Learning Individualized Treatment Rules with Estimated Translated Inverse Propensity Score

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01083v1
• Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 13:13:56 GMT
• Title: Learning Individualized Treatment Rules with Estimated Translated Inverse Propensity Score
• Authors: Zhiliang Wu, Yinchong Yang, Yunpu Ma, Yushan Liu, Rui Zhao, Michael Moor, Volker Tresp
• Abstract summary: In this paper, we focus on learning individualized treatment rules (ITRs) to derive a treatment policy. In our framework, we cast ITRs learning as a contextual bandit problem and minimize the expected risk of the treatment policy. As a long-term goal, our derived policy might eventually lead to better clinical guidelines for the administration of IV and VP.
• Score: 29.606141542532356
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Randomized controlled trials typically analyze the effectiveness of treatments with the goal of making treatment recommendations for patient subgroups. With the advance of electronic health records, a great variety of data has been collected in clinical practice, enabling the evaluation of treatments and treatment policies based on observational data. In this paper, we focus on learning individualized treatment rules (ITRs) to derive a treatment policy that is expected to generate a better outcome for an individual patient. In our framework, we cast ITRs learning as a contextual bandit problem and minimize the expected risk of the treatment policy. We conduct experiments with the proposed framework both in a simulation study and based on a real-world dataset. In the latter case, we apply our proposed method to learn the optimal ITRs for the administration of intravenous (IV) fluids and vasopressors (VP). Based on various offline evaluation methods, we could show that the policy derived in our framework demonstrates better performance compared to both the physicians and other baselines, including a simple treatment prediction approach. As a long-term goal, our derived policy might eventually lead to better clinical guidelines for the administration of IV and VP.

Related papers

• Robust Learning for Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes with Observational Data [0.0]
  We study the statistical learning of optimal dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) that guide the optimal treatment assignment for each individual at each stage based on the individual's evolving history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-30T02:33:39Z)
• Safe and Interpretable Estimation of Optimal Treatment Regimes [54.257304443780434]
  We operationalize a safe and interpretable framework to identify optimal treatment regimes. Our findings support personalized treatment strategies based on a patient's medical history and pharmacological features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T19:59:10Z)
• Improved Policy Evaluation for Randomized Trials of Algorithmic Resource Allocation [54.72195809248172]
  We present a new estimator leveraging our proposed novel concept, that involves retrospective reshuffling of participants across experimental arms at the end of an RCT. We prove theoretically that such an estimator is more accurate than common estimators based on sample means.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T05:17:22Z)
• Adaptive Semi-Supervised Inference for Optimal Treatment Decisions with Electronic Medical Record Data [18.77246683875067]
  The optimal treatment regime that yields the greatest overall expected clinical outcome of interest has attracted a lot of attention. We consider estimation of the optimal treatment regime with electronic medical record data under a semi-supervised setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-04T13:54:35Z)
• Clinical Outcome Prediction from Admission Notes using Self-Supervised Knowledge Integration [55.88616573143478]
  Outcome prediction from clinical text can prevent doctors from overlooking possible risks. Diagnoses at discharge, procedures performed, in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay prediction are four common outcome prediction targets. We propose clinical outcome pre-training to integrate knowledge about patient outcomes from multiple public sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-08T10:26:44Z)
• MIA-Prognosis: A Deep Learning Framework to Predict Therapy Response [58.0291320452122]
  This paper aims at a unified deep learning approach to predict patient prognosis and therapy response. We formalize the prognosis modeling as a multi-modal asynchronous time series classification task. Our predictive model could further stratify low-risk and high-risk patients in terms of long-term survival.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-08T15:30:17Z)
• Treatment Policy Learning in Multiobjective Settings with Fully Observed Outcomes [6.944742823560999]
  We present, compare, and evaluate three approaches for learning individualized treatment policies. We show that all approaches learn policies that achieve strictly better performance on all outcomes than clinicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-01T13:22:51Z)
• DTR Bandit: Learning to Make Response-Adaptive Decisions With Low Regret [59.81290762273153]
  Dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) are personalized, adaptive, multi-stage treatment plans that adapt treatment decisions to an individual's initial features and to intermediate outcomes and features at each subsequent stage. We propose a novel algorithm that, by carefully balancing exploration and exploitation, is guaranteed to achieve rate-optimal regret when the transition and reward models are linear.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-06T13:03:42Z)
• Near-optimal Individualized Treatment Recommendations [9.585155938486048]
  individualized treatment recommendation (ITR) is an important analytic framework for precision medicine. We propose two methods to estimate the optimal A-ITR within the outcome weighted learning (OWL) framework. We show the consistency of these methods and obtain an upper bound for the risk between the theoretically optimal recommendation and the estimated one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-06T15:59:33Z)
• Optimizing Medical Treatment for Sepsis in Intensive Care: from Reinforcement Learning to Pre-Trial Evaluation [2.908482270923597]
  Our aim is to establish a framework where reinforcement learning (RL) of optimizing interventions retrospectively allows us a regulatory compliant pathway to prospective clinical testing of the learned policies. We focus on infections in intensive care units which are one of the major causes of death and difficult to treat because of the complex and opaque patient dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-13T20:31:47Z)
• Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
  We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication. We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance. We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.