
• Title: Estimation of Causal Effects in the Presence of Unobserved Confounding in the Alzheimer's Continuum
• Authors: Sebastian P\"olsterl, Christian Wachinger
• Abstract summary: We derive a causal graph from the current clinical knowledge on cause and effect in the Alzheimer's disease continuum. We show that identifiability of the causal effect requires all confounders to be known and measured. In our theoretical analysis, we prove that using the substitute confounder enables identifiability of the causal effect of neuroanatomy on cognition.
• Score: 3.2489082010225494
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Studying the relationship between neuroanatomy and cognitive decline due to Alzheimer's has been a major research focus in the last decade. However, to infer cause-effect relationships rather than simple associations from observational data, we need to (i) express the causal relationships leading to cognitive decline in a graphical model, and (ii) ensure the causal effect of interest is identifiable from the collected data. We derive a causal graph from the current clinical knowledge on cause and effect in the Alzheimer's disease continuum, and show that identifiability of the causal effect requires all confounders to be known and measured. However, in complex neuroimaging studies, we neither know all potential confounders nor do we have data on them. To alleviate this requirement, we leverage the dependencies among multiple causes by deriving a substitute confounder via a probabilistic latent factor model. In our theoretical analysis, we prove that using the substitute confounder enables identifiability of the causal effect of neuroanatomy on cognition. We quantitatively evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on semi-synthetic data, where we know the true causal effects, and illustrate its use on real data on the Alzheimer's disease continuum, where it reveals important causes that otherwise would have been missed.

Related papers

• Identifiable Latent Polynomial Causal Models Through the Lens of Change [82.14087963690561]
  Causal representation learning aims to unveil latent high-level causal representations from observed low-level data. One of its primary tasks is to provide reliable assurance of identifying these latent causal models, known as identifiability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T07:46:10Z)
• The Impact of Missing Data on Causal Discovery: A Multicentric Clinical Study [1.173358409934101]
  We use data from a multi-centric study on endometrial cancer to analyze the impact of different missingness mechanisms on the recovered causal graph. We validate the recovered graph with expert physicians, showing that our approach finds clinically-relevant solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T08:46:30Z)
• DOMINO: Visual Causal Reasoning with Time-Dependent Phenomena [59.291745595756346]
  We propose a set of visual analytics methods that allow humans to participate in the discovery of causal relations associated with windows of time delay. Specifically, we leverage a well-established method, logic-based causality, to enable analysts to test the significance of potential causes. Since an effect can be a cause of other effects, we allow users to aggregate different temporal cause-effect relations found with our method into a visual flow diagram.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-12T03:40:21Z)
• Learning interpretable causal networks from very large datasets, application to 400,000 medical records of breast cancer patients [1.2647816797166165]
  We report a more reliable and scalable causal discovery method (iMIIC) based on a general mutual information supremum principle. We showcase iMIIC on synthetic and real-life healthcare data from 396,179 breast cancer patients from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-11T15:18:19Z)
• On Learning Necessary and Sufficient Causal Graphs [29.339455706346193]
  In practice, only a small subset of variables in the graph are relevant to the outcomes of interest. We propose learning a class of necessary and sufficient causal graphs (NSCG) that exclusively comprises causally relevant variables for an outcome of interest. We develop a necessary and sufficient causal structural learning (NSCSL) algorithm, by establishing theoretical properties and relationships between probabilities of causation and natural causal effects of features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-29T08:19:15Z)
• Evaluation of Induced Expert Knowledge in Causal Structure Learning by NOTEARS [1.5469452301122175]
  We study the impact of expert knowledge on causal relations in the form of additional constraints used in the formulation of the nonparametric NOTEARS model. We found that (i) knowledge that corrects the mistakes of the NOTEARS model can lead to statistically significant improvements, (ii) constraints on active edges have a larger positive impact on causal discovery than inactive edges, and surprisingly, (iii) the induced knowledge does not correct on average more incorrect active and/or inactive edges than expected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-04T20:39:39Z)
• On How AI Needs to Change to Advance the Science of Drug Discovery [0.0]
  We present causal drug discovery as the craft of creating models that ground the process of drug discovery in causal reasoning. In this attention paper, we present causal drug discovery as the craft of creating models that ground the process of drug discovery in causal reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-23T19:35:51Z)
• CausalDialogue: Modeling Utterance-level Causality in Conversations [83.03604651485327]
  We have compiled and expanded upon a new dataset called CausalDialogue through crowd-sourcing. This dataset includes multiple cause-effect pairs within a directed acyclic graph (DAG) structure. We propose a causality-enhanced method called Exponential Average Treatment Effect (ExMATE) to enhance the impact of causality at the utterance level in training neural conversation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T18:31:50Z)
• Active Bayesian Causal Inference [72.70593653185078]
  We propose Active Bayesian Causal Inference (ABCI), a fully-Bayesian active learning framework for integrated causal discovery and reasoning. ABCI jointly infers a posterior over causal models and queries of interest. We show that our approach is more data-efficient than several baselines that only focus on learning the full causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-04T22:38:57Z)
• Why Interpretable Causal Inference is Important for High-Stakes Decision Making for Critically Ill Patients and How To Do It [80.24494623756839]
  We present a framework for interpretable estimation of causal effects for critically ill patients. We apply this framework to the effect of seizures and other potentially harmful electrical events in the brain on outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T18:03:35Z)
• ACRE: Abstract Causal REasoning Beyond Covariation [90.99059920286484]
  We introduce the Abstract Causal REasoning dataset for systematic evaluation of current vision systems in causal induction. Motivated by the stream of research on causal discovery in Blicket experiments, we query a visual reasoning system with the following four types of questions in either an independent scenario or an interventional scenario. We notice that pure neural models tend towards an associative strategy under their chance-level performance, whereas neuro-symbolic combinations struggle in backward-blocking reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-26T02:42:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.