Adversarial Radar Inference: Inverse Tracking, Identifying Cognition and Designing Smart Interference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.01559v2
• Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:10:18 GMT
• Title: Adversarial Radar Inference: Inverse Tracking, Identifying Cognition and Designing Smart Interference
• Authors: Vikram Krishnamurthy and Kunal Pattanayak and Sandeep Gogineni and Bosung Kang and Muralidhar Rangaswamy
• Abstract summary: This paper considers three inter-related adversarial inference problems involving cognitive radars. We first discuss inverse tracking of the radar to estimate the adversary's estimate of us based on radar's actions and calibrate the radar's sensing accuracy. Second, using revealed preference from microeconomics, we formulate a non-parametric test to identify if the cognitive radar is a constrained utility maximizer with signal processing constraints.
• Score: 15.04540534703128
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper considers three inter-related adversarial inference problems involving cognitive radars. We first discuss inverse tracking of the radar to estimate the adversary's estimate of us based on the radar's actions and calibrate the radar's sensing accuracy. Second, using revealed preference from microeconomics, we formulate a non-parametric test to identify if the cognitive radar is a constrained utility maximizer with signal processing constraints. We consider two radar functionalities, namely, beam allocation and waveform design, with respect to which the cognitive radar is assumed to maximize its utility and construct a set-valued estimator for the radar's utility function. Finally, we discuss how to engineer interference at the physical layer level to confuse the radar which forces it to change its transmit waveform. The levels of abstraction range from smart interference design based on Wiener filters (at the pulse/waveform level), inverse Kalman filters at the tracking level and revealed preferences for identifying utility maximization at the systems level.

Related papers

• Echoes Beyond Points: Unleashing the Power of Raw Radar Data in Multi-modality Fusion [74.84019379368807]
  We propose a novel method named EchoFusion to skip the existing radar signal processing pipeline. Specifically, we first generate the Bird's Eye View (BEV) queries and then take corresponding spectrum features from radar to fuse with other sensors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T09:53:50Z)
• Bi-LRFusion: Bi-Directional LiDAR-Radar Fusion for 3D Dynamic Object Detection [78.59426158981108]
  We introduce a bi-directional LiDAR-Radar fusion framework, termed Bi-LRFusion, to tackle the challenges and improve 3D detection for dynamic objects. We conduct extensive experiments on nuScenes and ORR datasets, and show that our Bi-LRFusion achieves state-of-the-art performance for detecting dynamic objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T10:57:41Z)
• Semantic Segmentation of Radar Detections using Convolutions on Point Clouds [59.45414406974091]
  We introduce a deep-learning based method to convolve radar detections into point clouds. We adapt this algorithm to radar-specific properties through distance-dependent clustering and pre-processing of input point clouds. Our network outperforms state-of-the-art approaches that are based on PointNet++ on the task of semantic segmentation of radar point clouds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T07:09:35Z)
• How can a Radar Mask its Cognition? [19.044614610714856]
  A cognitive radar can em hide its strategy from an adversary that detects cognition. The radar does so by transmitting purposefully designed sub-optimal responses to spoof the adversary's Neyman-Pearson detector. We show that small purposeful deviations from the optimal strategy of the radar confuse the adversary by significant amounts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-20T17:45:55Z)
• Meta-Cognition. An Inverse-Inverse Reinforcement Learning Approach for Cognitive Radars [19.044614610714856]
  A cognitive radar optimally adapts its waveform (response) in response to maneuvers (probes) of a possibly adversarial moving target. How should the meta-cognitive radar choose its responses to sufficiently confuse the adversary trying to estimate the radar's utility function? We call this counter-adversarial step taken by the meta-cognitive radar as inverse inverse reinforcement learning (I-IRL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-03T21:39:36Z)
• Unsupervised Domain Adaptation across FMCW Radar Configurations Using Margin Disparity Discrepancy [17.464353263281907]
  In this work, we consider the problem of unsupervised domain adaptation across radar configurations in the context of deep-learning human activity classification. We focus on the theory-inspired technique of Margin Disparity Discrepancy, which has already been proved successful in the area of computer vision. Our experiments extend this technique to radar data, achieving a comparable accuracy to fewshot supervised approaches for the same classification problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T09:11:06Z)
• Waveform Selection for Radar Tracking in Target Channels With Memory via Universal Learning [14.796960833031724]
  Adapting the radar's waveform using partial information about the state of the scene has been shown to provide performance benefits in many practical scenarios. This work examines a radar system which builds a compressed model of the radar-environment interface in the form of a context-tree. The proposed approach is tested in a simulation study, and is shown to provide tracking performance improvements over two state-of-the-art waveform selection schemes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-02T21:27:56Z)
• Complex-valued Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Radar Signal Denoising and Interference Mitigation [73.0103413636673]
  We propose the use of Complex-Valued Convolutional Neural Networks (CVCNNs) to address the issue of mutual interference between radar sensors. CVCNNs increase data efficiency, speeds up network training and substantially improves the conservation of phase information during interference removal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-29T10:06:29Z)
• Constrained Contextual Bandit Learning for Adaptive Radar Waveform Selection [14.796960833031724]
  A sequential decision process in which an adaptive radar system repeatedly interacts with a finite-state target channel is studied. The radar is capable of passively sensing the spectrum at regular intervals, which provides side information for the waveform selection process. It is shown that the waveform selection problem can be effectively addressed using a linear contextual bandit formulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-09T16:43:50Z)
• LiRaNet: End-to-End Trajectory Prediction using Spatio-Temporal Radar Fusion [52.59664614744447]
  We present LiRaNet, a novel end-to-end trajectory prediction method which utilizes radar sensor information along with widely used lidar and high definition (HD) maps. automotive radar provides rich, complementary information, allowing for longer range vehicle detection as well as instantaneous velocity measurements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-02T00:13:00Z)
• RadarNet: Exploiting Radar for Robust Perception of Dynamic Objects [73.80316195652493]
  We tackle the problem of exploiting Radar for perception in the context of self-driving cars. We propose a new solution that exploits both LiDAR and Radar sensors for perception. Our approach, dubbed RadarNet, features a voxel-based early fusion and an attention-based late fusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-28T17:15:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.