A standardized framework for risk-based assessment of treatment effect heterogeneity in observational healthcare databases

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.06430v2
• Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 12:29:07 GMT
• Title: A standardized framework for risk-based assessment of treatment effect heterogeneity in observational healthcare databases
• Authors: Alexandros Rekkas, David van Klaveren, Patrick B. Ryan, Ewout W. Steyerberg, David M. Kent, Peter R. Rijnbeek
• Abstract summary: The aim of this study was to extend this approach to the observational setting using a standardized scalable framework. We demonstrate our framework by evaluating the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus beta blockers on three efficacy and six safety outcomes.
• Score: 60.07352590494571
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Predictive Approaches to Treatment Effect Heterogeneity statement focused on baseline risk as a robust predictor of treatment effect and provided guidance on risk-based assessment of treatment effect heterogeneity in the RCT setting. The aim of this study was to extend this approach to the observational setting using a standardized scalable framework. The proposed framework consists of five steps: 1) definition of the research aim, i.e., the population, the treatment, the comparator and the outcome(s) of interest; 2) identification of relevant databases; 3) development of a prediction model for the outcome(s) of interest; 4) estimation of relative and absolute treatment effect within strata of predicted risk, after adjusting for observed confounding; 5) presentation of the results. We demonstrate our framework by evaluating heterogeneity of the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors versus beta blockers on three efficacy and six safety outcomes across three observational databases. The proposed framework can supplement any comparative effectiveness study. We provide a publicly available R software package for applying this framework to any database mapped to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model. In our demonstration, patients at low risk of acute myocardial infarction received negligible absolute benefits for all three efficacy outcomes, though they were more pronounced in the highest risk quarter, especially for hospitalization with heart failure. However, failing diagnostics showed evidence of residual imbalances even after adjustment for observed confounding. Our framework allows for the evaluation of differential treatment effects across risk strata, which offers the opportunity to consider the benefit-harm trade-off between alternative treatments.

Related papers

• Causal Inference under Data Restrictions [0.0]
  This dissertation focuses on modern causal inference under uncertainty and data restrictions. It includes applications to neoadjuvant clinical trials, distributed data networks, and robust individualized decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-20T20:14:32Z)
• Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference [58.442274475425144]
  Since the average treatment effect measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population. In this paper we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution. Some bounds can also be interpreted as summarizing a complex CATE function into a single metric and are of interest independently of being a bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T17:21:26Z)
• SurvITE: Learning Heterogeneous Treatment Effects from Time-to-Event Data [83.50281440043241]
  We study the problem of inferring heterogeneous treatment effects from time-to-event data. We propose a novel deep learning method for treatment-specific hazard estimation based on balancing representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-26T20:13:17Z)
• Estimating heterogeneous survival treatment effect in observational data using machine learning [9.951103976634407]
  Methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effect in observational data have largely focused on continuous or binary outcomes. Using flexible machine learning methods in the counterfactual framework is a promising approach to address challenges due to complex individual characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T01:02:14Z)
• Individual Treatment Prescription Effect Estimation in a Low Compliance Setting [11.672067762133299]
  Individual Treatment Effect estimation is an extensively researched problem, with applications in various domains. We propose a new approach for the estimation of the IPE that takes advantage of observed compliance information to prevent signal fading. We conduct experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets that highlight the benefit of the approach, which consistently improves state-of-the-art in low compliance settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-07T15:53:00Z)
• Enabling Counterfactual Survival Analysis with Balanced Representations [64.17342727357618]
  Survival data are frequently encountered across diverse medical applications, i.e., drug development, risk profiling, and clinical trials. We propose a theoretically grounded unified framework for counterfactual inference applicable to survival outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-14T01:15:00Z)
• Learning Decomposed Representation for Counterfactual Inference [53.36586760485262]
  The fundamental problem in treatment effect estimation from observational data is confounder identification and balancing. Most of the previous methods realized confounder balancing by treating all observed pre-treatment variables as confounders, ignoring further identifying confounders and non-confounders. We propose a synergistic learning framework to 1) identify confounders by learning representations of both confounders and non-confounders, 2) balance confounder with sample re-weighting technique, and simultaneously 3) estimate the treatment effect in observational studies via counterfactual inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T09:50:42Z)
• Survival Analysis Using a 5-Step Stratified Testing and Amalgamation Routine in Randomized Clinical Trials [0.0]
  Increased patient heterogeneity can weaken the ability of common statistical approaches to detect treatment differences. A list of baseline covariates that have the potential to be prognostic for survival under either treatment is pre-specified. A conditional inference tree algorithm is used to segment the heterogeneous trial population into subpopulations of prognostically homogeneous patients. The impressive power-boosting performance of our proposed 5-step stratified testing and amalgamation routine (5-STAR) is illustrated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T15:44:41Z)
• Generalization Bounds and Representation Learning for Estimation of Potential Outcomes and Causal Effects [61.03579766573421]
  We study estimation of individual-level causal effects, such as a single patient's response to alternative medication. We devise representation learning algorithms that minimize our bound, by regularizing the representation's induced treatment group distance. We extend these algorithms to simultaneously learn a weighted representation to further reduce treatment group distances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-21T10:16:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.