Quantifying Statistical Significance of Neural Network-based Image Segmentation by Selective Inference

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01823v2
• Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 06:40:53 GMT
• Title: Quantifying Statistical Significance of Neural Network-based Image Segmentation by Selective Inference
• Authors: Vo Nguyen Le Duy, Shogo Iwazaki, Ichiro Takeuchi
• Abstract summary: We use a conditional selective inference (SI) framework to compute exact (non-asymptotic) valid p-values for the segmentation results. Our proposed method can successfully control the false positive rate, has good performance in terms of computational efficiency, and provides good results when applied to medical image data.
• Score: 23.97765106673937
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Although a vast body of literature relates to image segmentation methods that use deep neural networks (DNNs), less attention has been paid to assessing the statistical reliability of segmentation results. In this study, we interpret the segmentation results as hypotheses driven by DNN (called DNN-driven hypotheses) and propose a method by which to quantify the reliability of these hypotheses within a statistical hypothesis testing framework. Specifically, we consider a statistical hypothesis test for the difference between the object and background regions. This problem is challenging, as the difference would be falsely large because of the adaptation of the DNN to the data. To overcome this difficulty, we introduce a conditional selective inference (SI) framework -- a new statistical inference framework for data-driven hypotheses that has recently received considerable attention -- to compute exact (non-asymptotic) valid p-values for the segmentation results. To use the conditional SI framework for DNN-based segmentation, we develop a new SI algorithm based on the homotopy method, which enables us to derive the exact (non-asymptotic) sampling distribution of DNN-driven hypothesis. We conduct experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets, through which we offer evidence that our proposed method can successfully control the false positive rate, has good performance in terms of computational efficiency, and provides good results when applied to medical image data.

Related papers

• Statistical Inference in Tensor Completion: Optimal Uncertainty Quantification and Statistical-to-Computational Gaps [7.174572371800217]
  This paper presents a simple yet efficient method for statistical inference of tensor linear forms using incomplete and noisy observations. It is suitable for various statistical inference tasks, including constructing confidence intervals, inference under heteroskedastic and sub-exponential noise, and simultaneous testing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T03:09:52Z)
• Embedding Trajectory for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Mathematical Reasoning [50.84938730450622]
  We propose a trajectory-based method TV score, which uses trajectory volatility for OOD detection in mathematical reasoning. Our method outperforms all traditional algorithms on GLMs under mathematical reasoning scenarios. Our method can be extended to more applications with high-density features in output spaces, such as multiple-choice questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T22:22:25Z)
• Hypothesis-Driven Deep Learning for Out of Distribution Detection [0.8191518216608217]
  We propose a hypothesis-driven approach to quantify whether a new sample is InD or OoD. We adapt our method to detect an unseen sample of bacteria to a trained deep learning model, and show that it reveals interpretable differences between InD and OoD latent responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T01:06:47Z)
• Bounded P-values in Parametric Programming-based Selective Inference [23.35466397627952]
  We introduce a procedure to reduce the computational cost while guaranteeing the desired precision, by proposing a method to compute the lower and upper bounds of p-values. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in hypothesis testing problems for feature selection in linear models and attention region identification in deep neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-21T04:55:03Z)
• Energy-based Out-of-Distribution Detection for Graph Neural Networks [76.0242218180483]
  We propose a simple, powerful and efficient OOD detection model for GNN-based learning on graphs, which we call GNNSafe. GNNSafe achieves up to $17.0%$ AUROC improvement over state-of-the-arts and it could serve as simple yet strong baselines in such an under-developed area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T16:38:43Z)
• A Sieve Quasi-likelihood Ratio Test for Neural Networks with Applications to Genetic Association Studies [0.32771631221674324]
  We propose a quasi sieve-likelihood ratio test based on NN with one hidden layer for testing complex associations. The validity of the distribution is investigated via simulations. We demonstrate the use of the proposed test by performing a genetic association analysis of the sequencing data from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-16T02:54:46Z)
• Validation Diagnostics for SBI algorithms based on Normalizing Flows [55.41644538483948]
  This work proposes easy to interpret validation diagnostics for multi-dimensional conditional (posterior) density estimators based on NF. It also offers theoretical guarantees based on results of local consistency. This work should help the design of better specified models or drive the development of novel SBI-algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-17T15:48:06Z)
• Statistical Testing for Efficient Out of Distribution Detection in Deep Neural Networks [26.0303701309125]
  This paper frames the Out Of Distribution (OOD) detection problem in Deep Neural Networks as a statistical hypothesis testing problem. We build on this framework to suggest a novel OOD procedure based on low-order statistics. Our method achieves comparable or better than state-of-the-art results on well-accepted OOD benchmarks without retraining the network parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-25T16:14:47Z)
• An Uncertainty-Driven GCN Refinement Strategy for Organ Segmentation [53.425900196763756]
  We propose a segmentation refinement method based on uncertainty analysis and graph convolutional networks. We employ the uncertainty levels of the convolutional network in a particular input volume to formulate a semi-supervised graph learning problem. We show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art CRF refinement method by improving the dice score by 1% for the pancreas and 2% for spleen.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-06T18:55:07Z)
• Statistical model-based evaluation of neural networks [74.10854783437351]
  We develop an experimental setup for the evaluation of neural networks (NNs) The setup helps to benchmark a set of NNs vis-a-vis minimum-mean-square-error (MMSE) performance bounds. This allows us to test the effects of training data size, data dimension, data geometry, noise, and mismatch between training and testing conditions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-18T00:33:24Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.