Probably Approximately Correct Explanations of Machine Learning Models via Syntax-Guided Synthesis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.08770v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:10:49 GMT
• Title: Probably Approximately Correct Explanations of Machine Learning Models via Syntax-Guided Synthesis
• Authors: Daniel Neider and Bishwamittra Ghosh
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel approach to understanding the decision making of complex machine learning models (e.g., deep neural networks) using a combination of probably approximately correct learning (PAC) and a logic inference methodology called syntax-guided synthesis (SyGuS) We prove that our framework produces explanations that with a high probability make only few errors and show empirically that it is effective in generating small, human-interpretable explanations.
• Score: 6.624726878647541
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We propose a novel approach to understanding the decision making of complex machine learning models (e.g., deep neural networks) using a combination of probably approximately correct learning (PAC) and a logic inference methodology called syntax-guided synthesis (SyGuS). We prove that our framework produces explanations that with a high probability make only few errors and show empirically that it is effective in generating small, human-interpretable explanations.

Related papers

• Reasoning with trees: interpreting CNNs using hierarchies [3.6763102409647526]
  We introduce a framework that uses hierarchical segmentation techniques for faithful and interpretable explanations of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) Our method constructs model-based hierarchical segmentations that maintain the model's reasoning fidelity. Experiments show that our framework, xAiTrees, delivers highly interpretable and faithful model explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T06:45:19Z)
• Explaining Text Similarity in Transformer Models [52.571158418102584]
  Recent advances in explainable AI have made it possible to mitigate limitations by leveraging improved explanations for Transformers. We use BiLRP, an extension developed for computing second-order explanations in bilinear similarity models, to investigate which feature interactions drive similarity in NLP models. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of different semantic similarity tasks and models, highlighting how novel explainable AI methods enable in-depth analyses and corpus-level insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:11:31Z)
• Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing. This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
• Learning with Explanation Constraints [91.23736536228485]
  We provide a learning theoretic framework to analyze how explanations can improve the learning of our models. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach over a large array of synthetic and real-world experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T15:06:47Z)
• Understanding Post-hoc Explainers: The Case of Anchors [6.681943980068051]
  We present a theoretical analysis of a rule-based interpretability method that highlights a small set of words to explain a text's decision. After formalizing its algorithm and providing useful insights, we demonstrate mathematically that Anchors produces meaningful results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T17:56:34Z)
• Explanations from Large Language Models Make Small Reasoners Better [61.991772773700006]
  We show that our method can consistently and significantly outperform finetuning baselines across different settings. As a side benefit, human evaluation shows that our method can generate high-quality explanations to justify its predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-13T04:50:02Z)
• Learning outside the Black-Box: The pursuit of interpretable models [78.32475359554395]
  This paper proposes an algorithm that produces a continuous global interpretation of any given continuous black-box function. Our interpretation represents a leap forward from the previous state of the art.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-17T12:39:44Z)
• Towards Analogy-Based Explanations in Machine Learning [3.1410342959104725]
  We argue that analogical reasoning is not less interesting from an interpretability and explainability point of view. An analogy-based approach is a viable alternative to existing approaches in the realm of explainable AI and interpretable machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-23T06:41:35Z)
• Ontology-based Interpretable Machine Learning for Textual Data [35.01650633374998]
  We introduce a novel interpreting framework that learns an interpretable model based on sampling technique to explain prediction models. To narrow down the search space for explanations, we design a learnable anchor algorithm. A set of regulations is further introduced, regarding combining learned interpretable representations with anchors to generate comprehensible explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T02:51:57Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.