Naive Artificial Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.02185v1
• Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 13:40:10 GMT
• Title: Naive Artificial Intelligence
• Authors: Tomer Barak, Yehonatan Avidan and Yonatan Loewenstein
• Abstract summary: fluid intelligence is the ability to solve novel problems without relying on prior knowledge. Previous studies have shown that deep networks can solve some forms of intelligence tests, but only after extensive training. Here we present a computational model that solves intelligence tests without any prior training.
• Score: 0.8594140167290096
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In the cognitive sciences, it is common to distinguish between crystal intelligence, the ability to utilize knowledge acquired through past learning or experience and fluid intelligence, the ability to solve novel problems without relying on prior knowledge. Using this cognitive distinction between the two types of intelligence, extensively-trained deep networks that can play chess or Go exhibit crystal but not fluid intelligence. In humans, fluid intelligence is typically studied and quantified using intelligence tests. Previous studies have shown that deep networks can solve some forms of intelligence tests, but only after extensive training. Here we present a computational model that solves intelligence tests without any prior training. This ability is based on continual inductive reasoning, and is implemented by deep unsupervised latent-prediction networks. Our work demonstrates the potential fluid intelligence of deep networks. Finally, we propose that the computational principles underlying our approach can be used to model fluid intelligence in the cognitive sciences.

Related papers

• Deep Learning for Code Intelligence: Survey, Benchmark and Toolkit [63.82016263181941]
  Code intelligence leverages machine learning techniques to extract knowledge from extensive code corpora. Currently, there is already a thriving research community focusing on code intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-30T17:48:37Z)
• On a Functional Definition of Intelligence [0.0]
  Without an agreed-upon definition of intelligence, asking "is this system intelligent?"" is an untestable question. Most work on precisely capturing what we mean by "intelligence" has come from the fields of philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science. We present an argument for a purely functional, black-box definition of intelligence, distinct from how that intelligence is actually achieved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T05:46:49Z)
• AI for Mathematics: A Cognitive Science Perspective [86.02346372284292]
  Mathematics is one of the most powerful conceptual systems developed and used by the human species. Rapid progress in AI, particularly propelled by advances in large language models (LLMs), has sparked renewed, widespread interest in building such systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T02:00:31Z)
• A Theory of Intelligences [0.0]
  I develop a framework that applies across all systems from physics, to biology, humans and AI. I present general equations for intelligence and its components, and a simple expression for the evolution of intelligence traits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T20:18:43Z)
• Brain-Inspired Computational Intelligence via Predictive Coding [89.6335791546526]
  Predictive coding (PC) has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks. PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T16:37:16Z)
• The Nature of Intelligence [0.0]
  The essence of intelligence commonly represented by both humans and AI is unknown. We show that the nature of intelligence is a series of mathematically functional processes that minimize system entropy. This essay should be a starting point for a deeper understanding of the universe and us as human beings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-20T23:11:59Z)
• A World-Self Model Towards Understanding Intelligence [0.0]
  We will compare human and artificial intelligence, and propose that a certain aspect of human intelligence is the key to connect perception and cognition. We will present the broader idea of "concept", the principles and mathematical frameworks of the new model World-Self Model (WSM) of intelligence, and finally an unified general framework of intelligence based on WSM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T16:42:23Z)
• Intelligence as information processing: brains, swarms, and computers [0.0]
  There is no agreed definition of intelligence, so it is problematic to simply ask whether brains, swarms, computers, or other systems are intelligent or not. To compare the potential intelligence exhibited by different cognitive systems, I use the common approach used by artificial intelligence and artificial life.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-09T19:03:15Z)
• Towards a Universal Continuous Knowledge Base [49.95342223987143]
  We propose a method for building a continuous knowledge base that can store knowledge imported from multiple neural networks. Experiments on text classification show promising results. We import the knowledge from multiple models to the knowledge base, from which the fused knowledge is exported back to a single model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-25T12:27:44Z)
• Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition [108.89281493851358]
  A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles. This work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing. The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-30T18:29:25Z)
• Future Trends for Human-AI Collaboration: A Comprehensive Taxonomy of AI/AGI Using Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles [95.58955174499371]
  We describe various aspects of multiple human intelligences and learning styles, which may impact on a variety of AI problem domains. Future AI systems will be able not only to communicate with human users and each other, but also to efficiently exchange knowledge and wisdom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-07T21:00:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.