High-level Approaches to Detect Malicious Political Activity on Twitter

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.04293v1
• Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 22:54:44 GMT
• Title: High-level Approaches to Detect Malicious Political Activity on Twitter
• Authors: Miguel Sozinho Ramalho
• Abstract summary: We investigate a data snapshot taken on May 2020, with around 5 million accounts and over 120 million tweets. The analyzed time period stretches from August 2019 to May 2020, with a focus on the Portuguese elections of October 6th, 2019. We learn that Twitter's suspension patterns are not adequate to the type of political trolling found in the Portuguese Twittersphere.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Our work represents another step into the detection and prevention of these ever-more present political manipulation efforts. We, therefore, start by focusing on understanding what the state-of-the-art approaches lack -- since the problem remains, this is a fair assumption. We find concerning issues within the current literature and follow a diverging path. Notably, by placing emphasis on using data features that are less susceptible to malicious manipulation and also on looking for high-level approaches that avoid a granularity level that is biased towards easy-to-spot and low impact cases. We designed and implemented a framework -- Twitter Watch -- that performs structured Twitter data collection, applying it to the Portuguese Twittersphere. We investigate a data snapshot taken on May 2020, with around 5 million accounts and over 120 million tweets (this value has since increased to over 175 million). The analyzed time period stretches from August 2019 to May 2020, with a focus on the Portuguese elections of October 6th, 2019. However, the Covid-19 pandemic showed itself in our data, and we also delve into how it affected typical Twitter behavior. We performed three main approaches: content-oriented, metadata-oriented, and network interaction-oriented. We learn that Twitter's suspension patterns are not adequate to the type of political trolling found in the Portuguese Twittersphere -- identified by this work and by an independent peer - nor to fake news posting accounts. We also surmised that the different types of malicious accounts we independently gathered are very similar both in terms of content and interaction, through two distinct analysis, and are simultaneously very distinct from regular accounts.

Related papers

• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Russo-Ukrainian War: Prediction and explanation of Twitter suspension [47.61306219245444]
  This study focuses on the Twitter suspension mechanism and the analysis of shared content and features of user accounts that may lead to this. We have obtained a dataset containing 107.7M tweets, originating from 9.8 million users, using Twitter API. Our results reveal scam campaigns taking advantage of trending topics regarding the Russia-Ukrainian conflict for Bitcoin fraud, spam, and advertisement campaigns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T08:41:02Z)
• Design and analysis of tweet-based election models for the 2021 Mexican legislative election [55.41644538483948]
  We use a dataset of 15 million election-related tweets in the six months preceding election day. We find that models using data with geographical attributes determine the results of the election with better precision and accuracy than conventional polling methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-02T12:40:05Z)
• Twitter's Agenda-Setting Role: A Study of Twitter Strategy for Political Diversion [2.129609835555137]
  This study verified the effectiveness of Donald Trump's Twitter campaign in guiding agen-da-setting and deflecting political risk. We collected all tweets posted by Trump on the Twitter platform from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Empirical analysis revealed Twitter's strategy is used to divert public attention from negative Covid-19 reports during the epidemic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-16T11:34:49Z)
• How Many Tweets DoWe Need?: Efficient Mining of Short-Term Polarized Topics on Twitter: A Case Study From Japan [0.0]
  We develop a method to identify polarized topics on Twitter in a short-term period, namely 12 hours. We also develop a prediction method using machine learning techniques to estimate the polarization level using randomly collected tweets. Our work is the first to predict the polarization level of the topics with low-resource tweets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-29T15:41:30Z)
• Predicting Hate Intensity of Twitter Conversation Threads [26.190359413890537]
  We propose DRAGNET++, which aims to predict the intensity of hatred that a tweet can bring in through its reply chain in the future. It uses the semantic and propagating structure of the tweet threads to maximize the contextual information leading up to and the fall of hate intensity at each subsequent tweet. We show that DRAGNET++ outperforms all the state-of-the-art baselines significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-16T18:51:36Z)
• Tweets2Stance: Users stance detection exploiting Zero-Shot Learning Algorithms on Tweets [0.06372261626436675]
  The aim of the study is to predict the stance of a Party p in regard to each statement s exploiting what the Twitter Party account wrote on Twitter. Results obtained from multiple experiments show that Tweets2Stance can correctly predict the stance with a general minimum MAE of 1.13, which is a great achievement considering the task complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T14:00:11Z)
• Manipulating Twitter Through Deletions [64.33261764633504]
  Research into influence campaigns on Twitter has mostly relied on identifying malicious activities from tweets obtained via public APIs. Here, we provide the first exhaustive, large-scale analysis of anomalous deletion patterns involving more than a billion deletions by over 11 million accounts. We find that a small fraction of accounts delete a large number of tweets daily. First, limits on tweet volume are circumvented, allowing certain accounts to flood the network with over 26 thousand daily tweets. Second, coordinated networks of accounts engage in repetitive likes and unlikes of content that is eventually deleted, which can manipulate ranking algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-25T20:07:08Z)
• A deep dive into the consistently toxic 1% of Twitter [9.669275987983447]
  This study spans 14 years of tweets from 122K Twitter profiles and more than 293M tweets. We selected the most extreme profiles in terms of consistency of toxic content and examined their tweet texts, and the domains, hashtags, and URLs they shared. We found that these selected profiles keep to a narrow theme with lower diversity in hashtags, URLs, and domains, they are thematically similar to each other, and have a high likelihood of bot-like behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-16T04:21:48Z)
• Identification of Twitter Bots based on an Explainable ML Framework: the US 2020 Elections Case Study [72.61531092316092]
  This paper focuses on the design of a novel system for identifying Twitter bots based on labeled Twitter data. Supervised machine learning (ML) framework is adopted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. Our study also deploys Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) for explaining the ML model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T14:12:24Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.