Estimating the time-lapse between medical insurance reimbursement with non-parametric regression models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.08624v1
• Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 18:39:12 GMT
• Title: Estimating the time-lapse between medical insurance reimbursement with non-parametric regression models
• Authors: Mary Akinyemi, Chika Yinka-Banjo, Ogban-Asuquo Ugot, Akwarandu Ugo Nwachuku
• Abstract summary: We comparatively study the properties of four nonparametric algorithms, K-Nearest Neighbours (KNNs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Decision trees and Random forests. The supervised learning task is a regression estimate of the time-lapse in medical insurance reimbursement.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Non-parametric supervised learning algorithms represent a succinct class of supervised learning algorithms where the learning parameters are highly flexible and whose values are directly dependent on the size of the training data. In this paper, we comparatively study the properties of four nonparametric algorithms, K-Nearest Neighbours (KNNs), Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Decision trees and Random forests. The supervised learning task is a regression estimate of the time-lapse in medical insurance reimbursement. Our study is concerned precisely with how well each of the nonparametric regression models fits the training data. We quantify the goodness of fit using the R-squared metric. The results are presented with a focus on the effect of the size of the training data, the feature space dimension and hyperparameter optimization.

Related papers

• Exploring Training and Inference Scaling Laws in Generative Retrieval [50.82554729023865]
  We investigate how model size, training data scale, and inference-time compute jointly influence generative retrieval performance. Our experiments show that n-gram-based methods demonstrate strong alignment with both training and inference scaling laws. We find that LLaMA models consistently outperform T5 models, suggesting a particular advantage for larger decoder-only models in generative retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T17:59:03Z)
• Dynamic Loss-Based Sample Reweighting for Improved Large Language Model Pretraining [55.262510814326035]
  Existing reweighting strategies primarily focus on group-level data importance. We introduce novel algorithms for dynamic, instance-level data reweighting. Our framework allows us to devise reweighting strategies deprioritizing redundant or uninformative data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T17:57:15Z)
• Capturing the Temporal Dependence of Training Data Influence [100.91355498124527]
  We formalize the concept of trajectory-specific leave-one-out influence, which quantifies the impact of removing a data point during training. We propose data value embedding, a novel technique enabling efficient approximation of trajectory-specific LOO. As data value embedding captures training data ordering, it offers valuable insights into model training dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T18:28:55Z)
• What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Reasoning? [83.83230167222852]
  We find that a model's generalization behavior can be effectively characterized by a training metric we call pre-memorization train accuracy. By connecting a model's learning behavior to its generalization, pre-memorization train accuracy can guide targeted improvements to training strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T09:52:40Z)
• Attribute-to-Delete: Machine Unlearning via Datamodel Matching [65.13151619119782]
  Machine unlearning -- efficiently removing a small "forget set" training data on a pre-divertrained machine learning model -- has recently attracted interest. Recent research shows that machine unlearning techniques do not hold up in such a challenging setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:20:10Z)
• Querying Easily Flip-flopped Samples for Deep Active Learning [63.62397322172216]
  Active learning is a machine learning paradigm that aims to improve the performance of a model by strategically selecting and querying unlabeled data. One effective selection strategy is to base it on the model's predictive uncertainty, which can be interpreted as a measure of how informative a sample is. This paper proposes the it least disagree metric (LDM) as the smallest probability of disagreement of the predicted label.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T08:12:23Z)
• On the Convergence of Loss and Uncertainty-based Active Learning Algorithms [3.506897386829711]
  We investigate the convergence rates and data sample sizes required for training a machine learning model using a gradient descent (SGD) algorithm. We present convergence results for linear classifiers and linearly separable datasets using squared hinge loss and similar training loss functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T15:22:07Z)
• Target Variable Engineering [0.0]
  We compare the predictive performance of regression models trained to predict numeric targets vs. classifiers trained to predict their binarized counterparts. We find that regression requires significantly more computational effort to converge upon the optimal performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T23:12:21Z)
• Stabilizing Subject Transfer in EEG Classification with Divergence Estimation [17.924276728038304]
  We propose several graphical models to describe an EEG classification task. We identify statistical relationships that should hold true in an idealized training scenario. We design regularization penalties to enforce these relationships in two stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T23:06:52Z)
• Information bottleneck theory of high-dimensional regression: relevancy, efficiency and optimality [6.700873164609009]
  Overfitting is a central challenge in machine learning, yet many large neural networks readily achieve zero training loss. We quantify overfitting via residual information, defined as the bits in fitted models that encode noise in training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-08T00:09:12Z)
• Data splitting improves statistical performance in overparametrized regimes [0.0]
  Distributed learning is a common strategy to reduce the overall training time by exploiting multiple computing devices. We show that in this regime, data splitting has a regularizing effect, hence improving statistical performance and computational complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-21T08:10:56Z)
• ALT-MAS: A Data-Efficient Framework for Active Testing of Machine Learning Algorithms [58.684954492439424]
  We propose a novel framework to efficiently test a machine learning model using only a small amount of labeled test data. The idea is to estimate the metrics of interest for a model-under-test using Bayesian neural network (BNN)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-11T12:14:04Z)
• Predicting Training Time Without Training [120.92623395389255]
  We tackle the problem of predicting the number of optimization steps that a pre-trained deep network needs to converge to a given value of the loss function. We leverage the fact that the training dynamics of a deep network during fine-tuning are well approximated by those of a linearized model. We are able to predict the time it takes to fine-tune a model to a given loss without having to perform any training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-28T04:29:54Z)
• Machine learning for causal inference: on the use of cross-fit estimators [77.34726150561087]
  Doubly-robust cross-fit estimators have been proposed to yield better statistical properties. We conducted a simulation study to assess the performance of several estimators for the average causal effect (ACE) When used with machine learning, the doubly-robust cross-fit estimators substantially outperformed all of the other estimators in terms of bias, variance, and confidence interval coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T23:09:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.