Robust design under uncertainty in quantum error mitigation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05302v1
• Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:48:03 GMT
• Title: Robust design under uncertainty in quantum error mitigation
• Authors: Piotr Czarnik, Michael McKerns, Andrew T. Sornborger, Lukasz Cincio
• Abstract summary: Classical post-processing of quantum outcomes is a popular approach for error mitigation. We propose general and unbiased methods for quantifying the uncertainty and error of error-mitigated observables by sampling error mitigation outcomes.
• Score: 0.8258451067861933
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Error mitigation techniques are crucial to achieving near-term quantum advantage. Classical post-processing of quantum computation outcomes is a popular approach for error mitigation, which includes methods such as Zero Noise Extrapolation, Virtual Distillation, and learning-based error mitigation. However, these techniques have limitations due to the propagation of uncertainty resulting from a finite shot number of the quantum measurement. To overcome this limitation, we propose general and unbiased methods for quantifying the uncertainty and error of error-mitigated observables by sampling error mitigation outcomes. These methods are applicable to any post-processing-based error mitigation approach. In addition, we present a systematic approach for optimizing the performance and robustness of these error mitigation methods under uncertainty, building on our proposed uncertainty quantification methods. To illustrate the effectiveness of our methods, we apply them to Clifford Data Regression in the ground state of the XY model simulated using IBM's Toronto noise model.

Related papers

• Bounding the systematic error in quantum error mitigation due to model violation [0.0]
  We develop a methodology to efficiently compute upper bounds on the impact of error-model inaccuracy in error mitigation. Our protocols require no additional experiments, and instead rely on comparisons between the error model and the error-learning data. We show that our estimated upper bounds are typically close to the worst observed performance of error mitigation on random circuits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-20T16:27:00Z)
• One step closer to unbiased aleatoric uncertainty estimation [71.55174353766289]
  We propose a new estimation method by actively de-noising the observed data. By conducting a broad range of experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed approach provides a much closer approximation to the actual data uncertainty than the standard method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-16T14:59:11Z)
• Sharp Calibrated Gaussian Processes [58.94710279601622]
  State-of-the-art approaches for designing calibrated models rely on inflating the Gaussian process posterior variance. We present a calibration approach that generates predictive quantiles using a computation inspired by the vanilla Gaussian process posterior variance. Our approach is shown to yield a calibrated model under reasonable assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T12:17:36Z)
• Exponentially tighter bounds on limitations of quantum error mitigation [2.936007114555107]
  Quantum error mitigation has been proposed as a means to combat unwanted and unavoidable errors in near-term quantum computing. In this work, we identify strong limitations to the degree to which quantum noise can be effectively undone' for larger system sizes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-20T18:12:42Z)
• Measuring NISQ Gate-Based Qubit Stability Using a 1+1 Field Theory and Cycle Benchmarking [50.8020641352841]
  We study coherent errors on a quantum hardware platform using a transverse field Ising model Hamiltonian as a sample user application. We identify inter-day and intra-day qubit calibration drift and the impacts of quantum circuit placement on groups of qubits in different physical locations on the processor. This paper also discusses how these measurements can provide a better understanding of these types of errors and how they may improve efforts to validate the accuracy of quantum computations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-08T23:12:55Z)
• Enhancing quantum models of stochastic processes with error mitigation [0.0]
  We bridge the gap between theoretical quantum models and practical use with the inclusion of error mitigation methods. It is observed that error mitigation is successful in improving the resultant expectation values. While our results indicate that error mitigation work, we show that its methodology is ultimately constrained by hardware limitations in these quantum computers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-13T17:45:34Z)
• Crosstalk Suppression for Fault-tolerant Quantum Error Correction with Trapped Ions [62.997667081978825]
  We present a study of crosstalk errors in a quantum-computing architecture based on a single string of ions confined by a radio-frequency trap, and manipulated by individually-addressed laser beams. This type of errors affects spectator qubits that, ideally, should remain unaltered during the application of single- and two-qubit quantum gates addressed at a different set of active qubits. We microscopically model crosstalk errors from first principles and present a detailed study showing the importance of using a coherent vs incoherent error modelling and, moreover, discuss strategies to actively suppress this crosstalk at the gate level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-21T14:20:40Z)
• Assessment of weak-coupling approximations on a driven two-level system under dissipation [58.720142291102135]
  We study a driven qubit through the numerically exact and non-perturbative method known as the Liouville-von equation with dissipation. We propose a metric that may be used in experiments to map the regime of validity of the Lindblad equation in predicting the steady state of the driven qubit.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-11T22:45:57Z)
• A Bayesian Approach for Characterizing and Mitigating Gate and Measurement Errors [9.59731214999568]
  We use a Bayesian inference approach to identify parameters such as gate and readout error rates. By characterizing the device errors in this way, we can further improve the accuracy of quantum error mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T03:27:28Z)
• Multi-exponential Error Extrapolation and Combining Error Mitigation Techniques for NISQ Applications [0.0]
  Noise in quantum hardware remains the biggest roadblock for the implementation of quantum computers. Error extrapolation is an error mitigation technique that has been successfully implemented experimentally. We extend this to multi-exponential error extrapolation and provide more rigorous proof for its effectiveness under Pauli noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-02T17:18:47Z)
• Learning to Predict Error for MRI Reconstruction [67.76632988696943]
  We demonstrate that predictive uncertainty estimated by the current methods does not highly correlate with prediction error. We propose a novel method that estimates the target labels and magnitude of the prediction error in two steps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-13T15:55:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.