A Bayesian Approach for Characterizing and Mitigating Gate and
Measurement Errors
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.09188v6
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2022 17:54:12 GMT
- Title: A Bayesian Approach for Characterizing and Mitigating Gate and
Measurement Errors
- Authors: Muqing Zheng, Ang Li, Tam\'as Terlaky, Xiu Yang
- Abstract summary: We use a Bayesian inference approach to identify parameters such as gate and readout error rates.
By characterizing the device errors in this way, we can further improve the accuracy of quantum error mitigation.
- Score: 9.59731214999568
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Various noise models have been developed in quantum computing study to
describe the propagation and effect of the noise which is caused by imperfect
implementation of hardware. Identifying parameters such as gate and readout
error rates are critical to these models. We use a Bayesian inference approach
to identity posterior distributions of these parameters, such that they can be
characterized more elaborately. By characterizing the device errors in this
way, we can further improve the accuracy of quantum error mitigation.
Experiments conducted on IBM's quantum computing devices suggest that our
approach provides better error mitigation performance than existing techniques
used by the vendor. Also, our approach outperforms the standard Bayesian
inference method in such experiments.
Related papers
- Robust design under uncertainty in quantum error mitigation [0.8258451067861933]
Classical post-processing of quantum outcomes is a popular approach for error mitigation.
We propose general and unbiased methods for quantifying the uncertainty and error of error-mitigated observables by sampling error mitigation outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-11T14:48:03Z) - Volumetric Benchmarking of Quantum Computing Noise Models [3.0098885383612104]
We present a systematic approach to benchmark noise models for quantum computing applications.
It compares the results of hardware experiments to predictions of noise models for a representative set of quantum circuits.
We also construct a noise model and optimize its parameters with a series of training circuits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-14T10:49:01Z) - Sharp Calibrated Gaussian Processes [58.94710279601622]
State-of-the-art approaches for designing calibrated models rely on inflating the Gaussian process posterior variance.
We present a calibration approach that generates predictive quantiles using a computation inspired by the vanilla Gaussian process posterior variance.
Our approach is shown to yield a calibrated model under reasonable assumptions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T12:17:36Z) - Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and
Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application.
We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor.
This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z) - Analytical and experimental study of center line miscalibrations in M\o
lmer-S\o rensen gates [51.93099889384597]
We study a systematic perturbative expansion in miscalibrated parameters of the Molmer-Sorensen entangling gate.
We compute the gate evolution operator which allows us to obtain relevant key properties.
We verify the predictions from our model by benchmarking them against measurements in a trapped-ion quantum processor.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-10T10:56:16Z) - Investigating the variance increase of readout error mitigation through
classical bit-flip correction on IBM and Rigetti quantum computers [2.619913272279451]
Readout errors are among the most dominant errors on current noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices.
In this talk, we compare the performance of this method for IBM's and Rigetti's quantum devices.
We derive a new expression for the variance of the mitigated Pauli operators in terms of the corrected expectation values and the noisy variances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-09T10:07:56Z) - Performance of teleportation-based error correction circuits for bosonic
codes with noisy measurements [58.720142291102135]
We analyze the error-correction capabilities of rotation-symmetric codes using a teleportation-based error-correction circuit.
We find that with the currently achievable measurement efficiencies in microwave optics, bosonic rotation codes undergo a substantial decrease in their break-even potential.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-02T16:12:13Z) - Quasiprobability decompositions with reduced sampling overhead [4.38301148531795]
Quantum error mitigation techniques can reduce noise on current quantum hardware without the need for fault-tolerant quantum error correction.
We present a new algorithm based on mathematical optimization that aims to choose the quasiprobability decomposition in a noise-aware manner.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-22T19:00:06Z) - Efficient and robust certification of genuine multipartite entanglement
in noisy quantum error correction circuits [58.720142291102135]
We introduce a conditional witnessing technique to certify genuine multipartite entanglement (GME)
We prove that the detection of entanglement in a linear number of bipartitions by a number of measurements scales linearly, suffices to certify GME.
We apply our method to the noisy readout of stabilizer operators of the distance-three topological color code and its flag-based fault-tolerant version.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-06T18:00:07Z) - Scalable quantum processor noise characterization [57.57666052437813]
We present a scalable way to construct approximate MFMs for many-qubit devices based on cumulant expansion.
Our method can also be used to characterize various types of correlation error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-02T17:39:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.