A Mathematical Exploration of Why Language Models Help Solve Downstream Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03648v2
• Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:59:14 GMT
• Title: A Mathematical Exploration of Why Language Models Help Solve Downstream Tasks
• Authors: Nikunj Saunshi, Sadhika Malladi, Sanjeev Arora
• Abstract summary: Autoregressive language models, pretrained using large text corpora to do well on next word prediction, have been successful at solving many downstream tasks. This paper initiates a mathematical study of this phenomenon for the downstream task of text classification.
• Score: 35.046596668631615
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Autoregressive language models, pretrained using large text corpora to do well on next word prediction, have been successful at solving many downstream tasks, even with zero-shot usage. However, there is little theoretical understanding of this success. This paper initiates a mathematical study of this phenomenon for the downstream task of text classification by considering the following questions: (1) What is the intuitive connection between the pretraining task of next word prediction and text classification? (2) How can we mathematically formalize this connection and quantify the benefit of language modeling? For (1), we hypothesize, and verify empirically, that classification tasks of interest can be reformulated as sentence completion tasks, thus making language modeling a meaningful pretraining task. With a mathematical formalization of this hypothesis, we make progress towards (2) and show that language models that are $\epsilon$-optimal in cross-entropy (log-perplexity) learn features that can linearly solve such classification tasks with $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\epsilon})$ error, thus demonstrating that doing well on language modeling can be beneficial for downstream tasks. We experimentally verify various assumptions and theoretical findings, and also use insights from the analysis to design a new objective function that performs well on some classification tasks.

Related papers

• Likelihood as a Performance Gauge for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [78.28197013467157]
  We show that likelihoods serve as an effective gauge for language model performance. We propose two methods that use question likelihood as a gauge for selecting and constructing prompts that lead to better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:14:09Z)
• Semformer: Transformer Language Models with Semantic Planning [18.750863564495006]
  Next-token prediction serves as the dominant component in current neural language models. We introduce Semformer, a novel method of training a Transformer language model that explicitly models the semantic planning of response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T12:54:34Z)
• Generative Models as a Complex Systems Science: How can we make sense of large language model behavior? [75.79305790453654]
  Coaxing out desired behavior from pretrained models, while avoiding undesirable ones, has redefined NLP. We argue for a systematic effort to decompose language model behavior into categories that explain cross-task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T22:58:41Z)
• A Sentence is Worth a Thousand Pictures: Can Large Language Models Understand Hum4n L4ngu4ge and the W0rld behind W0rds? [2.7342737448775534]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been linked to claims about human-like linguistic performance. We analyze the contribution of LLMs as theoretically informative representations of a target cognitive system. We evaluate the models' ability to see the bigger picture, through top-down feedback from higher levels of processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-26T18:58:53Z)
• Opening the Black Box: Analyzing Attention Weights and Hidden States in Pre-trained Language Models for Non-language Tasks [0.8889304968879164]
  We apply a pre-trained language model to constrained arithmetic problems with hierarchical structure, to analyze their attention weight scores and hidden states. The investigation reveals promising results, with the model addressing hierarchical problems in a moderately structured manner, similar to human problem-solving strategies. The attention analysis allows us to hypothesize that the model can generalize to longer sequences in ListOps dataset, a conclusion later confirmed through testing on sequences longer than those in the training set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-21T11:48:07Z)
• Language Model Pre-Training with Sparse Latent Typing [66.75786739499604]
  We propose a new pre-training objective, Sparse Latent Typing, which enables the model to sparsely extract sentence-level keywords with diverse latent types. Experimental results show that our model is able to learn interpretable latent type categories in a self-supervised manner without using any external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T00:37:08Z)
• UU-Tax at SemEval-2022 Task 3: Improving the generalizability of language models for taxonomy classification through data augmentation [0.0]
  This paper addresses the SemEval-2022 Task 3 PreTENS: Presupposed Taxonomies evaluating Neural Network Semantics. The goal of the task is to identify if a sentence is deemed acceptable or not, depending on the taxonomic relationship that holds between a noun pair contained in the sentence. We propose an effective way to enhance the robustness and the generalizability of language models for better classification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T07:41:28Z)
• Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processing [78.8500633981247]
  This paper surveys and organizes research works in a new paradigm in natural language processing, which we dub "prompt-based learning" Unlike traditional supervised learning, which trains a model to take in an input x and predict an output y as P(y|x), prompt-based learning is based on language models that model the probability of text directly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T18:09:46Z)
• Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Little [74.49773960145681]
  A possible explanation for the impressive performance of masked language model (MLM)-training is that such models have learned to represent the syntactic structures prevalent in NLP pipelines. In this paper, we propose a different explanation: pre-trains succeed on downstream tasks almost entirely due to their ability to model higher-order word co-occurrence statistics. Our results show that purely distributional information largely explains the success of pre-training, and underscore the importance of curating challenging evaluation datasets that require deeper linguistic knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-14T06:30:36Z)
• Learning Better Sentence Representation with Syntax Information [0.0]
  We propose a novel approach to combining syntax information with a pre-trained language model. Our model achieves 91.2% accuracy, outperforming the baseline model by 37.8% on sentence completion task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-09T12:15:08Z)
• Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structure [74.04862204427944]
  We propose an information-theoretic operationalization of probing as estimating mutual information. We evaluate on a set of ten typologically diverse languages often underrepresented in NLP research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T01:06:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.