Image Based Artificial Intelligence in Wound Assessment: A Systematic
Review
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.07141v1
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 14:52:14 GMT
- Title: Image Based Artificial Intelligence in Wound Assessment: A Systematic
Review
- Authors: D. M. Anisuzzaman (1), Chuanbo Wang (1), Behrouz Rostami (2), Sandeep
Gopalakrishnan (3), Jeffrey Niezgoda (4), and Zeyun Yu (1) ((1) Department of
Computer Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA, (2)
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,
Milwaukee, WI, USA, (3) College of Nursing, University of
Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA, (4) Jeffrey Niezgoda is with the AZH
Wound Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA.)
- Abstract summary: Assessment of acute and chronic wounds can help wound care teams improve diagnosis, optimize treatment plans, ease the workload and achieve health-related quality of life to the patient population.
While artificial intelligence has found wide applications in health-related sciences and technology, AI-based systems remain to be developed clinically and computationally for high-quality wound care.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Efficient and effective assessment of acute and chronic wounds can help wound
care teams in clinical practice to greatly improve wound diagnosis, optimize
treatment plans, ease the workload and achieve health related quality of life
to the patient population. While artificial intelligence (AI) has found wide
applications in health-related sciences and technology, AI-based systems remain
to be developed clinically and computationally for high-quality wound care. To
this end, we have carried out a systematic review of intelligent image-based
data analysis and system developments for wound assessment. Specifically, we
provide an extensive review of research methods on wound measurement
(segmentation) and wound diagnosis (classification). We also reviewed recent
work on wound assessment systems (including hardware, software, and mobile
apps). More than 250 articles were retrieved from various publication databases
and online resources, and 115 of them were carefully selected to cover the
breadth and depth of most recent and relevant work to convey the current review
to its fulfillment.
Related papers
- Clinical Evaluation of Medical Image Synthesis: A Case Study in Wireless Capsule Endoscopy [63.39037092484374]
This study focuses on the clinical evaluation of medical Synthetic Data Generation using Artificial Intelligence (AI) models.
The paper contributes by a) presenting a protocol for the systematic evaluation of synthetic images by medical experts and b) applying it to assess TIDE-II, a novel variational autoencoder-based model for high-resolution WCE image synthesis.
The results show that TIDE-II generates clinically relevant WCE images, helping to address data scarcity and enhance diagnostic tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-31T19:48:50Z) - Question answering systems for health professionals at the point of care
-- a systematic review [2.446313557261822]
Question answering (QA) systems have the potential to improve the quality of clinical care by providing health professionals with the latest and most relevant evidence.
This systematic review aims to characterize current medical QA systems, assess their suitability for healthcare, and identify areas of improvement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-24T13:47:39Z) - Validating polyp and instrument segmentation methods in colonoscopy through Medico 2020 and MedAI 2021 Challenges [58.32937972322058]
"Medico automatic polyp segmentation (Medico 2020)" and "MedAI: Transparency in Medical Image (MedAI 2021)" competitions.
We present a comprehensive summary and analyze each contribution, highlight the strength of the best-performing methods, and discuss the possibility of clinical translations of such methods into the clinic.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-30T16:08:45Z) - Medical Pathologies Prediction : Systematic Review and Proposed Approach [0.0]
We have analyzed and examined different works concerning the exploitation of the most recent technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning for the improvement of health care.
We propose our general approach concentrating on the collection, preprocessing and clustering of medical data to facilitate access, after analysis, to the patients and health professionals to predict the most frequent pathologies with better precision within a notable timeframe.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-01T13:35:17Z) - Survey on Adversarial Attack and Defense for Medical Image Analysis: Methods and Challenges [64.63744409431001]
We present a comprehensive survey on advances in adversarial attacks and defenses for medical image analysis.
For a fair comparison, we establish a new benchmark for adversarially robust medical diagnosis models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-24T16:38:58Z) - Explainable AI for clinical and remote health applications: a survey on
tabular and time series data [3.655021726150368]
It is worth noting that XAI has not gathered the same attention across different research areas and data types, especially in healthcare.
This paper provides a review of the literature in the last 5 years, illustrating the type of generated explanations and the efforts provided to evaluate their relevance and quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-14T10:01:29Z) - Robust and Efficient Medical Imaging with Self-Supervision [80.62711706785834]
We present REMEDIS, a unified representation learning strategy to improve robustness and data-efficiency of medical imaging AI.
We study a diverse range of medical imaging tasks and simulate three realistic application scenarios using retrospective data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-19T17:34:18Z) - What is the State of the Art of Computer Vision-Assisted Cytology? A
Systematic Literature Review [47.42354724922676]
We conducted a Systematic Literature Review to identify the state-of-art of computer vision techniques currently applied to cytology.
The most used methods in the analyzed works are deep learning-based (70 papers), while fewer works employ classic computer vision only (101 papers)
We conclude that there still is a lack of high-quality datasets for many types of stains and most of the works are not mature enough to be applied in a daily clinical diagnostic routine.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-24T13:50:45Z) - Detecting Spurious Correlations with Sanity Tests for Artificial
Intelligence Guided Radiology Systems [22.249702822013045]
A critical component to deploying AI in radiology is to gain confidence in a developed system's efficacy and safety.
The current gold standard approach is to conduct an analytical validation of performance on a generalization dataset.
We describe a series of sanity tests to identify when a system performs well on development data for the wrong reasons.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-04T14:14:05Z) - A Modern Non-SQL Approach to Radiology-Centric Search Engine Design with
Clinical Validation [0.0]
We present a de novo process of developing a document-based, secure, efficient, and accurate search engine in the context of Radiology.
By leveraging efficient database architecture, search capability, and clinical thinking, radiologists are at the forefront of harnessing the power of healthcare data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-04T15:21:49Z) - A Review of Computational Approaches for Evaluation of Rehabilitation
Exercises [58.720142291102135]
This paper reviews computational approaches for evaluating patient performance in rehabilitation programs using motion capture systems.
The reviewed computational methods for exercise evaluation are grouped into three main categories: discrete movement score, rule-based, and template-based approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-29T22:18:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.