How-to Present News on Social Media: A Causal Analysis of Editing News Headlines for Boosting User Engagement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.08100v2
• Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 01:52:10 GMT
• Title: How-to Present News on Social Media: A Causal Analysis of Editing News Headlines for Boosting User Engagement
• Authors: Kunwoo Park, Haewoon Kwak, Jisun An, and Sanjay Chawla
• Abstract summary: We analyze media outlets' current practices using a data-driven approach. We build a parallel corpus of original news articles and their corresponding tweets that eight media outlets shared. Then, we explore how those media edited tweets against original headlines and the effects of such changes.
• Score: 14.829079057399838
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: To reach a broader audience and optimize traffic toward news articles, media outlets commonly run social media accounts and share their content with a short text summary. Despite its importance of writing a compelling message in sharing articles, the research community does not own a sufficient understanding of what kinds of editing strategies effectively promote audience engagement. In this study, we aim to fill the gap by analyzing media outlets' current practices using a data-driven approach. We first build a parallel corpus of original news articles and their corresponding tweets that eight media outlets shared. Then, we explore how those media edited tweets against original headlines and the effects of such changes. To estimate the effects of editing news headlines for social media sharing in audience engagement, we present a systematic analysis that incorporates a causal inference technique with deep learning; using propensity score matching, it allows for estimating potential (dis-)advantages of an editing style compared to counterfactual cases where a similar news article is shared with a different style. According to the analyses of various editing styles, we report common and differing effects of the styles across the outlets. To understand the effects of various editing styles, media outlets could apply our easy-to-use tool by themselves.

Related papers

• The News Comment Gap and Algorithmic Agenda Setting in Online Forums [0.0]
  We analyse 1.2 million comments from Austrian newspaper Der Standard to understand the "News Comment Gap" and the effects of different ranking algorithms. We find that journalists prefer positive, timely, complex, direct responses, while readers favour comments similar to article content from elite authors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T17:43:32Z)
• ManiTweet: A New Benchmark for Identifying Manipulation of News on Social Media [74.93847489218008]
  We present a novel task, identifying manipulation of news on social media, which aims to detect manipulation in social media posts and identify manipulated or inserted information. To study this task, we have proposed a data collection schema and curated a dataset called ManiTweet, consisting of 3.6K pairs of tweets and corresponding articles. Our analysis demonstrates that this task is highly challenging, with large language models (LLMs) yielding unsatisfactory performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:40:07Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• GREENER: Graph Neural Networks for News Media Profiling [24.675574340841163]
  We study the problem of profiling news media on the Web with respect to their factuality of reporting and bias. Our main focus is on modeling the similarity between media outlets based on the overlap of their audience. Prediction accuracy is found to improve by 2.5-27 macro-F1 points for the two tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T12:46:29Z)
• Visual Persuasion in COVID-19 Social Media Content: A Multi-Modal Characterization [30.710295617831015]
  This work proposes a computational approach to analyze the outcome of persuasive information in multi-modal content. It focuses on two aspects, popularity and reliability, in COVID-19-related news articles shared on Twitter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-05T02:15:01Z)
• Newsalyze: Effective Communication of Person-Targeting Biases in News Articles [8.586057042714698]
  We present a system for bias identification, which combines state-of-the-art methods from natural language understanding. Second, we devise bias-sensitive visualizations to communicate bias in news articles to non-expert news consumers. Third, our main contribution is a large-scale user study that measures bias-awareness in a setting that approximates daily news consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T10:23:19Z)
• How to Effectively Identify and Communicate Person-Targeting Media Bias in Daily News Consumption? [8.586057042714698]
  We present an in-progress system for news recommendation that is the first to automate the manual procedure of content analysis. Our recommender detects and reveals substantial frames that are actually present in individual news articles. Our study shows that recommending news articles that differently frame an event significantly improves respondents' awareness of bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T10:13:23Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Cross-Domain Learning for Classifying Propaganda in Online Contents [67.10699378370752]
  We present an approach to leverage cross-domain learning, based on labeled documents and sentences from news and tweets, as well as political speeches with a clear difference in their degrees of being propagandistic. Our experiments demonstrate the usefulness of this approach, and identify difficulties and limitations in various configurations of sources and targets for the transfer step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:19:13Z)
• Content-based Analysis of the Cultural Differences between TikTok and Douyin [95.32409577885645]
  Short-form video social media shifts away from the traditional media paradigm by telling the audience a dynamic story to attract their attention. In particular, different combinations of everyday objects can be employed to represent a unique scene that is both interesting and understandable. Offered by the same company, TikTok and Douyin are popular examples of such new media that has become popular in recent years. The hypothesis that they express cultural differences together with media fashion and social idiosyncrasy is the primary target of our research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T01:47:49Z)
• Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
  We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news. In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities. We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.