Theoretical bounds on estimation error for meta-learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.07140v1
• Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 14:57:21 GMT
• Title: Theoretical bounds on estimation error for meta-learning
• Authors: James Lucas, Mengye Ren, Irene Kameni, Toniann Pitassi, Richard Zemel
• Abstract summary: We provide novel information-theoretic lower-bounds on minimax rates of convergence for algorithms trained on data from multiple sources and tested on novel data. Our bounds depend intuitively on the information shared between sources of data, and characterize the difficulty of learning in this setting for arbitrary algorithms.
• Score: 29.288915378272375
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning models have traditionally been developed under the assumption that the training and test distributions match exactly. However, recent success in few-shot learning and related problems are encouraging signs that these models can be adapted to more realistic settings where train and test distributions differ. Unfortunately, there is severely limited theoretical support for these algorithms and little is known about the difficulty of these problems. In this work, we provide novel information-theoretic lower-bounds on minimax rates of convergence for algorithms that are trained on data from multiple sources and tested on novel data. Our bounds depend intuitively on the information shared between sources of data, and characterize the difficulty of learning in this setting for arbitrary algorithms. We demonstrate these bounds on a hierarchical Bayesian model of meta-learning, computing both upper and lower bounds on parameter estimation via maximum-a-posteriori inference.

Related papers

• Calibration-then-Calculation: A Variance Reduced Metric Framework in Deep Click-Through Rate Prediction Models [16.308958212406583]
  There is a lack of focus on evaluating the performance of deep learning pipelines. With the increased use of large datasets and complex models, the training process is run only once and the result is compared to previous benchmarks. Traditional solutions, such as running the training process multiple times, are often infeasible due to computational constraints. We introduce a novel metric framework, the Calibrated Loss Metric, designed to address this issue by reducing the variance present in its conventional counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T02:38:23Z)
• Uncertainty quantification for learned ISTA [5.706217259840463]
  Algorithm unrolling schemes stand out among these model-based learning techniques. They lack certainty estimates and a theory for uncertainty quantification is still elusive. This work proposes a rigorous way to obtain confidence intervals for the LISTA estimator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T18:39:07Z)
• Towards a Better Theoretical Understanding of Independent Subnetwork Training [56.24689348875711]
  We take a closer theoretical look at Independent Subnetwork Training (IST) IST is a recently proposed and highly effective technique for solving the aforementioned problems. We identify fundamental differences between IST and alternative approaches, such as distributed methods with compressed communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-28T18:14:22Z)
• Improved Robust Algorithms for Learning with Discriminative Feature Feedback [21.58493386054356]
  Discriminative Feature Feedback is a protocol for interactive learning based on feature explanations that are provided by a human teacher. We provide new robust interactive learning algorithms for the Discriminative Feature Feedback model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-08T12:11:12Z)
• Distributionally Robust Models with Parametric Likelihood Ratios [123.05074253513935]
  Three simple ideas allow us to train models with DRO using a broader class of parametric likelihood ratios. We find that models trained with the resulting parametric adversaries are consistently more robust to subpopulation shifts when compared to other DRO approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-13T12:43:12Z)
• Minimax rate of consistency for linear models with missing values [0.0]
  Missing values arise in most real-world data sets due to the aggregation of multiple sources and intrinsically missing information (sensor failure, unanswered questions in surveys...). In this paper, we focus on the extensively-studied linear models, but in presence of missing values, which turns out to be quite a challenging task. This eventually requires to solve a number of learning tasks, exponential in the number of input features, which makes predictions impossible for current real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T08:45:34Z)
• Last Layer Marginal Likelihood for Invariance Learning [12.00078928875924]
  We introduce a new lower bound to the marginal likelihood, which allows us to perform inference for a larger class of likelihood functions. We work towards bringing this approach to neural networks by using an architecture with a Gaussian process in the last layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-14T15:40:51Z)
• Learning while Respecting Privacy and Robustness to Distributional Uncertainties and Adversarial Data [66.78671826743884]
  The distributionally robust optimization framework is considered for training a parametric model. The objective is to endow the trained model with robustness against adversarially manipulated input data. Proposed algorithms offer robustness with little overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T18:25:25Z)
• Good Classifiers are Abundant in the Interpolating Regime [64.72044662855612]
  We develop a methodology to compute precisely the full distribution of test errors among interpolating classifiers. We find that test errors tend to concentrate around a small typical value $varepsilon*$, which deviates substantially from the test error of worst-case interpolating model. Our results show that the usual style of analysis in statistical learning theory may not be fine-grained enough to capture the good generalization performance observed in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T21:12:31Z)
• Learning Diverse Representations for Fast Adaptation to Distribution Shift [78.83747601814669]
  We present a method for learning multiple models, incorporating an objective that pressures each to learn a distinct way to solve the task. We demonstrate our framework's ability to facilitate rapid adaptation to distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T12:23:50Z)
• Meta-Learned Confidence for Few-shot Learning [60.6086305523402]
  A popular transductive inference technique for few-shot metric-based approaches, is to update the prototype of each class with the mean of the most confident query examples. We propose to meta-learn the confidence for each query sample, to assign optimal weights to unlabeled queries. We validate our few-shot learning model with meta-learned confidence on four benchmark datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-27T10:22:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.