Algorithmic Stability in Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods Among Two Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15203v2
• Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 15:58:27 GMT
• Title: Algorithmic Stability in Fair Allocation of Indivisible Goods Among Two Agents
• Authors: Vijay Menon and Kate Larson
• Abstract summary: We show that it is impossible to achieve exact stability along with a weak notion of fairness and even approximate efficiency. We propose two relaxations to stability, namely, approximate-stability and weak-approximate-stability. We present a general characterization result for pairwise maximin share allocations, and in turn use it to design an algorithm that is approximately-stable.
• Score: 8.66798555194688
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Many allocation problems in multiagent systems rely on agents specifying cardinal preferences. However, allocation mechanisms can be sensitive to small perturbations in cardinal preferences, thus causing agents who make ``small" or ``innocuous" mistakes while reporting their preferences to experience a large change in their utility for the final outcome. To address this, we introduce a notion of algorithmic stability and study it in the context of fair and efficient allocations of indivisible goods among two agents. We show that it is impossible to achieve exact stability along with even a weak notion of fairness and even approximate efficiency. As a result, we propose two relaxations to stability, namely, approximate-stability and weak-approximate-stability, and show how existing algorithms in the fair division literature that guarantee fair and efficient outcomes perform poorly with respect to these relaxations. This leads us to explore the possibility of designing new algorithms that are more stable. Towards this end, we present a general characterization result for pairwise maximin share allocations, and in turn use it to design an algorithm that is approximately-stable and guarantees a pairwise maximin share and Pareto optimal allocation for two agents. Finally, we present a simple framework that can be used to modify existing fair and efficient algorithms in order to ensure that they also achieve weak-approximate-stability.

Related papers

• Putting Gale & Shapley to Work: Guaranteeing Stability Through Learning [14.448192914855674]
  Two-sided matching markets describe a class of problems wherein participants from one side of the market must be matched to those from the other side according to their preferences. We exploit the structure of stable solutions to devise algorithms that improve the likelihood of finding stable solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T06:47:53Z)
• Understanding Fairness Surrogate Functions in Algorithmic Fairness [21.555040357521907]
  We show that there is a surrogate-fairness gap between the fairness definition and the fairness surrogate function. We elaborate a novel and general algorithm called Balanced Surrogate, which iteratively reduces the gap to mitigate unfairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T12:40:53Z)
• Federated Distributionally Robust Optimization with Non-Convex Objectives: Algorithm and Analysis [24.64654924173679]
  Asynchronous distributed algorithm named Asynchronous Single-looP alternatIve gRadient projEction is proposed. New uncertainty set, i.e., constrained D-norm uncertainty set, is developed to leverage the prior distribution and flexibly control the degree of robustness. empirical studies on real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed method can not only achieve fast convergence, but also remain robust against data as well as malicious attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T01:56:57Z)
• Group Fairness with Uncertainty in Sensitive Attributes [34.608332397776245]
  A fair predictive model is crucial to mitigate biased decisions against minority groups in high-stakes applications. We propose a bootstrap-based algorithm that achieves the target level of fairness despite the uncertainty in sensitive attributes. Our algorithm is applicable to both discrete and continuous sensitive attributes and is effective in real-world classification and regression tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T04:33:00Z)
• Fairness in Matching under Uncertainty [78.39459690570531]
  algorithmic two-sided marketplaces have drawn attention to the issue of fairness in such settings. We axiomatize a notion of individual fairness in the two-sided marketplace setting which respects the uncertainty in the merits. We design a linear programming framework to find fair utility-maximizing distributions over allocations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T00:30:32Z)
• Practical Approaches for Fair Learning with Multitype and Multivariate Sensitive Attributes [70.6326967720747]
  It is important to guarantee that machine learning algorithms deployed in the real world do not result in unfairness or unintended social consequences. We introduce FairCOCCO, a fairness measure built on cross-covariance operators on reproducing kernel Hilbert Spaces. We empirically demonstrate consistent improvements against state-of-the-art techniques in balancing predictive power and fairness on real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T11:28:46Z)
• Distributed Distributionally Robust Optimization with Non-Convex Objectives [24.64654924173679]
  Asynchronous distributed algorithm named Asynchronous Single-looP alternatIve gRadient projEction is proposed. New uncertainty set, i.e., constrained D-norm uncertainty set, is developed to leverage the prior distribution and flexibly control the degree of robustness. empirical studies on real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed method can not only achieve fast convergence, but also remain robust against data as well as malicious attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-14T07:39:13Z)
• Optimal Algorithms for Decentralized Stochastic Variational Inequalities [113.43047601775453]
  This work concentrates on the decentralized setting, which is increasingly important but not well understood. We present lower bounds for both communication and local iterations and construct optimal algorithms that match these lower bounds. Our algorithms are the best among the available not only in the decentralized case, but also in the deterministic and non-distributed literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-06T13:14:02Z)
• Learning Equilibria in Matching Markets from Bandit Feedback [139.29934476625488]
  We develop a framework and algorithms for learning stable market outcomes under uncertainty. Our work takes a first step toward elucidating when and how stable matchings arise in large, data-driven marketplaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-19T17:59:28Z)
• Stochastic Gradient Descent-Ascent and Consensus Optimization for Smooth Games: Convergence Analysis under Expected Co-coercivity [49.66890309455787]
  We introduce the expected co-coercivity condition, explain its benefits, and provide the first last-iterate convergence guarantees of SGDA and SCO. We prove linear convergence of both methods to a neighborhood of the solution when they use constant step-size. Our convergence guarantees hold under the arbitrary sampling paradigm, and we give insights into the complexity of minibatching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-30T18:32:46Z)
• Beyond Individual and Group Fairness [90.4666341812857]
  We present a new data-driven model of fairness that is guided by the unfairness complaints received by the system. Our model supports multiple fairness criteria and takes into account their potential incompatibilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T14:14:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.