Interpreting Robust Optimization via Adversarial Influence Functions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01247v1
• Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 01:19:10 GMT
• Title: Interpreting Robust Optimization via Adversarial Influence Functions
• Authors: Zhun Deng, Cynthia Dwork, Jialiang Wang, Linjun Zhang
• Abstract summary: We introduce the Adversarial Influence Function (AIF) as a tool to investigate the solution produced by robust optimization. To illustrate the usage of AIF, we apply it to study model sensitivity -- a quantity defined to capture the change of prediction losses on the natural data. We use AIF to analyze how model complexity and randomized smoothing affect the model sensitivity with respect to specific models.
• Score: 24.937845875059928
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Robust optimization has been widely used in nowadays data science, especially in adversarial training. However, little research has been done to quantify how robust optimization changes the optimizers and the prediction losses comparing to standard training. In this paper, inspired by the influence function in robust statistics, we introduce the Adversarial Influence Function (AIF) as a tool to investigate the solution produced by robust optimization. The proposed AIF enjoys a closed-form and can be calculated efficiently. To illustrate the usage of AIF, we apply it to study model sensitivity -- a quantity defined to capture the change of prediction losses on the natural data after implementing robust optimization. We use AIF to analyze how model complexity and randomized smoothing affect the model sensitivity with respect to specific models. We further derive AIF for kernel regressions, with a particular application to neural tangent kernels, and experimentally demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed AIF. Lastly, the theories of AIF will be extended to distributional robust optimization.

Related papers

• Adaptive Preference Scaling for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback [103.36048042664768]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a prevalent approach to align AI systems with human values. We propose a novel adaptive preference loss, underpinned by distributionally robust optimization (DRO) Our method is versatile and can be readily adapted to various preference optimization frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-04T20:33:22Z)
• Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
  We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences. To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model. Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z)
• End-to-End Learning for Fair Multiobjective Optimization Under Uncertainty [55.04219793298687]
  The Predict-Then-Forecast (PtO) paradigm in machine learning aims to maximize downstream decision quality. This paper extends the PtO methodology to optimization problems with nondifferentiable Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) objectives. It shows how optimization of OWA functions can be effectively integrated with parametric prediction for fair and robust optimization under uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T16:33:35Z)
• Functional Graphical Models: Structure Enables Offline Data-Driven Optimization [111.28605744661638]
  We show how structure can enable sample-efficient data-driven optimization. We also present a data-driven optimization algorithm that infers the FGM structure itself.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-08T22:33:14Z)
• Efficient Robust Bayesian Optimization for Arbitrary Uncertain Inputs [13.578262325229161]
  We introduce a novel robust Bayesian Optimization algorithm, AIRBO, which can effectively identify a robust optimum that performs consistently well under arbitrary input uncertainty. Our method directly models the uncertain inputs of arbitrary distributions by empowering the Gaussian Process with the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) and further accelerates the posterior inference via Nystrom approximation. Rigorous theoretical regret bound is established under MMD estimation error and extensive experiments on synthetic functions and real problems demonstrate that our approach can handle various input uncertainties and achieve state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T03:29:31Z)
• Optimizer's Information Criterion: Dissecting and Correcting Bias in Data-Driven Optimization [16.57676001669012]
  In data-driven optimization, the sample performance of the obtained decision typically incurs an optimistic bias against the true performance. Common techniques to correct this bias, such as cross-validation, require repeatedly solving additional optimization problems and are therefore expensive. We develop a general bias correction approach that directly approximates the first-order bias and does not require solving any additional optimization problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-16T07:07:58Z)
• FAStEN: An Efficient Adaptive Method for Feature Selection and Estimation in High-Dimensional Functional Regressions [7.674715791336311]
  We propose a new, flexible and ultra-efficient approach to perform feature selection in a sparse function-on-function regression problem. We show how to extend it to the scalar-on-function framework. We present an application to brain fMRI data from the AOMIC PIOP1 study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-26T19:41:17Z)
• Backpropagation of Unrolled Solvers with Folded Optimization [55.04219793298687]
  The integration of constrained optimization models as components in deep networks has led to promising advances on many specialized learning tasks. One typical strategy is algorithm unrolling, which relies on automatic differentiation through the operations of an iterative solver. This paper provides theoretical insights into the backward pass of unrolled optimization, leading to a system for generating efficiently solvable analytical models of backpropagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-28T01:50:42Z)
• An Adaptive Alternating-direction-method-based Nonnegative Latent Factor Model [2.857044909410376]
  An alternating-direction-method-based nonnegative latent factor model can perform efficient representation learning to a high-dimensional and incomplete (HDI) matrix. This paper proposes an Adaptive Alternating-direction-method-based Nonnegative Latent Factor model, whose hyper- parameter adaptation is implemented following the principle of particle swarm optimization. Empirical studies on nonnegative HDI matrices generated by industrial applications indicate that A2NLF outperforms several state-of-the-art models in terms of computational and storage efficiency, as well as maintains highly competitive estimation accuracy for an HDI matrix's missing data
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-11T03:04:26Z)
• Extension of Dynamic Mode Decomposition for dynamic systems with incomplete information based on t-model of optimal prediction [69.81996031777717]
  The Dynamic Mode Decomposition has proved to be a very efficient technique to study dynamic data. The application of this approach becomes problematic if the available data is incomplete because some dimensions of smaller scale either missing or unmeasured. We consider a first-order approximation of the Mori-Zwanzig decomposition, state the corresponding optimization problem and solve it with the gradient-based optimization method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-23T11:23:59Z)
• Curvature Injected Adaptive Momentum Optimizer for Convolutional Neural Networks [21.205976369691765]
  We propose a new approach, hereafter referred as AdaInject, for the descent gradients. The curvature information is used as a weight to inject the second order moment in the update rule. The AdaInject approach boosts the parameter update by exploiting the curvature information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-26T06:24:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.