Intelligence as information processing: brains, swarms, and computers
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.05349v1
- Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 19:03:15 GMT
- Title: Intelligence as information processing: brains, swarms, and computers
- Authors: Carlos Gershenson
- Abstract summary: There is no agreed definition of intelligence, so it is problematic to simply ask whether brains, swarms, computers, or other systems are intelligent or not.
To compare the potential intelligence exhibited by different cognitive systems, I use the common approach used by artificial intelligence and artificial life.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: There is no agreed definition of intelligence, so it is problematic to simply
ask whether brains, swarms, computers, or other systems are intelligent or not.
To compare the potential intelligence exhibited by different cognitive systems,
I use the common approach used by artificial intelligence and artificial life:
Instead of studying the substrate of systems, let us focus on their
organization. This organization can be measured with information. Thus, I apply
an informationist epistemology to describe cognitive systems, including brains
and computers. This allows me to frame the usefulness and limitations of the
brain-computer analogy in different contexts. I also use this perspective to
discuss the evolution and ecology of intelligence.
Related papers
- Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition [78.76893632793497]
We argue that shortcomings stem from one overarching failure: AI systems lack wisdom.
While AI research has focused on task-level strategies, metacognition is underdeveloped in AI systems.
We propose that integrating metacognitive capabilities into AI systems is crucial for enhancing their robustness, explainability, cooperation, and safety.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T18:10:10Z) - AI-as-exploration: Navigating intelligence space [0.05657375260432172]
I articulate the contours of a rather neglected but central scientific role that AI has to play.
The basic thrust of AI-as-exploration is that of creating and studying systems that can reveal candidate building blocks of intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-15T21:06:20Z) - On a Functional Definition of Intelligence [0.0]
Without an agreed-upon definition of intelligence, asking "is this system intelligent?"" is an untestable question.
Most work on precisely capturing what we mean by "intelligence" has come from the fields of philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science.
We present an argument for a purely functional, black-box definition of intelligence, distinct from how that intelligence is actually achieved.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-15T05:46:49Z) - AI for Mathematics: A Cognitive Science Perspective [86.02346372284292]
Mathematics is one of the most powerful conceptual systems developed and used by the human species.
Rapid progress in AI, particularly propelled by advances in large language models (LLMs), has sparked renewed, widespread interest in building such systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-19T02:00:31Z) - A Theory of Intelligences [0.0]
I develop a framework that applies across all systems from physics, to biology, humans and AI.
I present general equations for intelligence and its components, and a simple expression for the evolution of intelligence traits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T20:18:43Z) - Language Cognition and Language Computation -- Human and Machine
Language Understanding [51.56546543716759]
Language understanding is a key scientific issue in the fields of cognitive and computer science.
Can a combination of the disciplines offer new insights for building intelligent language models?
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-12T02:37:00Z) - On the Philosophical, Cognitive and Mathematical Foundations of
Symbiotic Autonomous Systems (SAS) [87.3520234553785]
Symbiotic Autonomous Systems (SAS) are advanced intelligent and cognitive systems exhibiting autonomous collective intelligence.
This work presents a theoretical framework of SAS underpinned by the latest advances in intelligence, cognition, computer, and system sciences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-02-11T05:44:25Z) - Inductive Biases for Deep Learning of Higher-Level Cognition [108.89281493851358]
A fascinating hypothesis is that human and animal intelligence could be explained by a few principles.
This work considers a larger list, focusing on those which concern mostly higher-level and sequential conscious processing.
The objective of clarifying these particular principles is that they could potentially help us build AI systems benefiting from humans' abilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-30T18:29:25Z) - Naive Artificial Intelligence [0.8594140167290096]
fluid intelligence is the ability to solve novel problems without relying on prior knowledge.
Previous studies have shown that deep networks can solve some forms of intelligence tests, but only after extensive training.
Here we present a computational model that solves intelligence tests without any prior training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-04T13:40:10Z) - Future Trends for Human-AI Collaboration: A Comprehensive Taxonomy of
AI/AGI Using Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles [95.58955174499371]
We describe various aspects of multiple human intelligences and learning styles, which may impact on a variety of AI problem domains.
Future AI systems will be able not only to communicate with human users and each other, but also to efficiently exchange knowledge and wisdom.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-07T21:00:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.