How to tune the RBF SVM hyperparameters?: An empirical evaluation of 18 search algorithms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11655v1
• Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:28:48 GMT
• Title: How to tune the RBF SVM hyperparameters?: An empirical evaluation of 18 search algorithms
• Authors: Jacques Wainer and Pablo Fonseca
• Abstract summary: We propose 18 proposed search algorithms for 115 real-life binary data sets. We find that Parss better searches with only a slight increase in time with respect to the same tree with with respect to the grid. We also find that there are no significant differences among the different procedures to the best set of data when more than one is found by the search algorithms.
• Score: 4.394728504061753
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: SVM with an RBF kernel is usually one of the best classification algorithms for most data sets, but it is important to tune the two hyperparameters $C$ and $\gamma$ to the data itself. In general, the selection of the hyperparameters is a non-convex optimization problem and thus many algorithms have been proposed to solve it, among them: grid search, random search, Bayesian optimization, simulated annealing, particle swarm optimization, Nelder Mead, and others. There have also been proposals to decouple the selection of $\gamma$ and $C$. We empirically compare 18 of these proposed search algorithms (with different parameterizations for a total of 47 combinations) on 115 real-life binary data sets. We find (among other things) that trees of Parzen estimators and particle swarm optimization select better hyperparameters with only a slight increase in computation time with respect to a grid search with the same number of evaluations. We also find that spending too much computational effort searching the hyperparameters will not likely result in better performance for future data and that there are no significant differences among the different procedures to select the best set of hyperparameters when more than one is found by the search algorithms.

Related papers

• Enhancing Machine Learning Model Performance with Hyper Parameter Optimization: A Comparative Study [0.0]
  One of the most critical issues in machine learning is the selection of appropriate hyper parameters for training models. Hyper parameter optimization (HPO) is a popular topic that artificial intelligence studies have focused on recently. In this study, classical methods, such as grid, random search and Bayesian optimization, and population-based algorithms, such as genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization, are discussed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-14T10:12:10Z)
• Massively Parallel Genetic Optimization through Asynchronous Propagation of Populations [50.591267188664666]
  Propulate is an evolutionary optimization algorithm and software package for global optimization. We provide an MPI-based implementation of our algorithm, which features variants of selection, mutation, crossover, and migration. We find that Propulate is up to three orders of magnitude faster without sacrificing solution accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-20T18:17:34Z)
• AUTOMATA: Gradient Based Data Subset Selection for Compute-Efficient Hyper-parameter Tuning [72.54359545547904]
  We propose a gradient-based subset selection framework for hyper- parameter tuning. We show that using gradient-based data subsets for hyper- parameter tuning achieves significantly faster turnaround times and speedups of 3$times$-30$times$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-15T19:25:01Z)
• A Comparative study of Hyper-Parameter Optimization Tools [2.6097538974670935]
  We compare the performance of four python libraries, namely Optuna, Hyperopt, Optunity, and sequential model algorithm configuration (SMAC) We found that Optuna has better performance for CASH problem and NeurIPS black-box optimization challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T14:49:36Z)
• Reducing the Variance of Gaussian Process Hyperparameter Optimization with Preconditioning [54.01682318834995]
  Preconditioning is a highly effective step for any iterative method involving matrix-vector multiplication. We prove that preconditioning has an additional benefit that has been previously unexplored. It simultaneously can reduce variance at essentially negligible cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-01T06:43:11Z)
• Provably Faster Algorithms for Bilevel Optimization [54.83583213812667]
  Bilevel optimization has been widely applied in many important machine learning applications. We propose two new algorithms for bilevel optimization. We show that both algorithms achieve the complexity of $mathcalO(epsilon-1.5)$, which outperforms all existing algorithms by the order of magnitude.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T21:05:30Z)
• Bayesian Algorithm Execution: Estimating Computable Properties of Black-box Functions Using Mutual Information [78.78486761923855]
  In many real world problems, we want to infer some property of an expensive black-box function f, given a budget of T function evaluations. We present a procedure, InfoBAX, that sequentially chooses queries that maximize mutual information with respect to the algorithm's output. On these problems, InfoBAX uses up to 500 times fewer queries to f than required by the original algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T17:22:11Z)
• Optimizing Large-Scale Hyperparameters via Automated Learning Algorithm [97.66038345864095]
  We propose a new hyperparameter optimization method with zeroth-order hyper-gradients (HOZOG) Specifically, we first formulate hyperparameter optimization as an A-based constrained optimization problem. Then, we use the average zeroth-order hyper-gradients to update hyper parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T21:03:05Z)
• MementoML: Performance of selected machine learning algorithm configurations on OpenML100 datasets [5.802346990263708]
  We present the protocol of generating benchmark data describing the performance of different ML algorithms. Data collected in this way is used to study the factors influencing the algorithm's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-30T13:13:52Z)
• Weighted Random Search for Hyperparameter Optimization [0.0]
  We introduce an improved version of Random Search (RS), used here for hyper parameter optimization of machine learning algorithms. We generate new values for each hyper parameter with a probability of change, unlike the standard RS. Within the same computational budget, our method yields better results than the standard RS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-03T15:41:22Z)
• Weighted Random Search for CNN Hyperparameter Optimization [0.0]
  We introduce the weighted Random Search (WRS) method, a combination of Random Search (RS) and probabilistic greedy. The criterion is the classification accuracy achieved within the same number of tested combinations of hyperparameter values. According to our experiments, the WRS algorithm outperforms the other methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-30T09:40:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.