Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged
Fraudsters
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.08692v1
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 22:33:12 GMT
- Title: Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged
Fraudsters
- Authors: Yingtong Dou, Zhiwei Liu, Li Sun, Yutong Deng, Hao Peng, Philip S. Yu
- Abstract summary: We introduce two types of camouflages based on recent empirical studies, i.e., the feature camouflage and the relation camouflage.
Existing GNNs have not addressed these two camouflages, which results in their poor performance in fraud detection problems.
We propose a new model named CAmouflage-REsistant GNN (CARE-GNN) to enhance the GNN aggregation process with three unique modules against camouflages.
- Score: 78.53851936180348
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely applied to fraud detection
problems in recent years, revealing the suspiciousness of nodes by aggregating
their neighborhood information via different relations. However, few prior
works have noticed the camouflage behavior of fraudsters, which could hamper
the performance of GNN-based fraud detectors during the aggregation process. In
this paper, we introduce two types of camouflages based on recent empirical
studies, i.e., the feature camouflage and the relation camouflage. Existing
GNNs have not addressed these two camouflages, which results in their poor
performance in fraud detection problems. Alternatively, we propose a new model
named CAmouflage-REsistant GNN (CARE-GNN), to enhance the GNN aggregation
process with three unique modules against camouflages. Concretely, we first
devise a label-aware similarity measure to find informative neighboring nodes.
Then, we leverage reinforcement learning (RL) to find the optimal amounts of
neighbors to be selected. Finally, the selected neighbors across different
relations are aggregated together. Comprehensive experiments on two real-world
fraud datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the RL algorithm. The proposed
CARE-GNN also outperforms state-of-the-art GNNs and GNN-based fraud detectors.
We integrate all GNN-based fraud detectors as an opensource toolbox:
https://github.com/safe-graph/DGFraud. The CARE-GNN code and datasets are
available at https://github.com/YingtongDou/CARE-GNN.
Related papers
- ELEGANT: Certified Defense on the Fairness of Graph Neural Networks [94.10433608311604]
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as a prominent graph learning model in various graph-based tasks.
malicious attackers could easily corrupt the fairness level of their predictions by adding perturbations to the input graph data.
We propose a principled framework named ELEGANT to study a novel problem of certifiable defense on the fairness level of GNNs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-05T20:29:40Z) - Transaction Fraud Detection via an Adaptive Graph Neural Network [64.9428588496749]
We propose an Adaptive Sampling and Aggregation-based Graph Neural Network (ASA-GNN) that learns discriminative representations to improve the performance of transaction fraud detection.
A neighbor sampling strategy is performed to filter noisy nodes and supplement information for fraudulent nodes.
Experiments on three real financial datasets demonstrate that the proposed method ASA-GNN outperforms state-of-the-art ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-11T07:48:39Z) - The Devil is in the Conflict: Disentangled Information Graph Neural
Networks for Fraud Detection [17.254383007779616]
We argue that the performance degradation is mainly attributed to the inconsistency between topology and attribute.
We propose a simple and effective method that uses the attention mechanism to adaptively fuse two views.
Our model can significantly outperform stateof-the-art baselines on real-world fraud detection datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-22T08:21:49Z) - A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Graph Neural Networks: Privacy,
Robustness, Fairness, and Explainability [59.80140875337769]
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have made rapid developments in the recent years.
GNNs can leak private information, are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, can inherit and magnify societal bias from training data.
This paper gives a comprehensive survey of GNNs in the computational aspects of privacy, robustness, fairness, and explainability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-18T21:41:07Z) - Improving Fraud detection via Hierarchical Attention-based Graph Neural
Network [6.7713383844867385]
Graph Neural Network (HA-GNN) for fraud detection incorporates weighted adjacency matrices across different relations against camouflage.
We generate node embeddings by aggregating information from local/long-range structures and original node features.
Experiments on three real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our model over the state-of-the-arts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-12T16:27:16Z) - Identity-aware Graph Neural Networks [63.6952975763946]
We develop a class of message passing Graph Neural Networks (ID-GNNs) with greater expressive power than the 1-WL test.
ID-GNN extends existing GNN architectures by inductively considering nodes' identities during message passing.
We show that transforming existing GNNs to ID-GNNs yields on average 40% accuracy improvement on challenging node, edge, and graph property prediction tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-25T18:59:01Z) - Alleviating the Inconsistency Problem of Applying Graph Neural Network
to Fraud Detection [78.88163190021798]
We introduce a new GNN framework, $mathsfGraphConsis$, to tackle the inconsistency problem.
Empirical analysis on four datasets indicates the inconsistency problem is crucial in a fraud detection task.
We also released a GNN-based fraud detection toolbox with implementations of SOTA models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-01T21:43:58Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.