Minimum discrepancy principle strategy for choosing $k$ in $k$-NN regression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.08718v8
• Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 17:28:01 GMT
• Title: Minimum discrepancy principle strategy for choosing $k$ in $k$-NN regression
• Authors: Yaroslav Averyanov, Alain Celisse,
• Abstract summary: We present a novel data-driven strategy to choose the hyper parameter $k$ in the $k$-NN regression estimator without using any hold-out data. We propose using an easily implemented in practice strategy based on the idea of early stopping and the minimum discrepancy principle.
• Score: 2.0411082897313984
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We present a novel data-driven strategy to choose the hyperparameter $k$ in the $k$-NN regression estimator without using any hold-out data. We treat the problem of choosing the hyperparameter as an iterative procedure (over $k$) and propose using an easily implemented in practice strategy based on the idea of early stopping and the minimum discrepancy principle. This model selection strategy is proven to be minimax-optimal over some smoothness function classes, for instance, the Lipschitz functions class on a bounded domain. The novel method often improves statistical performance on artificial and real-world data sets in comparison to other model selection strategies, such as the Hold-out method, 5-fold cross-validation, and AIC criterion. The novelty of the strategy comes from reducing the computational time of the model selection procedure while preserving the statistical (minimax) optimality of the resulting estimator. More precisely, given a sample of size $n$, if one should choose $k$ among $\left\{ 1, \ldots, n \right\}$, and $\left\{ f^1, \ldots, f^n \right\}$ are the estimators of the regression function, the minimum discrepancy principle requires the calculation of a fraction of the estimators, while this is not the case for the generalized cross-validation, Akaike's AIC criteria, or Lepskii principle.

Related papers

• Online non-parametric likelihood-ratio estimation by Pearson-divergence functional minimization [55.98760097296213]
  We introduce a new framework for online non-parametric LRE (OLRE) for the setting where pairs of iid observations $(x_t sim p, x'_t sim q)$ are observed over time. We provide theoretical guarantees for the performance of the OLRE method along with empirical validation in synthetic experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T13:20:11Z)
• Bayes beats Cross Validation: Efficient and Accurate Ridge Regression via Expectation Maximization [3.061662434597098]
  We present a method for the regularization hyper- parameter, $lambda$, that is faster to compute than leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) We show that the proposed method is guaranteed to find a unique optimal solution for large enough $n$, under relatively mild conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-29T01:13:55Z)
• Offline Primal-Dual Reinforcement Learning for Linear MDPs [16.782625445546273]
  Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL) aims to learn a near-optimal policy from a fixed dataset of transitions collected by another policy. This paper proposes a primal-dual optimization method based on the linear programming formulation of RL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T11:45:23Z)
• Nearly Minimax Optimal Reinforcement Learning for Linear Markov Decision Processes [80.89852729380425]
  We propose the first computationally efficient algorithm that achieves the nearly minimax optimal regret $tilde O(dsqrtH3K)$. Our work provides a complete answer to optimal RL with linear MDPs, and the developed algorithm and theoretical tools may be of independent interest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-12T18:58:59Z)
• Streaming Sparse Linear Regression [1.8707139489039097]
  We propose a novel online sparse linear regression framework for analyzing streaming data when data points arrive sequentially. Our proposed method is memory efficient and requires less stringent restricted strong convexity assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-11T07:31:55Z)
• Best Policy Identification in Linear MDPs [70.57916977441262]
  We investigate the problem of best identification in discounted linear Markov+Delta Decision in the fixed confidence setting under a generative model. The lower bound as the solution of an intricate non- optimization program can be used as the starting point to devise such algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-11T04:12:50Z)
• Human-in-the-loop: Provably Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximation [107.54516740713969]
  We study human-in-the-loop reinforcement learning (RL) with trajectory preferences. Instead of receiving a numeric reward at each step, the agent only receives preferences over trajectory pairs from a human overseer. We propose the first optimistic model-based algorithm for PbRL with general function approximation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T09:03:24Z)
• Breaking the Sample Complexity Barrier to Regret-Optimal Model-Free Reinforcement Learning [52.76230802067506]
  A novel model-free algorithm is proposed to minimize regret in episodic reinforcement learning. The proposed algorithm employs an em early-settled reference update rule, with the aid of two Q-learning sequences. The design principle of our early-settled variance reduction method might be of independent interest to other RL settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-09T21:13:48Z)
• Minimax-Optimal Off-Policy Evaluation with Linear Function Approximation [49.502277468627035]
  This paper studies the statistical theory of batch data reinforcement learning with function approximation. Consider the off-policy evaluation problem, which is to estimate the cumulative value of a new target policy from logged history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-21T19:20:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.