Related papers: The News Comment Gap and Algorithmic Agenda Setting in Online Forums

The News Comment Gap and Algorithmic Agenda Setting in Online Forums

URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.07052v2
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 09:29:34 GMT
Title: The News Comment Gap and Algorithmic Agenda Setting in Online Forums
Authors: Flora Böwing, Patrick Gildersleve,
Abstract summary: We analyse 1.2 million comments from Austrian newspaper Der Standard to understand the "News Comment Gap" and the effects of different ranking algorithms. We find that journalists prefer positive, timely, complex, direct responses, while readers favour comments similar to article content from elite authors.
Score: 0.0
License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract: The disparity between news stories valued by journalists and those preferred by readers, known as the "News Gap", is well-documented. However, the difference in expectations regarding news related user-generated content is less studied. Comment sections, hosted by news websites, are popular venues for reader engagement, yet still subject to editorial decisions. It is thus important to understand journalist vs reader comment preferences and how these are served by various comment ranking algorithms that represent discussions differently. We analyse 1.2 million comments from Austrian newspaper Der Standard to understand the "News Comment Gap" and the effects of different ranking algorithms. We find that journalists prefer positive, timely, complex, direct responses, while readers favour comments similar to article content from elite authors. We introduce the versatile Feature-Oriented Ranking Utility Metric (FORUM) to assess the impact of different ranking algorithms and find dramatic differences in how they prioritise the display of comments by sentiment, topical relevance, lexical diversity, and readability. Journalists can exert substantial influence over the discourse through both curatorial and algorithmic means. Understanding these choices' implications is vital in fostering engaging and civil discussions while aligning with journalistic objectives, especially given the increasing legal scrutiny and societal importance of online discourse.

Related papers

Tracking the Newsworthiness of Public Documents [107.12303391111014]
This work focuses on news coverage of local public policy in the San Francisco Bay Area by the San Francisco Chronicle. First, we gather news articles, public policy documents and meeting recordings and link them using probabilistic relational modeling. Second, we define a new task: newsworthiness prediction, to predict if a policy item will get covered.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T10:05:26Z)
Multilingual Coarse Political Stance Classification of Media. The Editorial Line of a ChatGPT and Bard Newspaper [1.450405446885067]
We use ratings of authentic news outlets to create a multilingual corpus of news with coarse stance annotations. We show that classifiers trained on this data are able to identify the editorial line of most unseen newspapers in English, German, Spanish and Catalan. We observe that, similarly to traditional newspapers, ChatGPT editorial line evolves with time and, being a data-driven system, the stance of the generated articles differs among languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-25T01:01:28Z)
You talk what you read: Understanding News Comment Behavior by Dispositional and Situational Attribution [20.279995723061568]
A three-part encoder-decoder framework is proposed to model the generative process of news comment. The resultant dispositional and situational attribution contributes to understanding user focus and opinions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-04T07:10:15Z)
Towards Corpus-Scale Discovery of Selection Biases in News Coverage: Comparing What Sources Say About Entities as a Start [65.28355014154549]
This paper investigates the challenges of building scalable NLP systems for discovering patterns of media selection biases directly from news content in massive-scale news corpora. We show the capabilities of the framework through a case study on NELA-2020, a corpus of 1.8M news articles in English from 519 news sources worldwide.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-06T23:36:45Z)
Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
Newsalyze: Effective Communication of Person-Targeting Biases in News Articles [8.586057042714698]
We present a system for bias identification, which combines state-of-the-art methods from natural language understanding. Second, we devise bias-sensitive visualizations to communicate bias in news articles to non-expert news consumers. Third, our main contribution is a large-scale user study that measures bias-awareness in a setting that approximates daily news consumption.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-18T10:23:19Z)
How to Effectively Identify and Communicate Person-Targeting Media Bias in Daily News Consumption? [8.586057042714698]
We present an in-progress system for news recommendation that is the first to automate the manual procedure of content analysis. Our recommender detects and reveals substantial frames that are actually present in individual news articles. Our study shows that recommending news articles that differently frame an event significantly improves respondents' awareness of bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-18T10:13:23Z)
News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
How-to Present News on Social Media: A Causal Analysis of Editing News Headlines for Boosting User Engagement [14.829079057399838]
We analyze media outlets' current practices using a data-driven approach. We build a parallel corpus of original news articles and their corresponding tweets that eight media outlets shared. Then, we explore how those media edited tweets against original headlines and the effects of such changes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-17T06:39:49Z)
Political audience diversity and news reliability in algorithmic ranking [54.23273310155137]
We propose using the political diversity of a website's audience as a quality signal. Using news source reliability ratings from domain experts and web browsing data from a diverse sample of 6,890 U.S. citizens, we first show that websites with more extreme and less politically diverse audiences have lower journalistic standards.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-16T02:13:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.