Adoption of Twitter's New Length Limit: Is 280 the New 140?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.07661v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:01:05 GMT
• Title: Adoption of Twitter's New Length Limit: Is 280 the New 140?
• Authors: Kristina Gligori\'c, Ashton Anderson, Robert West
• Abstract summary: In November 2017, Twitter doubled the maximum allowed tweet length from 140 to 280 characters. We analyze Twitter's publicly available 1% sample over a period of around 3 years. We find that, when the length limit was raised from 140 to 280 characters, the prevalence of tweets around 140 characters dropped immediately. Despite this rise, tweets approaching the length limit have been far less frequent after than before the switch.
• Score: 20.146636010105926
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In November 2017, Twitter doubled the maximum allowed tweet length from 140 to 280 characters, a drastic switch on one of the world's most influential social media platforms. In the first long-term study of how the new length limit was adopted by Twitter users, we ask: Does the effect of the new length limit resemble that of the old one? Or did the doubling of the limit fundamentally change how Twitter is shaped by the limited length of posted content? By analyzing Twitter's publicly available 1% sample over a period of around 3 years, we find that, when the length limit was raised from 140 to 280 characters, the prevalence of tweets around 140 characters dropped immediately, while the prevalence of tweets around 280 characters rose steadily for about 6 months. Despite this rise, tweets approaching the length limit have been far less frequent after than before the switch. We find widely different adoption rates across languages and client-device types. The prevalence of tweets around 140 characters before the switch in a given language is strongly correlated with the prevalence of tweets around 280 characters after the switch in the same language, and very long tweets are vastly more popular on Web clients than on mobile clients. Moreover, tweets of around 280 characters after the switch are syntactically and semantically similar to tweets of around 140 characters before the switch, manifesting patterns of message squeezing in both cases. Taken together, these findings suggest that the new 280-character limit constitutes a new, less intrusive version of the old 140-character limit. The length limit remains an important factor that should be considered in all studies using Twitter data.

Related papers

• Russo-Ukrainian War: Prediction and explanation of Twitter suspension [47.61306219245444]
  This study focuses on the Twitter suspension mechanism and the analysis of shared content and features of user accounts that may lead to this. We have obtained a dataset containing 107.7M tweets, originating from 9.8 million users, using Twitter API. Our results reveal scam campaigns taking advantage of trending topics regarding the Russia-Ukrainian conflict for Bitcoin fraud, spam, and advertisement campaigns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T08:41:02Z)
• Anticipated versus Actual Effects of Platform Design Change: A Case Study of Twitter's Character Limit [17.925651625409678]
  We study Twitter's decision to double the character limit from 140 to 280 characters to soothe users' need to ''cram'' or ''squeeze'' their tweets. We find that even though users do not ''cram'' as much under 280 characters as they used to under 140 characters, emergent cramming'' at the new limit seems to not have been taken into account when designing the platform change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-30T16:59:19Z)
• An Exploratory Study of Tweets about the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant: Insights from Sentiment Analysis, Language Interpretation, Source Tracking, Type Classification, and Embedded URL Detection [0.0]
  This paper presents the findings of an exploratory study on the continuously generating Big Data on Twitter related to the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 12028 tweets about the Omicron variant were studied, and the specific characteristics of tweets that were analyzed include - sentiment, language, source, type, and embedded URLs. To support similar research in this field, we have developed a Twitter dataset that comprises more than 500,000 tweets about the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant since the first detected case of this variant on November 24, 2021.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T18:47:20Z)
• Tweet Emotion Dynamics: Emotion Word Usage in Tweets from US and Canada [34.41140246464486]
  We introduce a massive dataset of more than 45 million geo-located tweets posted between 2015 and 2021 from US and Canada. We also introduce Tweet Emotion Dynamics (TED) -- metrics to capture patterns of emotions associated with tweets over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T04:39:39Z)
• Manipulating Twitter Through Deletions [64.33261764633504]
  Research into influence campaigns on Twitter has mostly relied on identifying malicious activities from tweets obtained via public APIs. Here, we provide the first exhaustive, large-scale analysis of anomalous deletion patterns involving more than a billion deletions by over 11 million accounts. We find that a small fraction of accounts delete a large number of tweets daily. First, limits on tweet volume are circumvented, allowing certain accounts to flood the network with over 26 thousand daily tweets. Second, coordinated networks of accounts engage in repetitive likes and unlikes of content that is eventually deleted, which can manipulate ranking algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T20:07:08Z)
• Retweet communities reveal the main sources of hate speech [0.6999740786886536]
  We deploy advanced deep learning to produce high quality hate speech classification models. We create retweet networks, detect communities and monitor their evolution through time. Hate speech is dominated by offensive tweets, related to political and ideological issues. About 60% of unacceptable tweets are produced by a single right-wing community of only moderate size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-31T11:43:19Z)
• High-level Approaches to Detect Malicious Political Activity on Twitter [0.0]
  We investigate a data snapshot taken on May 2020, with around 5 million accounts and over 120 million tweets. The analyzed time period stretches from August 2019 to May 2020, with a focus on the Portuguese elections of October 6th, 2019. We learn that Twitter's suspension patterns are not adequate to the type of political trolling found in the Portuguese Twittersphere.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-04T22:54:44Z)
• Understanding the Hoarding Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic using Large Scale Social Media Data [77.34726150561087]
  We analyze the hoarding and anti-hoarding patterns of over 42,000 unique Twitter users in the United States from March 1 to April 30, 2020. We find the percentage of females in both hoarding and anti-hoarding groups is higher than that of the general Twitter user population. The LIWC anxiety mean for the hoarding-related tweets is significantly higher than the baseline Twitter anxiety mean.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T16:02:25Z)
• Writer Identification Using Microblogging Texts for Social Media Forensics [53.180678723280145]
  We evaluate popular stylometric features, widely used in literary analysis, and specific Twitter features like URLs, hashtags, replies or quotes. We test varying sized author sets and varying amounts of training/test texts per author.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-31T00:23:18Z)
• Privacy-Aware Recommender Systems Challenge on Twitter's Home Timeline [47.434392695347924]
  RecSys 2020 Challenge organized by ACM RecSys in partnership with Twitter using this dataset. This paper touches on the key challenges faced by researchers and professionals striving to predict user engagements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T23:54:33Z)
• Forensic Authorship Analysis of Microblogging Texts Using N-Grams and Stylometric Features [63.48764893706088]
  This work aims at identifying authors of tweet messages, which are limited to 280 characters. We use for our experiments a self-captured database of 40 users, with 120 to 200 tweets per user. Results using this small set are promising, with the different features providing a classification accuracy between 92% and 98.5%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-24T19:32:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.