Anticipated versus Actual Effects of Platform Design Change: A Case
Study of Twitter's Character Limit
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.14392v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 16:59:19 GMT
- Title: Anticipated versus Actual Effects of Platform Design Change: A Case
Study of Twitter's Character Limit
- Authors: Kristina Gligori\'c and Justyna Cz\k{e}stochowska and Ashton Anderson
and Robert West
- Abstract summary: We study Twitter's decision to double the character limit from 140 to 280 characters to soothe users' need to ''cram'' or ''squeeze'' their tweets.
We find that even though users do not ''cram'' as much under 280 characters as they used to under 140 characters, emergent cramming'' at the new limit seems to not have been taken into account when designing the platform change.
- Score: 17.925651625409678
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The design of online platforms is both critically important and challenging,
as any changes may lead to unintended consequences, and it can be hard to
predict how users will react. Here we conduct a case study of a particularly
important real-world platform design change: Twitter's decision to double the
character limit from 140 to 280 characters to soothe users' need to ''cram'' or
''squeeze'' their tweets, informed by modeling of historical user behavior. In
our analysis, we contrast Twitter's anticipated pre-intervention predictions
about user behavior with actual post-intervention user behavior: Did the
platform design change lead to the intended user behavior shifts, or did a gap
between anticipated and actual behavior emerge? Did different user groups react
differently? We find that even though users do not ''cram'' as much under 280
characters as they used to under 140 characters, emergent ``cramming'' at the
new limit seems to not have been taken into account when designing the platform
change. Furthermore, investigating textual features, we find that, although
post-intervention ''crammed'' tweets are longer, their syntactic and semantic
characteristics remain similar and indicative of ''squeezing''. Applying the
same approach as Twitter policy-makers, we create updated counterfactual
estimates and find that the character limit would need to be increased further
to reduce cramming that re-emerged at the new limit. We contribute to the rich
literature studying online user behavior with an empirical study that reveals a
dynamic interaction between platform design and user behavior, with immediate
policy and practical implications for the design of socio-technical systems.
Related papers
- Beyond Trial-and-Error: Predicting User Abandonment After a Moderation Intervention [0.6918368994425961]
We propose and tackle the novel task of predicting the effect of a moderation intervention on Reddit.
We use a dataset of 13.8M posts to compute a set of 142 features, which convey information about the activity, toxicity, relations, and writing style of the users.
Our results demonstrate the feasibility of predicting the effects of a moderation intervention, paving the way for a new research direction in predictive content moderation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-23T08:52:41Z) - Decoding the Silent Majority: Inducing Belief Augmented Social Graph
with Large Language Model for Response Forecasting [74.68371461260946]
SocialSense is a framework that induces a belief-centered graph on top of an existent social network, along with graph-based propagation to capture social dynamics.
Our method surpasses existing state-of-the-art in experimental evaluations for both zero-shot and supervised settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T06:17:02Z) - Understanding writing style in social media with a supervised
contrastively pre-trained transformer [57.48690310135374]
Online Social Networks serve as fertile ground for harmful behavior, ranging from hate speech to the dissemination of disinformation.
We introduce the Style Transformer for Authorship Representations (STAR), trained on a large corpus derived from public sources of 4.5 x 106 authored texts.
Using a support base of 8 documents of 512 tokens, we can discern authors from sets of up to 1616 authors with at least 80% accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-17T09:01:17Z) - PinnerFormer: Sequence Modeling for User Representation at Pinterest [60.335384724891746]
We introduce PinnerFormer, a user representation trained to predict a user's future long-term engagement.
Unlike prior approaches, we adapt our modeling to a batch infrastructure via our new dense all-action loss.
We show that by doing so, we significantly close the gap between batch user embeddings that are generated once a day and realtime user embeddings generated whenever a user takes an action.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-09T18:26:51Z) - The Challenge of Understanding What Users Want: Inconsistent Preferences
and Engagement Optimization [2.690930520747925]
We develop a model of media consumption where users have inconsistent preferences.
We show how our model of users' preference inconsistencies produces phenomena that are familiar from everyday experience.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-23T20:45:31Z) - A deep dive into the consistently toxic 1% of Twitter [9.669275987983447]
This study spans 14 years of tweets from 122K Twitter profiles and more than 293M tweets.
We selected the most extreme profiles in terms of consistency of toxic content and examined their tweet texts, and the domains, hashtags, and URLs they shared.
We found that these selected profiles keep to a narrow theme with lower diversity in hashtags, URLs, and domains, they are thematically similar to each other, and have a high likelihood of bot-like behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-16T04:21:48Z) - Identification of Twitter Bots based on an Explainable ML Framework: the
US 2020 Elections Case Study [72.61531092316092]
This paper focuses on the design of a novel system for identifying Twitter bots based on labeled Twitter data.
Supervised machine learning (ML) framework is adopted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm.
Our study also deploys Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) for explaining the ML model predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-08T14:12:24Z) - Analyzing Behavioral Changes of Twitter Users After Exposure to
Misinformation [1.8251012479962594]
We aim to understand whether general Twitter users changed their behavior after being exposed to misinformation.
We compare the before and after behavior of exposed users to determine whether the frequency of the tweets they posted underwent any significant change.
We also study the characteristics of two specific user groups, multi-exposure and extreme change groups, which were potentially highly impacted.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-01T04:48:07Z) - News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation.
Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content.
The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z) - Adoption of Twitter's New Length Limit: Is 280 the New 140? [20.146636010105926]
In November 2017, Twitter doubled the maximum allowed tweet length from 140 to 280 characters.
We analyze Twitter's publicly available 1% sample over a period of around 3 years.
We find that, when the length limit was raised from 140 to 280 characters, the prevalence of tweets around 140 characters dropped immediately.
Despite this rise, tweets approaching the length limit have been far less frequent after than before the switch.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-16T13:01:05Z) - Privacy-Aware Recommender Systems Challenge on Twitter's Home Timeline [47.434392695347924]
RecSys 2020 Challenge organized by ACM RecSys in partnership with Twitter using this dataset.
This paper touches on the key challenges faced by researchers and professionals striving to predict user engagements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-28T23:54:33Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.