Hacia los Comit\'es de \'Etica en Inteligencia Artificial
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.05673v1
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 23:48:31 GMT
- Title: Hacia los Comit\'es de \'Etica en Inteligencia Artificial
- Authors: Sof\'ia Trejo and Ivan Meza and Fernanda L\'opez-Escobedo
- Abstract summary: It is priority to create the rules and specialized organizations that can oversight the following of such rules.
This work proposes the creation, at the universities, of Ethical Committees or Commissions specialized on Artificial Intelligence.
- Score: 68.8204255655161
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The goal of Artificial Intelligence based systems is to take decisions that
have an effect in their environment and impact society. This points out to the
necessity of mechanism that regulate the impact of this type of system in
society. For this reason, it is priority to create the rules and specialized
organizations that can oversight the following of such rules, particularly that
human rights precepts at local and international level. This work proposes the
creation, at the universities, of Ethical Committees or Commissions specialized
on Artificial Intelligence that would be in charge of define the principles and
will guarantee the following of good practices in the field Artificial
Intelligence.
Related papers
- Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act)
Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence.
As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z) - The Artificial Intelligence Act: critical overview [0.0]
This article provides a critical overview of the recently approved Artificial Intelligence Act.
It starts by presenting the main structure, objectives, and approach of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689.
The text concludes that even if the overall framework can be deemed adequate and balanced, the approach is so complex that it risks defeating its own purpose.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-30T21:38:02Z) - Human Oversight of Artificial Intelligence and Technical Standardisation [0.0]
Within the global governance of AI, the requirement for human oversight is embodied in several regulatory formats.
The EU legislator is therefore going much further than in the past in "spelling out" the legal requirement for human oversight.
The question of the place of humans in the AI decision-making process should be given particular attention.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T07:43:46Z) - Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair
Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
"Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture.
This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias.
In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z) - A Review of the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and its Applications
in the United States [0.0]
The paper highlights the impact AI has in every sector of the US economy and the resultant effect on entities spanning businesses, government, academia, and civil society.
Our discussion explores eleven fundamental 'ethical principles' structured as overarching themes.
These encompass Transparency, Justice, Fairness, Equity, Non- Maleficence, Responsibility, Accountability, Privacy, Beneficence, Freedom, Autonomy, Trust, Dignity, Sustainability, and Solidarity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-09T14:29:00Z) - On the Efficiency of Ethics as a Governing Tool for Artificial
Intelligence [0.0]
Artificial Intelligence Ethics and Safety is an emerging research field that has been gaining popularity in recent years.
Several private, public and non-governmental organizations have published guidelines proposing ethical principles for regulating the use and development of autonomous intelligent systems.
We would like to conduct a critical analysis of the current state of AI Ethics and suggest that this form of governance is not sufficient to norm the AI industry and its developers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-27T09:46:33Z) - Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary
Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them.
We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives.
We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z) - Toward a Theory of Justice for Artificial Intelligence [2.28438857884398]
It holds that the basic structure of society should be understood as a composite of socio-technical systems.
As a consequence, egalitarian norms of justice apply to the technology when it is deployed in these contexts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-27T13:23:38Z) - An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI)
for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive
qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence.
The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z) - On the Morality of Artificial Intelligence [154.69452301122175]
We propose conceptual and practical principles and guidelines for Machine Learning research and deployment.
We insist on concrete actions that can be taken by practitioners to pursue a more ethical and moral practice of ML aimed at using AI for social good.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2019-12-26T23:06:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.